IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2412.18346.html

ORAN Drives Higher Returns on Investments in Urban and Suburban Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Priyanka Sharma
  • Edward J. Oughton
  • Aleksan Shanoyan

Abstract

This paper provides the first incentive analysis of open radio access networks (ORAN) using game theory. We assess strategic interactions between telecom supply chain stakeholders: mobile network operators (MNOs), network infrastructure suppliers (NIS), and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) across three procurement scenarios: (i) Traditional, (ii) Predatory as monolithic radio access networks (MRAN), and (iii) DirectOEM as ORAN. We use random forest and gradient boosting models to evaluate the optimal margins across urban, suburban, and rural U.S. regions. Results suggest that ORAN deployment consistently demonstrates higher net present value (NPV) of profits in urban and suburban regions, outperforming the traditional procurement strategy by 11% to 31%. However, rural areas present lower NPVs across all scenarios, with significant variability at the county level. This analysis offers actionable insights for telecom investment strategies, bridging technical innovation with economic outcomes and addressing strategic supply chain dynamics through a game-theoretic lens.

Suggested Citation

  • Priyanka Sharma & Edward J. Oughton & Aleksan Shanoyan, 2024. "ORAN Drives Higher Returns on Investments in Urban and Suburban Regions," Papers 2412.18346, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.18346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.18346
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Welton Araujo & Rafael Fogarolli & Marcos Seruffo & Diego Cardoso, 2018. "Deployment of small cells and a transport infrastructure concurrently for next-generation mobile access networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Rendon Schneir, Juan & Ajibulu, Ade & Konstantinou, Konstantinos & Bradford, Julie & Zimmermann, Gerd & Droste, Heinz & Canto, Rafael, 2019. "A business case for 5G mobile broadband in a dense urban area," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1-1.
    3. Michael J. Mazzeo, 2002. "Competitive Outcomes in Product-Differentiated Oligopoly," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(4), pages 716-728, November.
    4. Jonathan T. Elliott & Georges V. Houngbonon & Marc Ivaldi & Paul T. Scott, 2025. "Market Structure, Investment, and Technical Efficiencies in Mobile Telecommunications," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(5), pages 1401-1459.
    5. Jullien, Bruno & Sand-Zantman, Wilfried, 2021. "The Economics of Platforms: A Theory Guide for Competition Policy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Kim, Mi-jin & Eom, Doyoung & Lee, Heejin, 2023. "The geopolitics of next generation mobile communication standardization: The case of open RAN," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    7. Cave, Martin, 2018. "How disruptive is 5G?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 653-658.
    8. Yoshikazu Okamoto, 2009. "The Influence of Market Developments and Policies on Telecommunication Investment," OECD Digital Economy Papers 151, OECD Publishing.
    9. Rossi, Maria Alessandra, 2024. "EU technology-specific industrial policy. The case of 5G and 6G," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    10. Lehr, William & Queder, Fabian & Haucap, Justus, 2021. "5G: A new future for Mobile Network Operators, or not?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magnaghi, Mattia & Ghezzi, Antonio & Rangone, Andrea, 2025. "5G is not just another G: A review of the 5G business model and ecosystem challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Oughton, Edward J. & Amaglobeli, David & Moszoro, Marian, 2023. "What would it cost to connect the unconnected? Estimating global universal broadband infrastructure investment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    3. Edward J. Oughton & William Lehr, 2022. "Surveying 5G Techno-Economic Research to Inform the Evaluation of 6G Wireless Technologies," Papers 2201.02272, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    4. Bauer, Johannes M. & Bohlin, Erik, 2022. "Regulation and innovation in 5G markets," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    5. Edward J. Oughton & Ashutosh Jha, 2021. "Supportive 5G Infrastructure Policies are Essential for Universal 6G: Assessment using an Open-source Techno-economic Simulation Model utilizing Remote Sensing," Papers 2102.08086, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    6. Rossi, Maria Alessandra, 2022. "The advent of 5G and the non-discrimination principle," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    7. Hoeschele, Thomas & Dietzel, Christoph & Kopp, Daniel & Fitzek, Frank H.P. & Reisslein, Martin, 2021. "Importance of Internet Exchange Point (IXP) infrastructure for 5G: Estimating the impact of 5G use cases," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3).
    8. Lee, Joseph & Ahn, Jae-Hyeon & Myeong, Jaeho, 2026. "The behavioral impact of 5G adoption: Evidence from individual-level transaction data," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(2).
    9. Edward J. Oughton & Tom Russell & Jeongjin Oh & Sara Ballan & Jim W. Hall, 2023. "Global Vulnerability Assessment of Mobile Telecommunications Infrastructure to Climate Hazards using Crowdsourced Open Data," Papers 2311.04392, arXiv.org.
    10. Blind, Knut, 2025. "Standardization and Standards: Safeguards of Technological Sovereignty?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Ahokangas, Petri & Matinmikko-Blue, Marja & Yrjölä, Seppo & Hämmäinen, Heikki, 2021. "Platform configurations for local and private 5G networks in complex industrial multi-stakeholder ecosystems," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).
    12. Benseny, Jaume & Lahteenmaki, Jarno & Toyli, Juuso & Hammainen, Heikki, 2023. "Urban wireless traffic evolution: The role of new devices and the effect of policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7).
    13. Oughton, Edward J. & Comini, Niccolò & Foster, Vivien & Hall, Jim W., 2022. "Policy choices can help keep 4G and 5G universal broadband affordable," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Paul Ellickson & Sanjog Misra, 2012. "Enriching interactions: Incorporating outcome data into static discrete games," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Houngbonon, Georges Vivien & Ivaldi, Marc & Palikot, Emil & Strusani, Davide, 2023. "The Impact of Shared Telecom Infrastructure on Digital Connectivity and Inclusion," TSE Working Papers 23-1427, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Aug 2025.
    16. Stijn Ferrari & Frank Verboven & Hans Degryse, 2010. "Investment and Usage of New Technologies: Evidence from a Shared ATM Network," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(3), pages 1046-1079, June.
    17. Casson, Mark & Wadeson, Nigel, 2018. "Emerging market multinationals and internalisation theory," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1150-1160.
    18. Mendonça, Sandro & Damásio, Bruno & Charlita de Freitas, Luciano & Oliveira, Luís & Cichy, Marcin & Nicita, António, 2022. "The rise of 5G technologies and systems: A quantitative analysis of knowledge production," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(4).
    19. Vincent Malardé & Thierry Pénard, 2022. "The role of local network effects and spatial effects in the growth of digital platforms: Evidence from the carpooling site iDVROOM [Le rôle des effets de réseau locaux et des effets spatiaux dans le développement des plateformes numériques : le c," Post-Print hal-03712336, HAL.
    20. Amit Kumar Bardhan & Saad Ashraf, 2024. "More buyers or more sellers: on marketing resource allocation strategies of competing two-sided platforms," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2579-2608, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2412.18346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.