IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2206.00640.html

The Evolution of Investor Activism in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Ryo Sakai

Abstract

Activist investors have gradually become a catalyst for change in Japanese companies. This study examines the impact of activist board representation on firm performance in Japan. I focus on the only two Japanese companies with activist board representation: Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. ("Kawasaki") and Olympus Corporation ("Olympus"). Overall, I document significant benefits from the decision to engage with activists at these companies. The target companies experience greater short- and long-term abnormal stock returns following the activist engagement. Moreover, I show operational improvements as measured by return on assets and return on equity. Activist board members also associate with important changes in payout policy that help explain the positive stock returns. My findings support the notion that Japanese companies should consider engagements with activist investors to transform and improve their businesses. Such interactions can lead to innovative and forward-thinking policies that create value for Japanese businesses and their stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryo Sakai, 2022. "The Evolution of Investor Activism in Japan," Papers 2206.00640, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2206.00640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.00640
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Becht & Julian Franks & Jeremy Grant & Hannes F. Wagner, 2017. "Returns to Hedge Fund Activism: An International Study," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 30(9), pages 2933-2971.
    2. Hamao, Yasushi & Matos, Pedro, 2018. "U.S.-style investor activism in Japan: The first ten years?," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 29-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fujitani, Ryosuke & Ito, Akitoshi & Iwata, Kiyonori, 2025. "From conflict to coordination: the governance role of bank-involved investor cliques in Japan," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PD).
    2. Julian FRANKS & Colin MAYER & Hideaki MIYAJIMA & Ryo OGAWA, 2018. "Stock Repurchases and Corporate Control: Evidence from Japan," Discussion papers 18074, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. repec:osf:metaar:g94sx_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Josef Bajzik, 2023. "Does Shareholder Activism Have a Long-Lasting Impact on Company Value? A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers 2023/10, Czech National Bank, Research and Statistics Department.
    5. Bajzík, Josef & Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Novak, Jiri, 2023. "Does Shareholder Activism Create Value? A Meta-Analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 18233, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Gillan, Stuart L. & Nguyen, Nga & Nishikawa, Takeshi, 2023. "Heterogeneity in shareholder activism: Evidence from Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    7. Hiroaki Miyachi & Fumiko Takeda, 2021. "Hedge Fund Activism in Japan under the Stewardship and Corporate Governance Codes," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 27(2), pages 119-130, May.
    8. Bajzik, Josef, 2023. "Is the role of shareholder activism in corporate governance overestimated?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    9. Hideaki Miyajima & Ryo Ogawa & Takuji Saito, 2016. "Changes in the Corporate Governance System and Presidential Turnover," Working Papers halshs-01680409, HAL.
    10. Roller, Slavek, 2021. "Institutional investors’ sustainability policies and the outcomes for the healthcare sector portfolios," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(10), pages 1367-1376.
    11. Dasgupta, Amil & Fos, Vyacheslav & Sautner, Zacharias, 2021. "Institutional investors and corporate governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112114, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Khan, Zazy, 2015. "Activist Hedge Funds: Evidence from the Recent Financial Crisis," MPRA Paper 72025, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 May 2016.
    13. Marco BECHT & Julian FRANKS & Hideaki MIYAJIMA & Kazunori SUZUKI, 2021. "Outsourcing Active Ownership in Japan," Discussion papers 21051, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    14. Sai, Masumi & Yamada, Kazuo, 2025. "Does passive ownership affect corporate governance? Evidence from the Bank of Japan’s ETF purchasing program," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    15. Oehler, Andreas & Schmitz, Jonas Tobias, 2021. "Does intensified communication of hedge funds with letters affect abnormal returns?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 127-142.
    16. Kostaris, Konstantinos & Andrikopoulos, Andreas, 2023. "Brokers in beneficial ownership: A network approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Ryan Flugum & Matthew E. Souther, 2020. "External monitoring and returns to hedge fund activist campaigns," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 97-140, January.
    18. Tamas Barko & Martijn Cremers & Luc Renneboog, 2022. "Shareholder Engagement on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 777-812, October.
    19. Krishnan, C.N.V. & Partnoy, Frank & Thomas, Randall S., 2016. "The second wave of hedge fund activism: The importance of reputation, clout, and expertise," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 296-314.
    20. Cao, Jerry & Wang, Hanyang & Zhou, Sili, 2022. "Soft activism and corporate dividend policy: Evidence from institutional investors site visits," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    21. Marco Becht & Yuliya Kamisarenka & Anete Pajuste, 2018. "Loyalty Shares with Tenure Voting - a Coasian bargain? Evidence from the Loi Florange Experiment," Working Papers ECARES 2018-10, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2206.00640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.