IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2506.12792.html

Prosocial Design in Trust and Safety

Author

Listed:
  • David Gruning
  • Julia Kamin

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of Prosocial Design, an approach to platform design and governance that recognizes design choices influence behavior and that those choices can or should be made toward supporting healthy interactions and other prosocial outcomes. The authors discuss several core principles of Prosocial Design and its relationship to Trust and Safety and other related fields. As a primary contribution, the chapter reviews relevant research to demonstrate how Prosocial Design can be an effective approach to reducing rule-breaking and other harmful behavior and how it can help to stem the spread of harmful misinformation. Prosocial Design is a nascent and evolving field and research is still limited. The authors hope this chapter will not only inspire more research and the adoption of a prosocial design approach, but that it will also provoke discussion about the principles of Prosocial Design and its potential to support Trust and Safety.

Suggested Citation

  • David Gruning & Julia Kamin, 2025. "Prosocial Design in Trust and Safety," Papers 2506.12792, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2506.12792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.12792
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jon Roozenbeek & Sander Linden, 2019. "Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Molly Offer-Westort & Leah R. Rosenzweig & Susan Athey, 2024. "Battling the coronavirus ‘infodemic’ among social media users in Kenya and Nigeria," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(5), pages 823-834, May.
    3. George Beknazar-Yuzbashev & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Jesse McCrosky & Mateusz Stalinski, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 11644, CESifo.
    4. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & McCrosky, Jesse & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2025. "Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 741, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Chopra & Ingar Haaland & Fabian Roeben & Christopher Roth & Vanessa Sticher, 2025. "News Customization with AI," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 372, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    2. Balbuzanov, Ivan & Gars, Jared & Stalinski, Mateusz & Tjernström, Emilia, 2025. "Incentivizing Engagement: Experimental Evidence on Journalist Performance Pay," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 763, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    3. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jimenez-Duran, Rafael & Simonov, Andrey & Mateusz Stalinsk, Mateusz, 2026. "Social Media Advertising Loads as Prices," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1602, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    4. Beknazar-Yuzbashev, George & Jiménez-Durán, Rafael & Simonov, Andrey & Stalinski, Mateusz, 2026. "Social Media Advertising Loads as Prices," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 792, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    5. Ying Bao & Jessie Liu, 2025. "Beyond Takedowns: How Moderation Shapes What Gets Created," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 47-51, October.
    6. Ying Bao & Jessie Liu, 2025. "Spiral of Silence: How Neutral Moderation Polarizes Content Creation," Papers 2511.19680, arXiv.org.
    7. Andres Raphaela & Berger Lara Marie, 2025. "Digitale Medienmärkte: Was tun gegen Hassrede und Falschinformationen?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 105(3), pages 161-166.
    8. Di Lizia, Adam & Shevchenko, Lily, 2026. "Can hate speech be banned online? The effects of shutting down toxic forums on Reddit," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 790, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    9. Ivan Rendo, 2025. "Excessive Content Moderation," Working Papers 25-02, NET Institute.
    10. Sergei Guriev & Nikita Melnikov & Joana Escórcio Silva & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2025. "Mobile Broadband Accountability, Populism, and Misinformation," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 21-25, October.
    11. Balbuzanov, Ivan & Gars, Jared & Stalinski, Mateusz & Tjernstrom, Emilia, 2025. "Incentivizing Engagement : Experimental Evidence on Journalist Performance Pay," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1570, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    12. Marina Rizzi & Mateusz Stalinski, 2025. "Toxic Content and Engagement," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(04), pages 58-62, October.
    13. repec:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_698 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Jon Roozenbeek & Stefan M. Herzog & Michael Geers & Ralf Kurvers & Mubashir Sultan & Sander van der Linden, 2022. "Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by myside bias and partisanship than analytical thinking," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 17(3), pages 547-573, May.
    15. Roger D. Magarey & Christina M. Trexler, 2020. "Information: a missing component in understanding and mitigating social epidemics," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Theiss Bendixen, 2020. "How cultural evolution can inform the science of science communication—and vice versa," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    17. Cecilie S. Traberg & Jon Roozenbeek & Sander van der Linden, 2022. "Psychological Inoculation against Misinformation: Current Evidence and Future Directions," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 700(1), pages 136-151, March.
    18. Philipp Lorenz-Spreen & Stephan Lewandowsky & Cass R. Sunstein & Ralph Hertwig, 2020. "How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(11), pages 1102-1109, November.
    19. Danielle Caled & Mário J. Silva, 2022. "Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 123-159, May.
    20. Jinjin Ma & Yidi Chen & Huanya Zhu & Yiqun Gan, 2023. "Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation through an Online Game Based on the Inoculation Theory: Analyzing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Threat and Persuasion Knowledge," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, January.
    21. Carl-Anton Werner Axelsson & Mona Guath & Thomas Nygren, 2021. "Learning How to Separate Fake from Real News: Scalable Digital Tutorials Promoting Students’ Civic Online Reasoning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2506.12792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.