IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2107.07552.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Health, Technology, and Human Rights: Lessons from Digital Contact Tracing

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Carnovale
  • Khahlil Louisy

Abstract

To mitigate inefficiencies in manual contact tracing processes, Digital Contact Tracing and Exposure Notifications Systems were developed for use as public-interest technologies during the SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic. Effective implementation of these tools requires alignment across several factors, including local regulations and policies and trust in government and public health officials. Careful consideration should also be made to minimize any potential conflicts with existing processes in public health which has demonstrated effectiveness. Four unique cases-of Ireland, Guayaquil, Haiti, and the Philippines-detailed in this paper will highlight the importance of upholding the principles of Scientific Validity, Necessity, Time Boundedness, and Proportionality.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Carnovale & Khahlil Louisy, 2021. "Public Health, Technology, and Human Rights: Lessons from Digital Contact Tracing," Papers 2107.07552, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2107.07552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.07552
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Smriti Mallapaty, 2020. "How deadly is the coronavirus? Scientists are close to an answer," Nature, Nature, vol. 582(7813), pages 467-468, June.
    2. Kass, N.E., 2001. "An ethics framework for public health," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(11), pages 1776-1782.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melissa Chinchilla & Mariana C. Arcaya, 2017. "Using Health Impact Assessment as an Interdisciplinary Teaching Tool," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Vallgårda, Signild, 2012. "Nudge—A new and better way to improve health?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 200-203.
    3. Sun, Xiaoqian & Wandelt, Sebastian & Zhang, Anming, 2021. "Vaccination passports: Challenges for a future of air transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 394-401.
    4. Sean G. Young, 2023. "Hidden Costs of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-7, April.
    5. Joanna Holub-Iwan, 2021. "Management Information Systems of Public Health Behaviors based on Evidence in Medicine and Health Management," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 623-643.
    6. Bombard, Yvonne & Abelson, Julia & Simeonov, Dorina & Gauvin, Francois-Pierre, 2011. "Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 135-144, July.
    7. Laflamme, Lucie & Hasselberg, Marie & Reimers, Anne-Mari & Cavalini, Luciana Tricai & Ponce de Leon, Antonio, 2009. "Social determinants of child and adolescent traffic-related and intentional injuries: A multilevel study in Stockholm County," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 1826-1834, May.
    8. Lorenzo Gianquintieri & Maria Antonia Brovelli & Andrea Pagliosa & Rodolfo Bonora & Giuseppe Maria Sechi & Enrico Gianluca Caiani, 2021. "Geospatial Correlation Analysis between Air Pollution Indicators and Estimated Speed of COVID-19 Diffusion in the Lombardy Region (Italy)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Paul Ndebele & Hina Shaikh & Nino Paichadze & Imran Bari & David Michaels & Carlos Santos Burgoa & Adnan A. Hyder, 2020. "Commercial determinants of health: an ethical exploration," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(7), pages 1123-1132, September.
    10. Renu Khanna, 2013. "Ethical Issues in Community Based Monitoring of Health Programmes: Reflections from India," Working Papers id:5587, eSocialSciences.
    11. Xiaojun Zhang & Fanfan Wang & Changwen Zhu & Zhiqiang Wang, 2019. "Willingness to Self-Isolate When Facing a Pandemic Risk: Model, Empirical Test, and Policy Recommendations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Chakrabarty, Debajyoti & Bhatia, Bhanu & Jayasinghe, Maneka & Low, David, 2023. "Relative deprivation, inequality and the Covid-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    13. Maria Chiara Demartini & Valentina Beretta, 2020. "La gestione della cronicit? nelle aziende sanitarie: una rassegna della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(116), pages 7-30.
    14. Thierry Hurlimann & Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas & Abha Saxena & Gerardo Zamora & Béatrice Godard, 2017. "Ethical issues in the development and implementation of nutrition-related public health policies and interventions: A scoping review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Chiara Natalie Focacci & Pak Hung Lam & Yu Bai, 2022. "Choosing the right COVID-19 indicator: crude mortality, case fatality, and infection fatality rates influence policy preferences, behaviour, and understanding," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Chris Jenkins & Marta Lomazzi & Heather Yeatman & Bettina Borisch, 2016. "Global Public Health: A Review and Discussion of the Concepts, Principles and Roles of Global Public Health in Today's Society," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(3), pages 332-339, September.
    17. Xiaolong Hou & Yang Jiao & Leilei Shen & Zhuo Chen, 2024. "The lasting impact of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: COVID-19 vaccination hesitation among African Americans," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 1-33, June.
    18. Fourie, Carina & Biller-Andorno, Nikola & Wild, Verina, 2014. "Systematically evaluating the impact of diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) on health care delivery: A matrix of ethical implications," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 157-164.
    19. Michel Abramowicz & Ariane Szafarz, 2019. "Ethics of Randomized Controlled Trials: Should Economists Care about Equipoise?," Working Papers CEB 19-017, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Holmes-Watts, Tania & Watts, Scotney, 2008. "Legal frameworks for and the practice of participatory natural resources management in South Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(7-8), pages 435-443, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2107.07552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.