IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/eschap/334028.html

Affective polarization and qualitative methods

In: Handbook of Affective Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Röllicke, Lena

Abstract

This chapter explores the potential of using qualitative methods to study affective polarization. While questions of how best to measure affective polarization are receiving increasing attention, qualitative approaches have remained largely absent from the literature. Drawing on existing qualitative studies on affective polarization, as well as examples of seminal qualitative work in the broader field of public opinion research, this chapter argues that qualitative approaches could contribute to the study of affective polarization in at least three ways: Firstly, qualitative methods could be used to refine quantitative measures of affective polarization, for instance by enhancing construct and ecological validity. Secondly, qualitative studies can explore and further elucidate the concept of affective polarization, offering in-depth accounts of the meaning and interrelations of different constituent components of affective polarization. Thirdly, qualitative approaches can broaden our perspective on affective polarization, generating insights into the wider phenomenon, adopting a context-sensitive account and taking a more critical, reflexive stance. The chapter concludes by discussing potential limitations and outlining some practical ways to leverage the potential of complementing quantitative work on affective polarization with qualitative approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Röllicke, Lena, 2025. "Affective polarization and qualitative methods," EconStor Open Access Book Chapters, in: Handbook of Affective Polarization, pages 88-102, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:eschap:334028
    DOI: 10.4337/9781035310609.00012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/334028/1/Full-text-chapter-Roellicke-Affective-polarization.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4337/9781035310609.00012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahoney, James & Goertz, Gary, 2006. "A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 227-249, July.
    2. Verónica Pérez Bentancur & Lucía Tiscornia, 2024. "Iteration in Mixed-Methods Research Designs Combining Experiments and Fieldwork 1, 2," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(2), pages 729-759, May.
    3. Sabrina J Mayer & Luana Russo, 2024. "What one is not: a new scale to measure Negative Party Identity in multiparty systems," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 2887-2906, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boehnke, Denise & Jehling, Mathias & Vogt, Joachim, 2023. "What hinders climate adaptation? Approaching barriers in municipal land use planning through participant observation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Alejandro Avenburg & John Gerring & Jason Seawright, 2023. "How do social scientists reach causal inferences? A study of reception," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 257-275, February.
    3. repec:ilo:ilowps:467072 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Nora Dörrenbächer & Ellen Mastenbroek, 2019. "Passing the buck? Analyzing the delegation of discretion after transposition of European Union law," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 70-85, March.
    5. Alessandra Galiè, 2013. "Governance of seed and food security through participatory plant breeding: Empirical evidence and gender analysis from Syria," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(1), pages 31-42, February.
    6. McMichael, Celia & Robinson, Priscilla, 2016. "Drivers of sustained hygiene behaviour change: A case study from mid-western Nepal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 28-36.
    7. Ingo Rohlfing, 2014. "Comparative Hypothesis Testing Via Process Tracing," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 43(4), pages 606-642, November.
    8. Barbara Vis, 2012. "The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 41(1), pages 168-198, February.
    9. Srobana Bhattacharya & Courtney Burns, 2019. "What’s War Got to Do with It? Post-conflict Effects on Gender Equality in South and Southeast Asia, 1975–2006," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 6(1), pages 55-81, April.
    10. Abel, Dennis & Lieth, Jonas & Jünger, Stefan, 2024. "Mapping the spatial turn in social science energy research. A computational literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Sanchez Salgado, Rosa, 2013. "From ‘talking the talk’ to ‘walking the walk’: Implementing the EU guidelines on employment through the European Social Fund," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 17, June.
    12. Acuff, Christopher, 2023. "More Money or More Problems? Assessing the Fiscal Impact of Consolidation in Macon-Bibb County, Georgia," SocArXiv as3pb, Center for Open Science.
    13. Tom Chevalier, 2019. "Pourquoi y a-t-il plus de jeunes au chômage en France qu’en Allemagne ? Économie politique d'une citoyenneté économique," Post-Print hal-03078459, HAL.
    14. D. J. H. Lintelo & T. Munslow & K. Pittore & R. Lakshman, 2020. "Correction to: Process Tracing the Policy Impact of ‘Indicators’," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(4), pages 1338-1338, September.
    15. repec:osf:socarx:as3pb_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Richard A. Nielsen, 2016. "Case Selection via Matching," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(3), pages 569-597, August.
    17. Eva Thomann & Martino Maggetti, 2020. "Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 49(2), pages 356-386, May.
    18. Anna Salonen & Harri Terho & Eva Böhm & Ari Virtanen & Risto Rajala, 2021. "Engaging a product-focused sales force in solution selling: interplay of individual- and organizational-level conditions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 139-163, January.
    19. Shaffer, Paul, 2013. "Ten Years of “Q-Squared”: Implications for Understanding and Explaining Poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 269-285.
    20. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N. & Saridakis, Charalampos, 2014. "Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1796-1805.
    21. Barry Cooper & Judith Glaesser, 2008. "How has Educational Expansion Changed the Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Achieving Professional, Managerial and Technical Class Positions in Britain? A Configurational Analysis," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(3), pages 29-47, May.
    22. Ryan Wong & Jeroen van der Heijden, 2022. "How does symbolic commitment strengthen the resilience of sustainability institutions? Exploring the role of bureaucrats in Germany, Finland, and the UK," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 10-22, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:eschap:334028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.