IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa166/276194.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Innovation for transition: is the EU R&I landscape supportive of the bioeconomy?

Author

Listed:
  • Henchion, Maeve
  • Devaney, Laura

Abstract

The bioeconomy presents an opportunity for a transition to a low carbon and circular economy and society, addressing global challenges such as population growth, climate change, biodiversity loss, resource scarcity and food security (Devaney and Henchion, 2018). While various countries and regions have developed national/regional bioeconomy strategies, alternative visions for the bioeconomy exist. These have different aims and objectives, spatial focus, prioritised sources of value creation, and drivers and mediators of innovation (Bugge et al., 2016). However regardless of the vision for the future bioeconomy, research and innovation forms a core element of any resultant strategy. This paper reviews some of the research and innovation (R&I) policy frameworks at European Union (EU) level in relation to the bioeconomy (Devaney and Henchion, 2017). It draws on innovation systems literature (e.g. Coenen et al., 2015) to critically assess the extent to which such policy addresses structural innovation system failures. However in keeping with a view that the development of the bioeconomy involves transformative change and thus demands more from innovation policy than merely correcting structural innovation system failures (Weber and Rohracher, 2012), it also applies a transformational systems analytical framework to EU R&I policy. Results have application for policy makers and other stakeholders in regions/countries seeking to develop a national bioeconomy strategy, and/or to critically reflect on its R&I policy to ensure it supports the achievement of transformative change.

Suggested Citation

  • Henchion, Maeve & Devaney, Laura, 2018. "Innovation for transition: is the EU R&I landscape supportive of the bioeconomy?," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276194, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa166:276194
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276194/files/Innovation%20for%20transition%3A%20is%20the%20EU%20R%26I%20landscape%20supportive%20of%20the%20bioeconomy%3F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Devaney & Maeve Henchion & Áine Regan, 2017. "Good Governance in the Bioeconomy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(2), pages 41-46, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oguntuase Oluwaseun James, 2020. "Bioeconomy for Sustainable Development in Africa – State of Production Determinants and Future Directions," Economic and Regional Studies / Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Sebastian Hinderer & Leif Brändle & Andreas Kuckertz, 2021. "Transition to a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia & Jiménez-Caballero, Paula & Zarauz, Irene, 2022. "Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Arkadiusz Piwowar & Joanna Harasym, 2020. "The Importance and Prospects of the Use of Algae in Agribusiness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Davide Viaggi, 2018. "Quantifying the Impact of Scientific Research on Agriculture," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 17(1), pages 19-24, April.
    6. Stefan Bößner & Francis X. Johnson & Zoha Shawoo, 2020. "Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Carmen Priefer & Rolf Meyer, 2019. "One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Jonas Van Lancker & Erwin Wauters & Guido Van Huylenbroeck, 2019. "Open Innovation In Public Research Institutes — Success And Influencing Factors," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(07), pages 1-37, October.
    9. Urmetzer, Sophie & Lask, Jan & Vargas-Carpintero, Ricardo & Pyka, Andreas, 2020. "Learning to change: Transformative knowledge for building a sustainable bioeconomy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa166:276194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.