IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2311.02690.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relative Arbitrage Opportunities in an Extended Mean Field System

Author

Listed:
  • Nicole Tianjiao Yang
  • Tomoyuki Ichiba

Abstract

This paper studies relative arbitrage opportunities in a market with infinitely many interacting investors. We establish a conditional McKean-Vlasov system to study the market dynamics coupled with investors. We then provide a theoretical framework to study a mean-field system, where the mean-field terms consist of a joint distribution of wealth and strategies. The optimal relative arbitrage is characterized by the equilibrium of extended mean-field games. We show the conditions on the existence and the uniqueness of the mean field equilibrium, then prove the propagation of chaos results for the finite-player game, and demonstrate that the Nash equilibrium converges to the mean field equilibrium when the population grows to infinity.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicole Tianjiao Yang & Tomoyuki Ichiba, 2023. "Relative Arbitrage Opportunities in an Extended Mean Field System," Papers 2311.02690, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.02690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.02690
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Fernholz & Ioannis Karatzas, 2010. "On optimal arbitrage," Papers 1010.4987, arXiv.org.
    2. Ting-Kam Wong, 2015. "Optimization of relative arbitrage," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 345-382, November.
    3. Daniel Lacker & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2019. "Mean field and n‐agent games for optimal investment under relative performance criteria," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1003-1038, October.
    4. Thomas M. Cover, 1991. "Universal Portfolios," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole Tianjiao Yang & Tomoyuki Ichiba, 2024. "Finding the nonnegative minimal solutions of Cauchy PDEs in a volatility-stabilized market," Papers 2411.13558, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Steven Campbell & Qien Song & Ting-Kam Leonard Wong, 2024. "Macroscopic properties of equity markets: stylized facts and portfolio performance," Papers 2409.10859, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    2. Erhan Bayraktar & Donghan Kim & Abhishek Tilva, 2024. "Quantifying dimensional change in stochastic portfolio theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 977-1021, July.
    3. Christa Cuchiero & Walter Schachermayer & Ting-Kam Leonard Wong, 2016. "Cover's universal portfolio, stochastic portfolio theory and the numeraire portfolio," Papers 1611.09631, arXiv.org.
    4. Alexander Vervuurt & Ioannis Karatzas, 2015. "Diversity-weighted portfolios with negative parameter," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 411-432, November.
    5. Alexander Vervuurt, 2015. "Topics in Stochastic Portfolio Theory," Papers 1504.02988, arXiv.org.
    6. Zihao Zhang & Stefan Zohren & Stephen Roberts, 2020. "Deep Learning for Portfolio Optimization," Papers 2005.13665, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    7. Steven Campbell & Ting-Kam Leonard Wong, 2021. "Functional portfolio optimization in stochastic portfolio theory," Papers 2103.10925, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    8. Alexander Vervuurt & Ioannis Karatzas, 2015. "Diversity-Weighted Portfolios with Negative Parameter," Papers 1504.01026, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2015.
    9. Peter Baxendale & Ting-Kam Leonard Wong, 2019. "Random concave functions," Papers 1910.13668, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.
    10. Foster, Dean P. & Vohra, Rakesh, 1999. "Regret in the On-Line Decision Problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 7-35, October.
    11. Curatola, Giuliano, 2022. "Price impact, strategic interaction and portfolio choice," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Jin’an He & Shicheng Yin & Fangping Peng, 2024. "Weak aggregating specialist algorithm for online portfolio selection," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2405-2434, June.
    13. Peter Carr & Travis Fisher & Johannes Ruf, 2014. "On the hedging of options on exploding exchange rates," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 115-144, January.
    14. Ali Al-Aradi & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2018. "Outperformance and Tracking: Dynamic Asset Allocation for Active and Passive Portfolio Management," Papers 1803.05819, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2018.
    15. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    16. Chao Deng & Xizhi Su & Chao Zhou, 2024. "Peer effect and dynamic ALM games among insurers," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 18, number 11, September.
    17. Fabio Stella & Alfonso Ventura, 2011. "Defensive online portfolio selection," International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 88-105.
    18. Gu Wang & Jiaxuan Ye, 2023. "Fund Managers’ Competition for Investment Flows Based on Relative Performance," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 605-643, August.
    19. Fereydooni, Ali & Barak, Sasan & Asaad Sajadi, Seyed Mehrzad, 2024. "A novel online portfolio selection approach based on pattern matching and ESG factors," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    20. Jarrod Wilcox, 2020. "Better portfolios with higher moments," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(7), pages 569-580, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.02690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.