IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2303.07468.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distributionally Robust Principal-Agent Problems and Optimality of Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Zhang

Abstract

We propose a distributionally robust principal agent formulation, which generalizes some common variants of worst-case and Bayesian principal agent problems. We construct a theoretical framework to certify whether any surjective contract family is optimal, and bound its sub-optimality. We then apply the framework to study the optimality of affine contracts. We show with geometric intuition that these simple contract families are optimal when the surplus function is convex and there exists a technology type that is simultaneously least productive and least efficient. We also provide succinct expressions to quantify the optimality gap of any surplus function, based on its concave biconjugate. This new framework complements the current literature in two ways: invention of a new toolset; understanding affine contracts' performance in a larger landscape. Our results also shed light on the technical roots of this question: why are there more positive results in the recent literature that show simple contracts' optimality in robust settings rather than stochastic settings? This phenomenon is related to two technical facts: the sum of quasi-concave functions is not quasi-concave, and the maximization and expectation operators do not commute.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Zhang, 2023. "Distributionally Robust Principal-Agent Problems and Optimality of Contracts," Papers 2303.07468, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2303.07468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.07468
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisabetta Iossa & David Martimort, 2011. "The Theory of Incentives Applied to the Transport Sector," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. David Simchi-Levi & Nikolaos Trichakis & Peter Yun Zhang, 2019. "Designing Response Supply Chain Against Bioattacks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1246-1268, September.
    3. Myerson, Roger B., 1982. "Optimal coordination mechanisms in generalized principal-agent problems," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 67-81, June.
    4. Xin Chen & Melvyn Sim & Peng Sun & Jiawei Zhang, 2008. "A Linear Decision-Based Approximation Approach to Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(2), pages 344-357, April.
    5. Carroll, Gabriel & Meng, Delong, 2016. "Robust contracting with additive noise," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 586-604.
    6. Holmstrom, Bengt & Milgrom, Paul, 1987. "Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 303-328, March.
    7. Dan A. Iancu & Mayank Sharma & Maxim Sviridenko, 2013. "Supermodularity and Affine Policies in Dynamic Robust Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 941-956, August.
    8. Dimitris Bertsimas & Vineet Goyal & Xu Andy Sun, 2011. "A Geometric Characterization of the Power of Finite Adaptability in Multistage Stochastic and Adaptive Optimization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 24-54, February.
    9. Amir Ardestani-Jaafari & Erick Delage, 2016. "Robust Optimization of Sums of Piecewise Linear Functions with Application to Inventory Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 474-494, April.
    10. Omar El Housni & Vineet Goyal, 2021. "On the Optimality of Affine Policies for Budgeted Uncertainty Sets," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 674-711, May.
    11. Sylvain Chassang, 2013. "Calibrated Incentive Contracts," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(5), pages 1935-1971, September.
    12. Gabriel Carroll, 2015. "Robustness and Linear Contracts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(2), pages 536-563, February.
    13. Daniel Walton & Gabriel Carroll, 2022. "A General Framework for Robust Contracting Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(5), pages 2129-2159, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felipe Balmaceda, 2020. "Contracting with moral hazard, adverse selection and risk neutrality: when does one size fit all?," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 49(2), pages 601-637, June.
    2. Jianzhe Zhen & Ahmadreza Marandi & Danique de Moor & Dick den Hertog & Lieven Vandenberghe, 2022. "Disjoint Bilinear Optimization: A Two-Stage Robust Optimization Perspective," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2410-2427, September.
    3. Garrett, Daniel F., 2020. "Payoff Implications of Incentive Contracting," TSE Working Papers 20-1140, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    4. David Simchi-Levi & Nikolaos Trichakis & Peter Yun Zhang, 2019. "Designing Response Supply Chain Against Bioattacks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1246-1268, September.
    5. Hamed Mamani & Shima Nassiri & Michael R. Wagner, 2017. "Closed-Form Solutions for Robust Inventory Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1625-1643, May.
    6. Escobar, Juan F. & Pulgar, Carlos, 2017. "Motivating with simple contracts," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 192-214.
    7. Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernan-Gonzalez & Yao Thibaut Kpegli & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2023. "Against the Odds! The Tradeoff Between Risk and Incentives is Alive and Well," Working Papers 2305, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    8. Barron, Daniel & Georgiadis, George & Swinkels, Jeroen M., 2020. "Optimal contracts with a risk-taking agent," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    9. Bougheas, Spiros & Wang, Tianxi, 2021. "A theory of outside equity: Financing multiple projects," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Villeneuve, Stéphane & Abi Jaber, Eduardo, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," TSE Working Papers 22-1363, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    11. Omar El Housni & Vineet Goyal, 2021. "On the Optimality of Affine Policies for Budgeted Uncertainty Sets," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 674-711, May.
    12. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," Post-Print hal-03783062, HAL.
    13. Carroll, Gabriel & Meng, Delong, 2016. "Robust contracting with additive noise," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 586-604.
    14. Lagziel, David & Lehrer, Ehud, 2018. "Reward schemes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 21-40.
    15. Eduardo Abi Jaber & St'ephane Villeneuve, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," Papers 2209.10878, arXiv.org.
    16. Natalie Collina & Aaron Roth & Han Shao, 2023. "Efficient Prior-Free Mechanisms for No-Regret Agents," Papers 2311.07754, arXiv.org.
    17. Carroll, Gabriel & Bolte, Lukas, 2023. "Robust contracting under double moral hazard," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(4), November.
    18. Tal Alon & Paul Dutting & Yingkai Li & Inbal Talgam-Cohen, 2022. "Bayesian Analysis of Linear Contracts," Papers 2211.06850, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    19. Martin Dumav, 2021. "Moral Hazard, Dynamic Incentives, and Ambiguous Perceptions," Papers 2110.15229, arXiv.org.
    20. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," Working Papers hal-03783062, HAL.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2303.07468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.