IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2509.11562.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Human or Robot? Evidence from Last-Mile Delivery Service

Author

Listed:
  • Baorui Li
  • Xincheng Ma
  • Brian Rongqing Han
  • Daizhong Tang
  • Lei Fu

Abstract

As platforms increasingly deploy robots alongside human labor in last-mile logistics, little is known about how contextual features like product attributes, environmental conditions, and psychological mechanisms shape consumer preference in real-world settings. To address this gap, this paper conducts an empirical study on consumer choice between human versus robot service, analyzing 241,517 package-level choices from Alibaba's last-mile delivery stations. We identify how product privacy sensitivity, product value, and environmental complexity affect consumer preference. Our findings reveal that consumers are significantly more likely to choose robot delivery for privacy-sensitive packages (11.49%) and high-value products (0.97% per 1% increase in value), but prefer human couriers under adverse weather conditions (1.63%). These patterns are robust to alternative specifications and controls. These results also underscore that delivery choices are shaped not only by functional considerations but also by psychological concerns, highlighting the need for context-aware service design that aligns strategies with consumer perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Baorui Li & Xincheng Ma & Brian Rongqing Han & Daizhong Tang & Lei Fu, 2025. "Human or Robot? Evidence from Last-Mile Delivery Service," Papers 2509.11562, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.11562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.11562
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bing Bai & Hengchen Dai & Dennis J. Zhang & Fuqiang Zhang & Haoyuan Hu, 2022. "The Impacts of Algorithmic Work Assignment on Fairness Perceptions and Productivity: Evidence from Field Experiments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 3060-3078, November.
    2. Pedro Amorim & Nicole DeHoratius & Fredrik Eng-Larsson & Sara Martins, 2024. "Customer Preferences for Delivery Service Attributes in Attended Home Delivery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7559-7578, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bonomi, Valentina & Manerba, Daniele & Mansini, Renata & Zanotti, Roberto, 2025. "Optimizing Attended Home Delivery: Multiple recovery options and customer availability profiles to face synchronization failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    2. Yang, Yihao & Chi, Ming & Bi, Xinhua & Xu, Yongshun, 2025. "Dark sides of algorithmic control in app-based gig work: An objectification perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    3. Zhao, Jinjing & Liu, Qing & Lee, Min-Kyu & Qi, Guanqiu & Liu, Yanfeng, 2024. "Consumers’ usage of errand delivery services: The effects of service quality and consumer perception," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Dong Lei & Zhen Yang & Tao Jia, 2025. "Integrating incentive-driven delivery options and time-dependent routing decisions with availability profiles," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1-40, September.
    5. Bowen Lou & Tian Lu & T. S. Raghu & Yingjie Zhang, 2025. "Unraveling Human-AI Teaming: A Review and Outlook," Papers 2504.05755, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.11562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.