IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2305.07559.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

PRIME: A Price-Reverting Impact Model of a cryptocurrency Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher J. Cho
  • Timothy J. Norman
  • Manuel Nunes

Abstract

In a financial exchange, market impact is a measure of the price change of an asset following a transaction. This is an important element of market microstructure, which determines the behaviour of the market following a trade. In this paper, we first provide a discussion on the market impact observed in the BTC/USD Futures market, then we present a novel multi-agent market simulation that can follow an underlying price series, whilst maintaining the ability to reproduce the market impact observed in the market in an explainable manner. This simulation of the financial exchange allows the model to interact realistically with market participants, helping its users better estimate market slippage as well as the knock-on consequences of their market actions. In turn, it allows various stakeholders such as industrial practitioners, governments and regulators to test their market hypotheses, without deploying capital or destabilising the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher J. Cho & Timothy J. Norman & Manuel Nunes, 2023. "PRIME: A Price-Reverting Impact Model of a cryptocurrency Exchange," Papers 2305.07559, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2305.07559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.07559
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrea Coletta & Aymeric Moulin & Svitlana Vyetrenko & Tucker Balch, 2022. "Learning to simulate realistic limit order book markets from data as a World Agent," Papers 2210.09897, arXiv.org.
    2. J. Donier & J. Bonart & I. Mastromatteo & J.-P. Bouchaud, 2015. "A fully consistent, minimal model for non-linear market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 1109-1121, July.
    3. Jonathan Donier & Julius Bonart & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2014. "A fully consistent, minimal model for non-linear market impact," Papers 1412.0141, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2015.
    4. Frank McGroarty & Ash Booth & Enrico Gerding & V. L. Raju Chinthalapati, 2019. "High frequency trading strategies, market fragility and price spikes: an agent based model perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 282(1), pages 217-244, November.
    5. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Marc Mezard & Marc Potters, 2002. "Statistical properties of stock order books: empirical results and models," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 251-256.
    6. Svitlana Vyetrenko & David Byrd & Nick Petosa & Mahmoud Mahfouz & Danial Dervovic & Manuela Veloso & Tucker Hybinette Balch, 2019. "Get Real: Realism Metrics for Robust Limit Order Book Market Simulations," Papers 1912.04941, arXiv.org.
    7. Jim Gatheral, 2010. "No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(7), pages 749-759.
    8. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Marc Mezard & Marc Potters, 2002. "Statistical properties of stock order books: empirical results and models," Science & Finance (CFM) working paper archive 0203511, Science & Finance, Capital Fund Management.
    9. Mahanti, Sriketan & Nashikkar, Amrut & Subrahmanyam, Marti & Chacko, George & Mallik, Gaurav, 2008. "Latent liquidity: A new measure of liquidity, with an application to corporate bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 272-298, May.
    10. Frédéric Abergel & Aymen Jedidi, 2013. "A Mathematical Approach To Order Book Modeling," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(05), pages 1-40.
    11. Jonathan Donier & Julius Bonart, 2014. "A Million Metaorder Analysis of Market Impact on the Bitcoin," Papers 1412.4503, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    12. Damian Eduardo Taranto & Giacomo Bormetti & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Fabrizio Lillo & Bence Toth, 2016. "Linear models for the impact of order flow on prices I. Propagators: Transient vs. History Dependent Impact," Papers 1602.02735, arXiv.org.
    13. Frédéric Abergel & Aymen Jedidi, 2013. "A Mathematical Approach to Order Book Modelling," Post-Print hal-00621253, HAL.
    14. Frederic Abergel & Aymen Jedidi, 2010. "A Mathematical Approach to Order Book Modeling," Papers 1010.5136, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2013.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Derksen & B. Kleijn & R. de Vilder, 2019. "Clearing price distributions in call auctions," Papers 1904.07583, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2019.
    2. Ioane Muni Toke, 2014. "Exact and asymptotic solutions of the call auction problem," Working Papers hal-01061857, HAL.
    3. Rama Cont & Pierre Degond & Xuan Lifan, 2023. "A mathematical framework for modelling order book dynamics," Working Papers hal-03968767, HAL.
    4. Mohammad Zare & Omid Naghshineh Arjmand & Erfan Salavati & Adel Mohammadpour, 2021. "An Agent‐Based model for Limit Order Book: Estimation and simulation," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(1), pages 1112-1121, January.
    5. Ioane Muni Toke, 2015. "Exact and asymptotic solutions of the call auction problem," Post-Print hal-01061857, HAL.
    6. Kyungsub Lee & Byoung Ki Seo, 2021. "Analytic formula for option margin with liquidity costs under dynamic delta hedging," Papers 2103.15302, arXiv.org.
    7. Ioane Muni Toke, 2014. "Exact and asymptotic solutions of the call auction problem," Papers 1407.4512, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2014.
    8. Rama Cont & Pierre Degond & Lifan Xuan, 2023. "A mathematical framework for modelling order book dynamics," Papers 2302.01169, arXiv.org.
    9. Aleksejus Kononovicius & Julius Ruseckas, 2018. "Order book model with herd behavior exhibiting long-range memory," Papers 1809.02772, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    10. Kononovicius, Aleksejus & Ruseckas, Julius, 2019. "Order book model with herd behavior exhibiting long-range memory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 171-191.
    11. Ioane Muni Toke, 2015. "Stationary distribution of the volume at the best quote in a Poisson order book model," Papers 1502.03871, arXiv.org.
    12. Ioane Muni Toke, 2017. "Stationary Distribution Of The Volume At The Best Quote In A Poisson Order Book Model," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(06), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Mohammed Salek & Damien Challet & Ioane Muni Toke, 2023. "Price impact in equity auctions: zero, then linear," Working Papers hal-03938660, HAL.
    14. Yuki Sato & Kiyoshi Kanazawa, 2023. "Exact solution to a generalised Lillo-Mike-Farmer model with heterogeneous order-splitting strategies," Papers 2306.13378, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    15. Emilio Said, 2022. "Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice," Working Papers hal-03668669, HAL.
    16. Zijian Shi & John Cartlidge, 2023. "Neural Stochastic Agent-Based Limit Order Book Simulation: A Hybrid Methodology," Papers 2303.00080, arXiv.org.
    17. Aurélien Alfonsi & Pierre Blanc, 2016. "Dynamic optimal execution in a mixed-market-impact Hawkes price model," Post-Print hal-00971369, HAL.
    18. Ke Xu & Martin D. Gould & Sam D. Howison, 2019. "Multi-Level Order-Flow Imbalance in a Limit Order Book," Papers 1907.06230, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    19. Dupret, Jean-Loup & Hainaut, Donatien, 2023. "Optimal liquidation under indirect price impact with propagator," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2023012, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Fabrizio Lillo, 2021. "Order flow and price formation," Papers 2105.00521, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2305.07559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.