IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/360753.html

The Role of the Courts in Environmental Property Rights Disputes: An Empirical Analysis of U.S. Army Corps of Enigneer Dams

Author

Listed:
  • Ottenheimer, William
  • Brady, Michael
  • Yoder, Jonathan
  • Rajagopalan, Kirti

Abstract

Federally managed dams are designated specific purposes in the legislation associated with their construction. Dams constructed and managed by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers are typically focused on transportation and flood control, although they can have multiple other purposes including water supply for agriculture, hydroelectric power generation, and recreation. These purposes are often competing and some of them were added post construction. The competition of mutually exclusive resource allocation endeavors creates conflicts which can escalate to claims against the federal government. This research assesses the development of federally managed water resource conflicts over the past 80 years through legal proceedings. A hazard regression and count data model regression test a hypothesis that an increase in the number of objectives managed for increases litigation risk for water management agencies. This research informs an implication of multi-objective environmental management in a time of increasing responsiveness to special interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Ottenheimer, William & Brady, Michael & Yoder, Jonathan & Rajagopalan, Kirti, 2025. "The Role of the Courts in Environmental Property Rights Disputes: An Empirical Analysis of U.S. Army Corps of Enigneer Dams," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 360753, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360753
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.360753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/360753/files/75193_103740_105300_complete_aaea_2025_manu_ottenheimer.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.360753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grossman, Sanford J & Hart, Oliver D, 1986. "The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(4), pages 691-719, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benito Arruñada & Manuel González, 1997. "How competition controls team production: The case of fishing firms," Economics Working Papers 261, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    2. Elhanan Helpman, 2014. "Foreign Trade and Investment: Firm-level Perspectives," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(321), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Miguel Espinosa, 2021. "Labor Boundaries and Skills: The Case of Lobbyists," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1586-1607, March.
    4. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2019. "Incomplete contracts, limited liability, and the optimality of joint ownership," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Corrado Ievoli & Angelo Belliggiano & Danilo Marandola & Giuseppe Pistacchio & Luca Romagnoli, 2019. "Network Contracts in the Italian agri-food industry: Determinants and spatial patterns," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(2), pages 275-306.
    6. Rolf Bühner & Jörg Digmayer, 2003. "Aktienmarktreaktionen auf die Ankündigungen von Spin-offs und Sell-offs," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 55(7), pages 657-677, November.
    7. Georg Nöldeke & Larry Samuelson, 2015. "Investment and Competitive Matching," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 835-896, May.
    8. Marvin Hanisch & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Carolin Haeussler & Shivaram V. Devarakonda, 2024. "Hybrid Administrative Interfaces: Authority Delegation and Reversion in Strategic Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 550-572, March.
    9. Wilhelm Kohler & Marcel Smolka, 2009. "Global Sourcing Decisions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Spain," CESifo Working Paper Series 2903, CESifo.
    10. Filippo Belloc, 2015. "Employee Representation Legislations and Innovation," Department of Economics University of Siena 719, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    11. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    12. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2005. "Sell the Plant? The Impact of Contract Manufacturing on Innovation, Capacity, and Profitability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 133-150, January.
    13. Hege, U. & Mella-Barral, P., 1999. "Collateral, Renegotiation and the Value of Diffusely Held Debt," Discussion Paper 1999-94, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. Scott Gehlbach & Konstantin Sonin & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2010. "Businessman Candidates," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 718-736, July.
    15. Brian S. Silverman & Paul Ingram, 2017. "Asset ownership and incentives in early shareholder capitalism: Liverpool shipping in the eighteenth century We are deeply indebted to historians Nick Radburn and especially Stephen Behrendt for extensive discussions of eighteenth-century transatlant," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(4), pages 854-875, April.
    16. Yingyi Qian & Barry R. Weingast, 1997. "Federalism as a Commitment to Reserving Market Incentives," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 83-92, Fall.
    17. Britta Butz & Pablo Guillen Alvarez & Christine Harbring, 2024. "Incentives for cooperation in groups: sociality meets decision rights," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 2925-2951, October.
    18. Ang, James & Yan, Zhenli & Xiao, Tusheng & Yuan, Chun & Wang, Jingfang, 2024. "Impact of Fintech on labor allocation efficiency in firms: Empirical evidence from China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    19. Arindrajit Dube & Ethan Kaplan, 2010. "Does Outsourcing Reduce Wages in the Low-Wage Service Occupations? Evidence from Janitors and Guards," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 63(2), pages 287-306, January.
    20. Dirk Höring & Helmut Gründl & Sebastian Schlütter, 2016. "Impediments to Communication in Financial Institutions: Implications for the Risk Management Organization," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, Springer;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 41(2), pages 193-224, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:360753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.