IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/364841.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effects of knowledge transfer channels on the adoption of post-harvest technologies in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Adeoti, J. O.
  • Adeyinka, F. M.
  • Bolaji, M.
  • Popoola, O. A.

Abstract

The adoption of postharvest technologies has been a major and persistent challenge for Nigeria’s agro-industry, while large postharvest losses remain daunting. In addressing this challenge, several research efforts have been employed to develop postharvest technologies (PHTs). This study assesses the role of knowledge transfer channels and their effects in fostering the adoption of PHTs by agro-allied firms. The approach to the study is largely qualitative and descriptive analysis using primary data collected from 19 public agricultural research institutes (ARIs), seven universities, and case studies of five agro-allied firms. The findings of the study demonstrate the existence of PHTs developed by Nigerian agricultural research institutions (ARIs and universities) and few cases of agro-allied firms that have successfully adopted these PHTs in their operations. Cost of PHTs and simplicity of PHTs are seen by agricultural research institutions as the most important factors affecting the adoption of PHTs, while high cost of PHTs are perceived by agro-allied firms as the most important factor retarding the adoption of PHTs. The findings also confirm that though intellectual property right is important for knowledge generated by agricultural research institutions, channels of knowledge transfer that makes PHTs readily available to agro-allied firms provide open access that should be explored and encouraged to foster diffusion of PHTs among agro-allied firms in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeoti, J. O. & Adeyinka, F. M. & Bolaji, M. & Popoola, O. A., 2023. "Effects of knowledge transfer channels on the adoption of post-harvest technologies in Nigeria," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364841, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364841
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364841/files/348.%20Post%20harvest%20in%20Nigeria.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    2. Rudi Bekkers & Bodas Freitas, 2008. "Analysing preferences for knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01487467, HAL.
    3. Bekkers, Rudi & Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria, 2008. "Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1837-1853, December.
    4. World Bank, 2011. "Missing Food : The Case of Postharvest Grain Losses in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Bank Publications - Reports 2824, The World Bank Group.
    5. Quimba, Francis Mark A. & Rosellon, Maureen Ane D., 2019. "Impact of Government Incentive on MSME Innovation," Discussion Papers DP 2019-27, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    6. Anshul Pachouri & Sankalp Sharma, 2016. "Barriers to Innovation in Indian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," ADBI Working Papers 588, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Bellucci & L. Pennacchio, 2016. "University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 730-752, August.
    2. Taran Thune & Magnus Gulbrandsen, 2014. "Dynamics of collaboration in university–industry partnerships: do initial conditions explain development patterns?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 977-993, December.
    3. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, 2021. "Drivers of academic engagement in public-private research collaboration: an empirical study," Papers 2103.14859, arXiv.org.
    4. Negin Salimi & Jafar Rezaei, 2016. "Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1911-1938, December.
    5. Stilyana V. Mikova & Lilyana K. Mihova & Miroslav G. Stefanov, 2020. "Interaction Between Higher Education Institutions And Business Organisations In The Field Of Logistics And Supply Chain Management," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 14(1), pages 116-129.
    6. Alessandra Scandura & Simona Iammarino, 2022. "Academic engagement with industry: the role of research quality and experience," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1000-1036, August.
    7. Roberto Iorio & Sandrine Labory & Francesco Rentocchini, 2014. "Academics’ Motivations and Depth and Breadth of Knowledge Transfer Activities," Working Papers 1401, c.MET-05 - Centro Interuniversitario di Economia Applicata alle Politiche per L'industria, lo Sviluppo locale e l'Internazionalizzazione.
    8. Zhiyan Zhao & Anders Broström & Jianfeng Cai, 2020. "Promoting academic engagement: university context and individual characteristics," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 304-337, February.
    9. Bastien Bernela & Rachel Levy, 2017. "Collaboration networks within a French cluster: Do partners really interact with each other?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(1), pages 115-138, March.
    10. Matthias Huegel & Philip Doerr & Martin Kalthaus, 2025. "Initiation of knowledge and technology transfer from academia to industry: opportunity recognition and transfer channel choice," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 34(1), pages 171-209.
    11. Andrew J. Nelson, 2016. "How to Share “A Really Good Secret”: Managing Sharing/Secrecy Tensions Around Scientific Knowledge Disclosure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 265-285, April.
    12. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Aldo Geuna & Federica Rossi, 2012. "The governance of formal university-industry interactions: Understanding the rationales for alternative models," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01487508, HAL.
    13. Giovanni Abramo & Francesca Apponi & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, 2021. "Do the propensity and drivers of academics' engagement in research collaboration with industry vary over time?," Papers 2102.05364, arXiv.org.
    14. Perkmann, Markus & Tartari, Valentina & McKelvey, Maureen & Autio, Erkko & Broström, Anders & D’Este, Pablo & Fini, Riccardo & Geuna, Aldo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Hughes, Alan & Krabel, Stefan & Kitson, Mi, 2013. "Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 423-442.
    15. Aurora A. C. Teixeira & Luisa Mota, 2012. "A bibliometric portrait of the evolution, scientific roots and influence of the literature on university–industry links," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 93(3), pages 719-743, December.
    16. Freel, Mark & Persaud, Ajax & Chamberlin, Tyler, 2019. "Faculty ideals and universities' third mission," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 10-21.
    17. Gloria Naranjo-Africano & Jaider Vega-Jurado & Liney Manjarres-Henríquez, 2023. "Barriers to Third Mission: organizational and individual antecedents," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    18. Diekhoff, Josefine & Krieger, Bastian & Licht, Georg & Rammer, Christian, 2019. "Stand der Messung von Interaktionen zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft im internationalen Vergleich," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 248650.
    19. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    20. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Alessandro Nuvolari, 2012. "Traditional Versus Heterodox Motives for Academic Patenting: Evidence from the Netherlands," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(8), pages 671-695, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.