IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/as3pb.html

More Money or More Problems? Assessing the Fiscal Impact of Consolidation in Macon-Bibb County, Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • Acuff, Christopher

Abstract

Attempts to create consolidated city-county governments have persisted in recent decades, with many local government reformers touting this type of organizational change as a solution to a number of challenges in metropolitan areas. Overall, research in this area has generally shown no conclusive outcomes related to achieving greater efficiencies as measured by a reduction in expenditures. However, the 2014 consolidation of Macon-Bibb County, Georgia presents an opportunity to explore a substantively important case due to a mandated twenty percent reduction in expenditures over a five-year period. This analysis finds that while officials generally met their goal of reducing budgeted expenditures, an analysis of actual expenditures and questions pertaining to longer-term outcomes, including reductions in staffing, performance, and credit ratings may be a cautionary tale for similar efforts in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Acuff, Christopher, 2023. "More Money or More Problems? Assessing the Fiscal Impact of Consolidation in Macon-Bibb County, Georgia," SocArXiv as3pb, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:as3pb
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/as3pb
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65416703282745198eb86544/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/as3pb?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahoney, James & Goertz, Gary, 2006. "A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 227-249, July.
    2. Takeshi Miyazaki, 2018. "Examining the relationship between municipal consolidation and cost reduction: an instrumental variable approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(10), pages 1108-1121, February.
    3. repec:cup:apsrev:v:55:y:1961:i:04:p:831-842_12 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Richard M. Walker & George A. Boyne, 2006. "Public management reform and organizational performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government's public service improvement strategy," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 371-393.
    5. Blom-Hansen, Jens & Houlberg, Kurt & Serritzlew, Søren & Treisman, Daniel, 2016. "Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 110(4), pages 812-831, November.
    6. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    7. repec:cup:apsrev:v:65:y:1971:i:03:p:682-693_13 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Joseph Drew & Brian Dollery & Michael A. Kortt, 2016. "Peas in a Pod: Are Efficient Municipalities also Financially Sustainable?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 122-131, June.
    9. Mintz, Mordekhay & Portnov, Boris A., 2023. "Social and environmental factors affecting the amount of property taxes collected by local authorities in Israel," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:as3pb_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Juan Luis Gómez‐Reino & Santiago Lago‐Peñas & Jorge Martinez‐Vazquez, 2023. "Evidence on economies of scale in local public service provision: A meta‐analysis," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(4), pages 793-819, September.
    3. Hirota, Haruaki & Iwata, Kazuyuki & Tanaka, Kenta, 2022. "Is public official training effective at reducing costs? Evidence from survey data on Japanese municipal mergers," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 145-158.
    4. Tavares Antonio F., 2018. "Municipal amalgamations and their effects: a literature review," Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development, Paradigm, vol. 22(1), pages 5-15, March.
    5. Skarbek, David, 2016. "Covenants without the Sword? Comparing Prison Self-Governance Globally," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 110(4), pages 845-862, November.
    6. John William Hatfield & Katrina Kosec & Luke P. Rodgers, 2024. "Housing values and jurisdictional fragmentation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 83-122, October.
    7. Kendall D. Funk & Erica Owen, 2020. "Consequences of an Anti‐Corruption Experiment for Local Government Performance in Brazil," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 444-468, March.
    8. Pengju Zhang, 2023. "The fiscal and economic impacts of municipal dissolution: evidence from New York," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(4), pages 948-1001, August.
    9. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2026. "Fiscal Decentralization at Fifty: Achievements and Challenges," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 256(1), pages 41-68, March.
    10. Blesse, Sebastian & Heinemann, Friedrich, 2020. "Citizens’ trade-offs in state merger decisions: Evidence from a randomized survey experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 438-471.
    11. Harjunen, Oskari & Saarimaa, Tuukka & Tukiainen, Janne, 2021. "Political representation and effects of municipal mergers," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 72-88, January.
    12. Andrew Simon, 2026. "Costly centralization: evidence from community college expansions," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 33(2), pages 548-589, April.
    13. Jia, Junxue & Liang, Xuan & Ma, Guangrong, 2021. "Political hierarchy and regional economic development: Evidence from a spatial discontinuity in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Mehr-un-Nisa & Qamar-un-Nisa & Samina Khalil, 2025. "Impact of Fiscal Decentralization in Improving Public Services Delivery across Developed and Developing Districts of Punjab, Pakistan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 9338-9364, June.
    15. Alessandro Sovera, 2025. "When Integration Backfires: Examining the Effects of Mandatory Inter-Municipal Cooperation on Local Housing Markets," Working Papers 40, Finnish Centre of Excellence in Tax Systems Research.
    16. repec:hal:journl:hal-03380333 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Clémence Tricaud, 2019. "Better alone? Evidence on the costs of intermunicipal cooperation," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2019-12-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.
    18. Gerard Turley & John McDonagh & Stephen McNena & Arkadiusz Grzedzinski, 2018. "Optimum Territorial Reforms in Local Government: An Empirical Analysis of Scale Economies in Ireland," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 49(4), pages 463-488.
    19. Sisi Yin & Zuyi Shen & Yunshu Gao, 2024. "The impact of city-county merger on firm-level total factor productivity—Evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Lapointe, Simon, 2018. "“Love thy neighbour”? The effect of income and language differences on votes for municipal secessions," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 229-245.
    21. Blesse Sebastian & Rösel Felix, 2017. "Was bringen kommunale Gebietsreformen?: Kausale Evidenz zu Hoffnungen, Risiken und alternativen Instrumenten," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 18(4), pages 307-324, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:as3pb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.