IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2504.03594.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Flatness-Robust Critical Bandwidth

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Kostyshak

Abstract

Critical bandwidth (CB) is used to test the multimodality of densities and regression functions, as well as for clustering methods. CB tests are known to be inconsistent if the function of interest is constant ("flat") over even a small interval, and to suffer from low power and incorrect size in finite samples if the function has a relatively small derivative over an interval. This paper proposes a solution, flatness-robust CB (FRCB), that exploits the novel observation that the inconsistency manifests only from regions consistent with the null hypothesis, and thus identifying and excluding them does not alter the null or alternative sets. I provide sufficient conditions for consistency of FRCB, and simulations of a test of regression monotonicity demonstrate the finite-sample properties of FRCB compared with CB for various regression functions. Surprisingly, FRCB performs better than CB in some cases where there are no flat regions, which can be explained by FRCB essentially giving more importance to parts of the function where there are larger violations of the null hypothesis. I illustrate the usefulness of FRCB with an empirical analysis of the monotonicity of the conditional mean function of radiocarbon age with respect to calendar age.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Kostyshak, 2025. "Flatness-Robust Critical Bandwidth," Papers 2504.03594, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.03594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.03594
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belloni, Alexandre & Chernozhukov, Victor & Chetverikov, Denis & Kato, Kengo, 2015. "Some new asymptotic theory for least squares series: Pointwise and uniform results," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 345-366.
    2. M.‐Y. Cheng & P. Hall, 1998. "Calibrating the excess mass and dip tests of modality," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(3), pages 579-589.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mona Azadkia & Leihao Chen & Fang Han, 2025. "Bias correction for Chatterjee's graph-based correlation coefficient," Papers 2508.09040, arXiv.org.
    2. Chacón, José E. & Fernández Serrano, Javier, 2024. "Bayesian taut splines for estimating the number of modes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. James Mitchell & Aubrey Poon & Dan Zhu, 2024. "Constructing density forecasts from quantile regressions: Multimodality in macrofinancial dynamics," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(5), pages 790-812, August.
    4. Daniel J. Henderson & Christopher F. Parmeter & R. Robert Russell, 2008. "Modes, weighted modes, and calibrated modes: evidence of clustering using modality tests," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(5), pages 607-638.
    5. Di, J. & Kolaczyk, E., 2010. "Complexity-penalized estimation of minimum volume sets for dependent data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(9), pages 1910-1926, October.
    6. Suren Basov & Svetlana Danilkina & David Prentice, 2020. "When Does Variety Increase with Quality?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 56(3), pages 463-487, May.
    7. Breunig, Christoph & Mammen, Enno & Simoni, Anna, 2018. "Nonparametric estimation in case of endogenous selection," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 202(2), pages 268-285.
    8. Babii, Andrii, 2020. "Honest Confidence Sets In Nonparametric Iv Regression And Other Ill-Posed Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(4), pages 658-706, August.
    9. Matias D. Cattaneo & Richard K. Crump & Max H. Farrell & Yingjie Feng, 2024. "Nonlinear Binscatter Methods," Staff Reports 1110, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    10. Michael Jansson & Demian Pouzo, 2017. "Towards a General Large Sample Theory for Regularized Estimators," Papers 1712.07248, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    11. Christoph Breunig & Stefan Hoderlein, 2016. "Nonparametric Specification Testing in Random Parameter Models," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 897, Boston College Department of Economics.
    12. Hidehiko Ichimura & Whitney K. Newey, 2022. "The influence function of semiparametric estimators," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), pages 29-61, January.
    13. Damian Kozbur, 2013. "Inference in additively separable models with a high-dimensional set of conditioning variables," ECON - Working Papers 284, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Apr 2018.
    14. Yukun Ma & Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna & Yuya Sasaki & Takuya Ura, 2023. "Doubly Robust Estimators with Weak Overlap," Papers 2304.08974, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    15. Victor Chernozhukov & Vira Semenova, 2018. "Simultaneous inference for Best Linear Predictor of the Conditional Average Treatment Effect and other structural functions," CeMMAP working papers CWP40/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    16. Christoph Breunig & Stefan Hoderlein, 2018. "Specification testing in random coefficient models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 9(3), pages 1371-1417, November.
    17. Adam Lee, 2024. "Locally Regular and Efficient Tests in Non-Regular Semiparametric Models," Papers 2403.05999, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    18. Christoph Breunig & Peter Haan, 2018. "Nonparametric Regression with Selectively Missing Covariates," Papers 1810.00411, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    19. Adam Baybutt & Manu Navjeevan, 2023. "Doubly-Robust Inference for Conditional Average Treatment Effects with High-Dimensional Controls," Papers 2301.06283, arXiv.org.
    20. Peter Horvath & Jia Li & Zhipeng Liao & Andrew J. Patton, 2022. "A consistent specification test for dynamic quantile models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(1), pages 125-151, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2504.03594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.