IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ahe/dtaehe/1012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Una aproximación histórica y analítica al pensamiento económico de Jovellanos

Author

Listed:
  • Vicent Llombart Rosa

    (Universidad de Valencia)

Abstract

El siguiente texto tiene dos objetivos complementarios: por un lado, revisar los múltiples estudios realizados sobre el pensamiento económico de Jovellanos desde la publicación del Informe de Ley Agraria en 1795 hasta el presente y, por otro, exponer nuestra propia visión sobre el entramado analítico y el significado del pensamiento del asturiano. El trabajo se ordena en cinco secciones: la reseña de las reacciones iniciales al Informe, la primera; las reflexiones aparecidas desde las Cortes de Cádiz hasta las de la década de 1980, la segunda; los estudios actuales, destacando la obra Economía y economistas españoles, la tercera; y, por último, en las dos secciones finales, se presenta nuestro propio análisis, sin duda favorecido por las visiones anteriores. Se concluye destacando que Jovellanos no fue un liberal en sentido estricto ni un epígono de Adam Smith; la letra y el espíritu de sus escritos económicos, le caracterizan como un “liberal intervencionista”, bien alejado de las usuales nociones de mercantilismo, fisiocracia y liberalismo económico

Suggested Citation

  • Vicent Llombart Rosa, 2010. "Una aproximación histórica y analítica al pensamiento económico de Jovellanos," Documentos de Trabajo (DT-AEHE) 1012, Asociación Española de Historia Económica.
  • Handle: RePEc:ahe:dtaehe:1012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aehe.es/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/dt-aehe-1012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gilbert Faccarello, 2005. "A tale of two traditions: Pierre Force's Self-interest before Adam Smith," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 701-712.
    2. Llombart, Vicent, 2008. "La supuesta alternativa fisiócrata de Juan à lvarez Guerra al Informe de Ley Agraria de Jovellanos. Una reconsideración," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(3), pages 473-488, January.
    3. Force,Pierre, 2003. "Self-Interest before Adam Smith," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521830607, October.
    4. Jimena Hurtado, 2005. "Pity, sympathy and self-interest: review of Pierre Force's Self-interest before Adam Smith," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 713-721.
    5. Astigarraga, Jesús & Usoz, Javier, 2007. "Una alternativa fisiócrata al Informe de Ley Agraria de Jovellanos," Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(3), pages 427-458, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madarász, Aladár, 2014. "A láthatatlan kéz - szemelvények egy metafora történetéből [The invisible hand - extracts from the history of a metaphor]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 801-844.
    2. Matthias P. Hühn & Claus Dierksmeier, 2016. "Will the Real A. Smith Please Stand Up!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 119-132, June.
    3. Paul Slack, 2009. "Material progress and the challenge of affluence in seventeenth‐century England," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 62(3), pages 576-603, August.
    4. José L. Ramos-Gorostiza, 2009. "El medio físico en el pensamiento agrario español: del arbitrismo al regeneracionismo," Historia Agraria. Revista de Agricultura e Historia Rural, Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria, issue 49, pages 13-40, december.
    5. Jimena Hurtado, 2005. "The Utilitarian Foundations Of The Economic Approach To Human Behavior," Documentos CEDE 003633, Universidad de los Andes – Facultad de Economía – CEDE.
    6. Avner Offer, 2012. "A Warrant for Pain: Caveat Emptor vs. the Duty of Care in American Medicine, c. 1970-2010," Oxford University Economic and Social History Series _102, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    7. Benoît Walraevens, 2010. "Adam Smith’s economics and the Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. The language of commerce," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 18(1), pages 11-32.
    8. Klump, Rainer & Pilz, Lars & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "The Formation Of A “Spirit Of Capitalism” In Upper Germany: Leonhard Fronsperger’S (1564) “On The Praise Of Self-Interest”," OSF Preprints 4ztvd, Center for Open Science.
    9. Oswin Krüger Ruiz, 2020. "The Self According to Others: Explaining Social Preferences with Social Approbation," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 38-54, December.
    10. Schliesser, Eric, 2011. "Reading Adam Smith after Darwin: On the evolution of propensities, institutions, and sentiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 14-22, January.
    11. Belli, Luca, 2015. "A heterostakeholder cooperation for sustainable internet policymaking," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 4(2), pages 1-21.
    12. Philippe Steiner, 2008. "Foucault, Weber and the history of the economic subject," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 503-527.
    13. Martín Martí N, Victoriano & San Emeterio Martá N, Nieves, 2014. "Baltasar Gracián: El concepto de interés propio como guía de la acción humana/Baltasar Gracián: The Concept of Self- Interest as a Motive for Human Action," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 32, pages 67-82, Enero.
    14. Elazar, Yiftah, 2022. "Adam Smith and the Wealth-Worshipping Spectator," OSF Preprints j5pt6, Center for Open Science.
    15. Javier Usoz, 2008. "La política ilustrada y el libre comercio de granos: las ‘Reflexiones económico-políticas’ (1768) de Tomás Anzano," Historia Agraria. Revista de Agricultura e Historia Rural, Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria, issue 44, pages 21-51, april.
    16. Walraevens, Benoît & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Book Review: “Self-Love, Egoism And The Selfish Hypothesis. Key Debates From Eighteenth-Century British Moral Philosophy” By Christian Maurer," OSF Preprints pr6q5, Center for Open Science.
    17. Jesús Astigarraga, 2010. "Ramón de Salas y la difusión de la fisiocracia en España," Historia Agraria. Revista de Agricultura e Historia Rural, Sociedad Española de Historia Agraria, issue 52, pages 75-102, december.
    18. Ötsch, Walter, 2020. "Imagination und Bildlichkeit in der Geschichte der Wirtschaftstheorie: Von Adam Smith bis zur frühen Neoklassik," Working Paper Series 63, Cusanus Hochschule für Gesellschaftsgestaltung, Institut für Ökonomie.
    19. Marek Hudík, 2015. "Homo Economicus and Homo Stramineus," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 154-172.
    20. Marie-Laure Djelic, 2007. "The 'Ethics of Competition' or the Moral Foundations of Contemporary Capitalism," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/c155l8cuu87, Sciences Po.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pensamiento económico; Jovellanos; Adam Smith; Informe de Ley Agraria; liberalismo económico; intervencionismo;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General
    • N50 - Economic History - - Agriculture, Natural Resources, Environment and Extractive Industries - - - General, International, or Comparative

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahe:dtaehe:1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeheeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antònia Morey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeheeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.