IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr10/207246.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gas Consumption Information: A Substitute for Congestion Pricing?

Author

Listed:
  • Rouhani, Omid M.

Abstract

The low price elasticity of gasoline demand has been shown in different studies. People‟s weak perception about how much they spend on fuel is considered as an important reason. The purpose of this study is to show how information about gas consumption may change people‟s behavior. Congestion pricing has been successful in terms of reducing demand and even changing people‟s decisions. People perceive this pricing as out of pocket cost and take that into account while making decisions. A similar procedure can be implemented for fuel costs. On-line information from transportation networks can be used to estimate the gas consumption cost for each route, using on-road banners or GPS devices. The idea is that as a result of becoming informed about their gas consumption increase when entering traffic congestion, people may take an alternative route or decide not to travel at all. Although it is not possible to estimate the exact change in the price elasticity of gas by introducing this method directly, this study tries to estimate the proper gas price and its effects on people‟s route choice behavior and compare gas consumption information to congestion pricing scheme. The results from a small network showed that providing this information can improve people‟s behavior in terms of route choice. Keywords- Congestion pricing, Gasoline consumption, Route change.

Suggested Citation

  • Rouhani, Omid M., 2010. "Gas Consumption Information: A Substitute for Congestion Pricing?," 51st Annual Transportation Research Forum, Arlington, Virginia, March 11-13, 2010 207246, Transportation Research Forum.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207246
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207246/files/2010_30_Gas_Consumption_Substitute_Congestion_Pricing.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207246?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rouwendal, Jan & Verhoef, Erik T., 2006. "Basic economic principles of road pricing: From theory to applications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 106-114, March.
    2. Eliasson, Jonas, 2008. "Lessons from the Stockholm congestion charging trial," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 395-404, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. Rouhani, Omid, 2015. "Revenue Risk Mitigation Options for Toll Roads," MPRA Paper 67662, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Rouhani, Omid M., 2013. "Queue Dissipation Shockwave Speed– A Signalized Intersection Case Study," 54th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Annapolis, Maryland, March 21-23, 2013 206954, Transportation Research Forum.
    3. Omid, M. Rouhani, 2013. "Queue Dissipation Shockwave Speed for Signalized Intersections," MPRA Paper 53161, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. M Rouhani, Omid, 2016. "Social welfare analysis of HOV to HOT conversion," MPRA Paper 75816, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. M. Rouhani, Omid, 2014. "Road pricing: An overview," MPRA Paper 59662, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Rouhani, Omid M. & Oliver Gao, H., 2014. "An advanced traveler general information system for Fresno, California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 254-267.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Vos, Jonas, 2016. "Road pricing in a polycentric urban region: Analysing a pilot project in Belgium," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 134-142.
    2. Jonas Westin, 2011. "Labor Market Effects of Road Pricing in a Population with Continuously Distributed Value of Time," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1458, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Qixiu Cheng & Zhiyuan Liu & Feifei Liu & Ruo Jia, 2017. "Urban dynamic congestion pricing: an overview and emerging research needs," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(0), pages 3-18, August.
    4. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron & Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Pigou pushes preferences: decarbonisation and endogenous values," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-16, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    5. Marco Percoco, 2010. "Urban Transport Policies And The Environment: Evidence From Italy," Articles, International Journal of Transport Economics, vol. 37(2).
    6. Hakim Hammadou & Claire Papaix, 2015. "Policy packages for modal shift and CO2 reduction in Lille, France," Working Papers 1501, Chaire Economie du climat.
    7. Eliasson, Jonas, 2016. "Is congestion pricing fair? Consumer and citizen perspectives on equity effects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-15.
    8. Dogterom, Nico & Ettema, Dick & Dijst, Martin, 2018. "Behavioural effects of a tradable driving credit scheme: Results of an online stated adaptation experiment in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 52-64.
    9. Vonk Noordegraaf, Diana & Annema, Jan Anne & van Wee, Bert, 2014. "Policy implementation lessons from six road pricing cases," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 172-191.
    10. Palma, André de & Lindsey, Robin & Proost, Stef, 2006. "Research challenges in modelling urban road pricing: An overview," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 97-105, March.
    11. Björn Hårsman & John M. Quigley, 2010. "Political and public acceptability of congestion pricing: Ideology and self-interest," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 854-874.
    12. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Yusuke Suzuki & Shuji Uranishi, 2017. "Magnitude of external costs of highways in Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 337-357, October.
    13. Anderstig, Christer & Berglund, Svante & Eliasson, Jonas & Andersson, Matts & Pyddoke, Roger, 2012. "Congestion charges and labour market imperfections: “Wider economic benefits” or “losses”?," Working papers in Transport Economics 2012:4, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    14. Eliasson, Jonas, 2017. "Congestion pricing," MPRA Paper 88224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Arlinghaus, Johanna Brigitte & Konc, Théo & Mattauch, Linus & Sommer, Stephan, 2024. "The effect of information framing on policy support: Experimental evidence from urban policies," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302449, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    16. De Borger, Bruno & Russo, Antonio, 2018. "The political economy of cordon tolls," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 133-148.
    17. Francke, Angela & Kaniok, Denise, 2013. "Responses to differentiated road pricing schemes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 25-30.
    18. Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Bascuñán, Raúl & Rizzi, Luis Ignacio & Salata, Andrés, 2021. "Assessing the potential acceptability of road pricing in Santiago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 153-169.
    19. Sun, Qipeng & Liu, Hang & Wang, Yongjie & Li, Qiong & Chen, Wenqiang & Bai, Pengxia & Xue, Chenlei, 2022. "Cooperation in the jaywalking dilemma of a road public good due to points guidance," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    20. Wang, Lanlan & Xu, Jintao & Qin, Ping, 2014. "Will a driving restriction policy reduce car trips?—The case study of Beijing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 279-290.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr10:207246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.