IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/fcnddp/16449.html

Nontraditional Crops And Land Accumulation Among Guatemalan Smallholders: Is The Impact Sustainable?

Author

Listed:
  • Carletto, Calogero

Abstract

Since the late 1970s dramatic economic changes have taken place in the agricultural sector in the highlands of Guatemala. The introduction of new export crops, such as snow peas, broccoli, and miniature vegetables, has led to yet another agro-export boom. Unlike earlier booms, however, this one has included all but the smallest farmers. The high rate of smallholder participation in the boom, and the initial high profitability of nontraditional exports (NTXs), fueled initial optimism that NTX production could increase smallholders’ ability to accumulate land and so decrease the highly skewed distribution of land in Guatemala, a country with one of the most unequal landholding patterns in all of Latin America. The picture that emerges from the analysis in this paper raises serious questions about the sustainability and equity effects of NTX crop adoption among smallholders in the long run. Two main findings illustrate the problems besetting NTX crop production. First, the land accumulation rates of adopters have dropped dramatically in the 1990s. NTX crop adopters accumulated close to three times more land than non-adopters in the 1980s. Although adopters are still accumulating more land than non-adopters in the 1990s, the gap between the two groups has narrowed substantially. Second, smaller adopters are no longer accumulating land at higher rates than their larger counterparts. In the 1980s the landholdings of smaller adopters grew significantly faster than those of the larger adopters, but this trend reversed itself in the 1990s. The advantages smallholders initially had in accumulating land may have been lost as a result of deteriorating agronomic conditions and volatile export markets. However, given adequate policy support, smallholders could indeed improve their socioeconomic position through cultivation of NTX crops and still prove to be viable economic agents in the country’s lucrative export market.

Suggested Citation

  • Carletto, Calogero, 2000. "Nontraditional Crops And Land Accumulation Among Guatemalan Smallholders: Is The Impact Sustainable?," FCND Discussion Papers 16449, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16449
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16449/files/fc000080.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.16449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maxwell, Simon & Fernando, Adrian, 1989. "Cash crops in developing countries: The issues, the facts, the policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 17(11), pages 1677-1708, November.
    2. Barham, Bradford & Carter, Michael R. & Sigelko, Wayne, 1995. "Agro-export production and peasant land access: Examining the dynamic between adoption and accumulation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 85-107, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carter, Michael R. & Barham, Bradford L., 1996. "Level playing fields and laissez faire: Postliberal development strategy in inegalitarian agrarian economies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(7), pages 1133-1149, July.
    2. Mahamadou Roufahi Tankari, 2017. "Cash crops reduce the welfare of farm households in Senegal," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(5), pages 1105-1115, October.
    3. Shively, Gerald E., 2001. "Poverty, consumption risk, and soil conservation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 267-290, August.
    4. Amrita Saha & Jody Harris & Nicholas Nisbett & John Thompson, 2024. "Agricultural commercialisation and food consumption: pathways and trade-offs across four African contexts," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 16(6), pages 1501-1528, December.
    5. Tschirley, David L. & Flores, Luis & Mather, David, 2010. "Agricultural and Food Security Policy Analysis in Central America: Assessing Local Institutional Capacity, Data Availability, and Outcomes," Food Security International Development Working Papers 90991, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    6. Xie, Hualin & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Xinmin, 2018. "Evolutionary game and simulation of management strategies of fallow cultivated land: A case study in Hunan province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 86-97.
    7. Yoshito Takasaki & BRADFORD L. BARHAM & Oliver T. Coomes, 2000. "Wealth Accumulation and Activity Choice Evolution Among Amazonian Forest Peasant Households," Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Papers 434, Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics Department.
    8. Leo M. Doerr & Wolfgang Maennig, 2025. "Globalization in the Food Sector and Poverty," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 37(5), pages 934-964, October.
    9. Lorena Lombardozzi, 2024. "Untangling the nexus between marketization, crop diversity, farmers' wealth and nutrition: The case of Uzbekistan," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 1489-1506, March.
    10. Matthys, Marie-Luise & Acharya, Sushant & Khatri, Sanjaya, 2021. "“Before cardamom, we used to face hardship”: Analyzing agricultural commercialization effects in Nepal through a local concept of the Good Life," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Ryan Edwards, 2015. "Is plantation agriculture good for the poor? Evidence from Indonesia's palm oil expansion," Departmental Working Papers 2015-12, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    12. Adhiguru, P. & Ramasamy, C., 2003. "Agricultural-based Interventions for Sustainable Nutritional Security," Policy Papers 344967, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    13. Barham, Bradford & Carter, Michael R. & Sigelko, Wayne, 1995. "Agro-export production and peasant land access: Examining the dynamic between adoption and accumulation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 85-107, February.
    14. Heckelei, T. & Amrouk, E.M. & Grosche, S., 2018. "International interdependence between cash crop and staple food futures price indices: A wavelet-BEKK-GARCH assessment," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277376, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Moradi, Alexander & Baten, Joerg, 2005. "Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa: New Data and New Insights from Anthropometric Estimates," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1233-1265, August.
    16. Daniele Guidi, 2011. "Sustainable Agriculture Enterprise: Framing Strategies to Support Smallholder Inclusive Value Chains for Rural Poverty Alleviation," CID Working Papers 53, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    17. Drabo, Alassane, 2017. "Climate change mitigation and agricultural development models: Primary commodity exports or local consumption production?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 110-125.
    18. Carletto, Calogero & de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 1996. "Knowledge, Toxicity, And External Shocks: The Determinants Of Adoption And Abandonment Of Non-Traditional Export Crops By Smallholders In Guatemala," CUDARE Working Papers 25088, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Alan Terry & Matthew Ryder, 2007. "Improving food security in Swaziland: The transition from subsistence to communally managed cash cropping," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(4), pages 263-272, November.
    20. Kostadis J. Papaioannou & Michiel de Haas, 2015. "Climate shocks, cash crops and resilience: Evidence from colonial tropical Africa," Working Papers 0076, Utrecht University, Centre for Global Economic History.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.