IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.07571.html

Forecasting implied volatility surface with generative diffusion models

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Jin
  • Ankush Agarwal

Abstract

Diffusion Probabilistic Model (DDPM) for generating one-day-ahead arbitrage-free implied volatility surfaces. To capture the path-dependent nature of volatility dynamics, we condition our model on a set of market variables, including exponentially weighted moving averages (EWMAs) of historical vol-surfaces, returns and squared returns of the underlying asset, and scalar risk indicators associated with the underlying asset. A key challenge is that historical data often contains arbitrage opportunities in the earlier dataset for training, which conflicts with the goal of generating arbitrage-free surfaces. We address this by using a parameter-free weighting scheme based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to incorporate the arbitrage penalty into the loss function. The scheme dynamically adjusts the penalty strength across the diffusion process. Through numerical experiments using market data, we demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed model in volatility forecasting compared to existing approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Jin & Ankush Agarwal, 2025. "Forecasting implied volatility surface with generative diffusion models," Papers 2511.07571, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.07571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.07571
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milena Vuletić & Rama Cont, 2024. "VolGAN: A Generative Model for Arbitrage-Free Implied Volatility Surfaces," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 203-238, July.
    2. Rama Cont & Jose da Fonseca, 2002. "Dynamics of implied volatility surfaces," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 45-60.
    3. Minshuo Chen & Renyuan Xu & Yumin Xu & Ruixun Zhang, 2025. "Diffusion Factor Models: Generating High-Dimensional Returns with Factor Structure," Papers 2504.06566, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    4. Jim Gatheral & Antoine Jacquier, 2014. "Arbitrage-free SVI volatility surfaces," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 59-71, January.
    5. Heston, Steven L, 1993. "A Closed-Form Solution for Options with Stochastic Volatility with Applications to Bond and Currency Options," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 6(2), pages 327-343.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing Wang & Shuaiqiang Liu & Cornelis Vuik, 2025. "Controllable Generation of Implied Volatility Surfaces with Variational Autoencoders," Papers 2509.01743, arXiv.org.
    2. Jimin Lin, 2026. "Shallow Representation of Option Implied Information," Papers 2603.17151, arXiv.org.
    3. Samuel N. Cohen & Christoph Reisinger & Sheng Wang, 2021. "Arbitrage-free neural-SDE market models," Papers 2105.11053, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    4. Andrew Na & Meixin Zhang & Justin Wan, 2023. "Computing Volatility Surfaces using Generative Adversarial Networks with Minimal Arbitrage Violations," Papers 2304.13128, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    5. Itkin, Andrey, 2015. "To sigmoid-based functional description of the volatility smile," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 264-291.
    6. Yufeng Shi & Bin Teng & Sicong Wang, 2025. "Option pricing mechanisms driven by backward stochastic differential equations," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Hans Buehler & Blanka Horvath & Anastasis Kratsios & Yannick Limmer & Raeid Saqur, 2026. "SANOS Smooth strictly Arbitrage-free Non-parametric Option Surfaces," Papers 2601.11209, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    8. Boswijk, H. Peter & Laeven, Roger J.A. & Vladimirov, Evgenii, 2024. "Estimating option pricing models using a characteristic function-based linear state space representation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(1).
    9. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Li, Chenxu & Li, Chen Xu, 2021. "Closed-form implied volatility surfaces for stochastic volatility models with jumps," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 364-392.
    10. Jaehyuk Choi, 2024. "Exact simulation scheme for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck driven stochastic volatility model with the Karhunen-Lo\`eve expansions," Papers 2402.09243, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    11. Ciprian Necula & Gabriel Drimus & Walter Farkas, 2019. "A general closed form option pricing formula," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-40, April.
    12. Vedant Choudhary & Sebastian Jaimungal & Maxime Bergeron, 2023. "FuNVol: A Multi-Asset Implied Volatility Market Simulator using Functional Principal Components and Neural SDEs," Papers 2303.00859, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    13. A. Monteiro & R. Tütüncü & L. Vicente, 2011. "Estimation of risk-neutral density surfaces," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 387-414, November.
    14. Henri Bertholon & Alain Monfort & Fulvio Pegoraro, 2006. "Pricing and Inference with Mixtures of Conditionally Normal Processes," Working Papers 2006-28, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    15. Sergey Badikov & Mark H. A. Davis & Antoine Jacquier, 2018. "Perturbation analysis of sub/super hedging problems," Papers 1806.03543, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    16. Bastien Baldacci, 2020. "High-frequency dynamics of the implied volatility surface," Papers 2012.10875, arXiv.org.
    17. Seungho Yang & Jaewook Lee, 2014. "Do affine jump-diffusion models require global calibration? Empirical studies from option markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 111-123, January.
    18. Borak, Szymon & Fengler, Matthias R. & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl, 2005. "DSFM fitting of implied volatility surfaces," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2005-022, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    19. Jianhui Li & Sebastian A. Gehricke & Jin E. Zhang, 2019. "How do US options traders “smirk” on China? Evidence from FXI options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(11), pages 1450-1470, November.
    20. Manfred Gilli & Enrico Schumann, 2012. "Heuristic optimisation in financial modelling," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 129-158, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.07571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.