The Calculus of Expected Loss: Backtesting Parameter-Based Expected Loss in a Basel II Framework
The dependency structure of credit risk parameters is a key driver for capital consumption and receives regulatory and scientific attention. The impact of parameter imperfections on the quality of expected loss (EL) in the sense of a fair, unbiased estimate of risk expenses however is barely covered. So far there are no established backtesting procedures for EL, quantifying its impact with regards to pricing or risk adjusted profitability measures. In this paper, a practically oriented, top-down approach to assess the quality of EL by backtesting with a properly defined risk measure is introduced. In a first step, the concept of risk expenses (Cost of Risk) has to be extended beyond the classical provisioning view, towards a more adequate capital consumption approach (Impact of Risk, IoR). On this basis, the difference between parameter-based EL and actually reported Impact of Risk is decomposed into its key components. The proposed method will deepen the understanding of practical properties of EL, reconciles the EL with a clearly defined and observable risk measure and provides a link between upcoming IFRS 9 accounting standards for loan loss provisioning with IRBA regulatory capital requirements. The method is robust irrespective whether parameters are simple, expert based values or highly predictive and perfectly calibrated IRBA compliant methods, as long as parameters and default identification procedures are stable.
|Date of creation:||Nov 2012|
|Date of revision:||Aug 2013|
|Publication status:||Published in Reitgruber, W. (2013). Expected loss and Impact of Risk: backtesting parameter-based expected loss in a Basel II framework. The Journal of Risk Model Validation 7(3), 59-84|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://arxiv.org/|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Simone Farinelli & Mykhaylo Shkolnikov, 2012. "Two Models of Stochastic Loss Given Default," Papers 1205.5369, arXiv.org, revised May 2012.
- Edward I. Altman & Brooks Brady & Andrea Resti & Andrea Sironi, 2005. "The Link between Default and Recovery Rates: Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Implications," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(6), pages 2203-2228, November.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1211.4946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.