IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331667.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural trade liberalization –steps taken by the EU and how Finland will face them

Author

Listed:
  • Kerkelä , Leena

Abstract

The challenges in Finnish and European agricultural markets are best understood by those indications that have been expressed in international arena of WTO negotiations. Despite the stalemate of the Doha Round negotiations, the EU has clearly committed to adapting to more liberal environment in global agricultural trade. Along these lines, EU has committed to decreasing trade distorting policy instruments, export subsidies and domestic policy instruments In this paper, these two policy reforms within the European agricultural policy, are studied in global trade framework. Of the Doha agriculture package they are those elements that seem to be realizing despite the other pillars. The reform in domestic support has been analysed as the decoupling decision in CAP 2003 reform. The commitment of export subsidies is assumed to be global. Both the reforms are connected to WTO negotiations. Global trade model, GTAP is applied to numerical evaluations of the policy reforms. Results are studied especially from the viewpoint of Finland and reflected to other studies both in the area of Doha Development Round as well as CAP reform. Results show that within the EU, both the reforms decrease agricultural production and pave way for more liberal trading environment even though they do not in itself have any incentives for more imports or exports. Effects vary in their magnitude between member countries. Both the reforms decrease world trade and have a positive impact on world market prices of agricultural products. Results are in line with international studies in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerkelä , Leena, 2007. "Agricultural trade liberalization –steps taken by the EU and how Finland will face them," Conference papers 331667, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331667/files/3138.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mussa, Michael, 1974. "Tariffs and the Distribution of Income: The Importance of Factor Specificity, Substitutability, and Intensity in the Short and Long Run," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 82(6), pages 1191-1203, Nov.-Dec..
    2. Morris Bornstein, 2001. "Post-privatisation Enterprise Restructuring," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 189-203.
    3. Shoven, John B & Whalley, John, 1984. "Applied General-Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade: An Introduction and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 1007-1051, September.
    4. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    5. Lubomír Lízal & Jan Svejnar, 2002. "Investment, Credit Rationing, And The Soft Budget Constraint: Evidence From Czech Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 84(2), pages 353-370, May.
    6. Ronald W. Jones, 2000. "Globalization and the Theory of Input Trade," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026210086x, December.
    7. Ronald W. Jones, 2002. "Trade Theory and Factor Intensities: An Interpretive Essay," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(4), pages 581-603, November.
    8. Dunning, John H., 2000. "The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 163-190, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wittwer, Glyn, 2011. "Water buybacks and drought in the Murray-Darling Basin of Australia: confusing policy and catastrophe," Conference papers 332169, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. María C. Latorre, 2013. "On the Differential Behaviour of National and Multinational Firms: A Within- and Across-sectors Approach," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(10), pages 1294-1317, October.
    3. Latorre, María C. & Bajo-Rubio, Oscar & Gómez-Plana, Antonio G., 2009. "The effects of multinationals on host economies: A CGE approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 851-864, September.
    4. Lin, Hsing-Chun & Lee, Duu-Hwa & Hsu, Sheng-Ming & Chou, Li-Chen & Chang, Ching-Cheng & Hsu, Shih-Shun, 2010. "Agricultural and Macroeconomic Impact of Rising Imported Grain Prices on Taiwan," Conference papers 332027, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Zhou, Jing & Latorre, Maria C., 2013. "How FDI influences the triangular trade pattern among China, East Asia and the U.S.? A CGE analysis of the sector of Electronics in China," Conference papers 332317, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Osman, Rehab Osman Mohamed, 2012. "The EU Economic Partnership Agreements with Southern Africa: a computable general equilibrium analysis," Economics PhD Theses 0412, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    7. Martin, Will, 2021. "Tools for measuring the full impacts of agricultural interventions," IFPRI-MCC technical papers 2, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Mutambatsere, Emelly, 2006. "Trade Policy Reforms in the Cereals Sector of the SADC Region: Implications on Food Security," Working Papers 127055, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    9. Travis Warziniack & David Finnoff & Jonathan Bossenbroek & Jason Shogren & David Lodge, 2011. "Stepping Stones for Biological Invasion: A Bioeconomic Model of Transferable Risk," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 50(4), pages 605-627, December.
    10. Ahmed, Vaqar & O' Donoghue, Cathal, 2007. "CGE-Microsimulation Modelling: A Survey," MPRA Paper 9307, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Zhai, Fan, 2007. "Armington Meets Melitz: Introducing Firm Heterogeneity in Global CGE Model of Trade," Conference papers 331646, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Lee, Hiro & Roland-Holst, David W., 1998. "Prelude to the pacific century: Overview of the region, leading issues, and methodology," MPRA Paper 82339, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How Far Have We Come?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 413-440, April.
    14. Roland-Holst, David & Mensbrugghe, Dominique van der & Tarp, Finn & Rand, John & Barslund, Mikkel, 2002. "Prototype Specification for a Real Computable General Equilibrium Model," MPRA Paper 29788, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Padella, Monica & Finco, Adele & Tyner, Wallace E., 2011. "Analysis of the Impacts of EU Biofuels Programs using a GTAP model," Conference papers 332124, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Nabil Annabi & John Cockburn & Bernard Decaluwé, 2006. "Functional Forms and Parametrization of CGE Models," Working Papers MPIA 2006-04, PEP-MPIA.
    17. Taiwo BOLARINWA, 2024. "Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Models: A Comprehensive Review and Future Directions," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(1), pages 158-167, February.
    18. Clements, Kenneth W. & Vo, Long Hai & Mariano, Marc Jim, 2021. "Modelling import penetration," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Anderson, Kym, 2004. "Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?," Working Papers 14574, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Li, Meng & Yang, Liang, 2012. "Rigid wage-setting and the effect of a supply shock, fiscal and monetary policies on Chinese economy by a CGE analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1858-1869.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.