IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae23/364841.html

Effects of knowledge transfer channels on the adoption of post-harvest technologies in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Adeoti, J. O.
  • Adeyinka, F. M.
  • Bolaji, M.
  • Popoola, O. A.

Abstract

The adoption of postharvest technologies has been a major and persistent challenge for Nigeria’s agro-industry, while large postharvest losses remain daunting. In addressing this challenge, several research efforts have been employed to develop postharvest technologies (PHTs). This study assesses the role of knowledge transfer channels and their effects in fostering the adoption of PHTs by agro-allied firms. The approach to the study is largely qualitative and descriptive analysis using primary data collected from 19 public agricultural research institutes (ARIs), seven universities, and case studies of five agro-allied firms. The findings of the study demonstrate the existence of PHTs developed by Nigerian agricultural research institutions (ARIs and universities) and few cases of agro-allied firms that have successfully adopted these PHTs in their operations. Cost of PHTs and simplicity of PHTs are seen by agricultural research institutions as the most important factors affecting the adoption of PHTs, while high cost of PHTs are perceived by agro-allied firms as the most important factor retarding the adoption of PHTs. The findings also confirm that though intellectual property right is important for knowledge generated by agricultural research institutions, channels of knowledge transfer that makes PHTs readily available to agro-allied firms provide open access that should be explored and encouraged to foster diffusion of PHTs among agro-allied firms in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeoti, J. O. & Adeyinka, F. M. & Bolaji, M. & Popoola, O. A., 2023. "Effects of knowledge transfer channels on the adoption of post-harvest technologies in Nigeria," 2023 Seventh AAAE/60th AEASA Conference, September 18-21, 2023, Durban, South Africa 364841, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364841
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.364841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/364841/files/348.%20Post%20harvest%20in%20Nigeria.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.364841?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quimba, Francis Mark A. & Rosellon, Maureen Ane D., 2019. "Impact of Government Incentive on MSME Innovation," Discussion Papers DP 2019-27, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    2. Rudi Bekkers & Bodas Freitas, 2008. "Analysing preferences for knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?," Post-Print hal-01487467, HAL.
    3. World Bank, 2011. "Missing Food : The Case of Postharvest Grain Losses in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Bank Publications - Reports 2824, The World Bank Group.
    4. Anshul Pachouri & Sankalp Sharma, 2016. "Barriers to Innovation in Indian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," ADBI Working Papers 588, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    5. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    6. Bekkers, Rudi & Bodas Freitas, Isabel Maria, 2008. "Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1837-1853, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Iorio & Sandrine Labory & Francesco Rentocchini, 2014. "Academics’ Motivations and Depth and Breadth of Knowledge Transfer Activities," Working Papers 1401, c.MET-05 - Centro Interuniversitario di Economia Applicata alle Politiche per L'industria, lo Sviluppo locale e l'Internazionalizzazione.
    2. Abramo, Giovanni & D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea & Di Costa, Flavia, 2021. "The scholarly impact of private sector research: A multivariate analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    3. Aaron Kaegi & Cornelia Storz & Tobias ten Brink & Na Zou, 2025. "Web mining science–industry linkages: extending typologies and rethinking knowledge transfer," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(12), pages 6909-6948, December.
    4. Fini, Riccardo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Meoli, Azzurra, 2020. "The effectiveness of university regulations to foster science-based entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).
    5. Marina van Geenhuizen, 2013. "From Ivory Tower to Living Lab: Accelerating the Use of University Knowledge," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 31(6), pages 1115-1132, December.
    6. Véronique Schaeffer & Sıla Öcalan-Özel & Julien Pénin, 2020. "The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–industry knowledge transfer: a longitudinal approach," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 31-55, February.
    7. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo & Flavia Di Costa, 2020. "The relative impact of private research on scientific advancement," Papers 2012.04908, arXiv.org.
    8. Lianne Foti & Lance Warwick & Eric Lyons & Sonia Dhaliwal & Michael Alcorn, 2023. "Knowledge Transfer and Innovation: Universities as Catalysts for Sustainable Decision Making in Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-11, July.
    9. Federica Rossi & Ainurul Rosli, 2013. "Indicators of university-industry knowledge transfer performance and their implications for universities: Evidence from the UK’s HE-BCI survey," Working Papers 13, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Aug 2013.
    10. Evers, Gerwin & Chappin, Maryse M.H., 2020. "Knowledge sharing in smart grid pilot projects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    11. Federica Rossi, 2014. "The efficiency of universities’ knowledge transfer activities: A multi-output approach beyond patenting and licensing," Working Papers 16, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Feb 2014.
    12. Chung, Jaemin & Ko, Namuk & Yoon, Janghyeok, 2021. "Inventor group identification approach for selecting university-industry collaboration partners," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    13. Nola Hewitt-Dundas, 2013. "The role of proximity in university-business cooperation for innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 93-115, April.
    14. Patrick S. W. Fong & Xuhua Chang & Qiang Chen, 2018. "Faculty patent assignment in the Chinese mainland: evidence from the top 35 patent application universities," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 69-95, February.
    15. Thomas Wolfgang Thurner, 2017. "TRANSFER REVENUES OF RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY ORGANIZATIONS (RTOs) IN TIMES OF ECONOMIC CRISIS," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 1-24, February.
    16. Gianluca Fabiano & Andrea Marcellusi & Giampiero Favato, 2020. "Public–private contribution to biopharmaceutical discoveries: a bibliometric analysis of biomedical research in UK," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 153-168, July.
    17. de Jong, Stefan P.L. & Wardenaar, Tjerk & Horlings, Edwin, 2016. "Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: A quantitative study of two climate research programmes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 1397-1409.
    18. Giovanni Abramo & Francesca Apponi & Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, 2021. "Public–private research collaborations: Longitudinal field‐level analysis of determinants, frequency, and impact," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 1405-1427, December.
    19. Isabel Maria Bodas Freitas & Aldo Geuna & Federica Rossi, 2012. "The governance of formal university-industry interactions: Understanding the rationales for alternative models," Post-Print hal-01487508, HAL.
    20. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2022. "Drivers of academic engagement in public–private research collaboration: an empirical study," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1861-1884, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae23:364841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.