IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea91/271171.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparison Of Simulation And Analytical Methods: A Case Study Of The Effects Of Decoupling On The U.S. Rice Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Willett, Lois Schertz
  • Watanabe, Satoko

Abstract

The specification of a dynamic national rice industry model is presented. Model coefficients using two stage least squares and model validation statistics are presented. Short run and long run elasticities are compared with other studies. Simulation and analytical methods, for testing convergence and evaluating long run values, are compared. Differences, and their implications, with regard to the effects of decoupling policies are analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Willett, Lois Schertz & Watanabe, Satoko, 1991. "A Comparison Of Simulation And Analytical Methods: A Case Study Of The Effects Of Decoupling On The U.S. Rice Industry," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271171, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea91:271171
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.271171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271171/files/aaea-1991-036.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/271171/files/aaea-1991-036.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.271171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. B. Wade Brorsen & Jean-Paul Chavas & Warren R. Grant, 1987. "A Market Equilibrium Analysis of the Impact of Risk on the U.S. Rice Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(4), pages 733-739.
    2. Kost, William E., 1980. "Model Validation And The Net Trade Model," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 32(02), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Shlomo Reutlinger, 1966. "Analysis of a Dynamic Model, with Particular Emphasis on Long-Run Projections," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 48(1), pages 88-106.
    4. J. P. Houck & M. E. Ryan, 1972. "Supply Analysis for Corn in the United States: The Impact of Changing Government Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 184-191.
    5. Childs, Nathan W. & Lin, William, 1989. "Rice: Background for 1990 Farm Legislation," Staff Reports 278848, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Houck, James P. & Ryan, Mary E., 1972. "Supply Analysis For Corn In The United States: The Impact Of Changing Government Programs," Staff Papers 13554, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grant, Warren R. & Beach, John & Lin, William, 1984. "Factors Affecting Supply, Demand, And Prices Of U.S. Rice," Staff Reports 277629, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Holt, Matthew T., 1989. "Risk, Rational Expectations, and Price Stabilization in the U.S. Corn Market," Staff Papers 200480, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    3. Jeon, Jong-Pyeong, 1989. "The impacts of policy alternatives and foreign demand fluctuations on the US rice market," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010204, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Chen, Dean T. & Ito, Shoichi, 1989. "Modeling Supply Response for Rice Program Analysis: An Application of Implicit Revenue Switching Functions," Staff Reports 257924, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    5. Gadson, Kenneth E. & Price, J. Michael & Salathe, Larry E., 1982. "Food And Agricultural Policy Simulator (Fapsim): Structural Equations And Variable Definitions," Staff Reports 276743, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Chen, Dean T. & Penson, John B. & Teboh, Jacob F., 1988. "The Implicit Revenue Function Approach to Farm Program Analysis," Staff Reports 257912, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    7. Schoney, R. A., 1990. "An Analysis of Wheat Supply Response Under Risk and Uncertainty," Working Papers 244030, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    8. A. Farhad Chowdhury, 2002. "The impact of the acreage allotment program on rice farming," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 8(1), pages 49-57, February.
    9. Chembezi, Duncan M. & Womack, Abner W., 1992. "Regional Acreage Response For U.S. Corn And Wheat: The Effects Of Government Programs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Womack, Abner W., 1985. "Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Investigation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Haile, M.G. & Kalkuhl, M., 2014. "Volatility in the international food markets: implications for global agricultural supply and for market and price policy," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    12. Kanlaya J. Barr & Bruce A. Babcock & Miguel A. Carriquiry & Andre M. Nassar & Leila Harfuch, 2011. "Agricultural Land Elasticities in the United States and Brazil," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 449-462.
    13. Just, Richard E., 1992. "Discovering Microeconomic Relationships in Agriculture," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    14. Umanath Malaiarasan & R. Paramasivam & K. Thomas Felix & S. J. Balaji, 2020. "Simultaneous equation model for Indian sugar sector," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(1), pages 113-141, June.
    15. Evans, R. Samuel & Kenyon, David E., 1974. "Regional Soybean Acreage Response Analysis and Projections for 1974," Miscellaneous Publications 327162, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Soule, Meredith J. & Nimon, R. Wesley & Mullarkey, Daniel J., 2001. "Risk Management And The Environment: Impacts At The Intensive And Extensive Margins," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20670, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Wu, JunJie & Adams, Richard M., 2002. "Micro Versus Macro Acreage Response Models: Does Site-Specific Information Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(01), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Rausser, Gordon C. & Lichtenberg, Erik & Lattimore, Ralph, 1981. "Developments in theory and empirical applications of endogenous governmental behavior," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt34j553k1, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    19. Danin, Yigal, 1976. "A Simple Analysis Of Acreage Response To Some Agricultural Programs," Staff Papers 13889, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Weaver, Robert D. & Krainik, Amy, 1979. "Policy Control of Corn Acreage: A Re-examination," Staff Paper Series 256837, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea91:271171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.