IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/crc/chapte/1-03.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

From public ownership back to commons. Lessons learnt from the Romanian experience in the forest sector

In: Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action

Author

Listed:
  • Ancu?a VAME?U

    (Solidarity Laboratory, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristina BARNA

    (Solidarity Laboratory, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irina OPINCARU

    (Civil Society Development Foundation, Institute of Social Economy, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This chapter is an analysis of the forest commons in Romania (in Romanian - „ob?te”,„composesorat”) as social solidarity economy organisations mainly looking at how the collective production of norms in these new (re-instituted after 50 years) organisations impacts the sustainability concerns in the collective management of natural goods and production of new goods and services of interest to the community. The chapter has four parts: the first part is offering to the readers a conceptual framework of common goods in order to better understand the particular situation of Romanian natural resources (forests, pastures) as common goods and their transition from public management to commons across time; the second part is a brief history of commons in Romania covering evolutions from 1948 to 2012 and including estimates of the size of surfaces they manage; the third part studies the commons as social economy organisations using key social and economic indicators of commons as SSE organisations from the Prometeus research project in which the authors were involved; and the last part assesses the disposition of the commons for a public, community interest mission and sustainable management of forests using survey data analysis. The chapter thus provides an in-depth analysis of commons as social solidarity economy organisations in Romania and of their capacity to provide a viable framework for sustainably managing the common resources under circumstances of significant economic pressure.

Suggested Citation

  • Ancu?a VAME?U & Cristina BARNA & Irina OPINCARU, 2018. "From public ownership back to commons. Lessons learnt from the Romanian experience in the forest sector," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 3, pages 55-74, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
  • Handle: RePEc:crc:chapte:1-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ciriec.uliege.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CSS1CHAP3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Louis Louis Laville & Dennis Young & Philippe Eynaud, 2015. "Civil Society, the Third Sector and Social Enterprise : Governance and Democracy," Post-Print halshs-02064779, HAL.
    2. Marthe Nyssens & Francesca Petrella, 2015. "Solidarity and Social Economy and Ostrom’s approach of common pool resources: through a better understanding of institutional diversity ? [ESS et ressources communes : vers la reconnaissance d’une ," Post-Print halshs-01447073, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gheorghe Roșculeț & Daniela Sorea, 2021. "Commons as Traditional Means of Sustainably Managing Forests and Pastures in Olt Land (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Daniela Sorea & Gheorghe Roșculeț & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Compossessorates in the Olt Land (Romania) as Sustainable Commons," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Sorea & Gheorghe Roșculeț & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Compossessorates in the Olt Land (Romania) as Sustainable Commons," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    3. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Anaïs PÉRILLEUX & Marthe NYSSENS, 2017. "Understanding Cooperative Finance As A New Common," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 155-177, June.
    4. Irina‐Sînziana Opincaru, 2021. "Elements of the institutionalization process of the forest and pasture commons in Romania as particular forms of social economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 101-118, March.
    5. Gheorghe Roșculeț & Daniela Sorea, 2021. "Commons as Traditional Means of Sustainably Managing Forests and Pastures in Olt Land (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Philippe Bance & Jérôme Schoenmaeckers, 2021. "The increasing role and the diversity forms of Commons for production and preservation of essential goods and services," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 5-12, March.
    7. Katrin Martens & Sebastian Rogga & Jana Zscheischler & Bernd Pölling & Andreas Obersteg & Annette Piorr, 2022. "Classifying New Hybrid Cooperation Models for Short Food-Supply Chains—Providing a Concept for Assessing Sustainability Transformation in the Urban-Rural Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Sara Calvo & Stephen Syrett & Andres Morales, 2020. "The political institutionalization of the social economy in Ecuador: Indigeneity and institutional logics," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(2), pages 269-289, March.
    9. Mara Willemijn van Twuijver & Lucas Olmedo & Mary O’Shaughnessy & Thia Hennessy, 2020. "Rural social enterprises in Europe: A systematic literature review," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(2), pages 121-142, March.
    10. Julien Kleszczowski, 2016. "La place des parties prenantes dans l’évaluation de l’impact social des organisations non lucratives: étude empirique au sein d’une organisation française," Post-Print hal-01901230, HAL.
    11. Jean-Robert Alcaras & Patrick Gianfaldoni & Lucile Manoury, 2017. "Les évolutions contrastées de l'ESS, entre économie alternative et entrepreneuriat social," Post-Print hal-03555825, HAL.
    12. Guillaume Plaisance, 2023. "Governing a union's external stakeholders: A prioritization method based on relationship quality and perceived impact," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(1), pages 75-108, March.
    13. Nicole Bolleyer, 2021. "Civil society – Politically engaged or member-serving? A governance perspective," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 495-520, September.
    14. Hudcová Eliška & Chovanec Tomáš & Moudrý Jan, 2018. "Social Entrepreneurship in Agriculture, a Sustainable Practice for Social and Economic Cohesion in Rural Areas: The Case of the Czech Republic," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(3), pages 377-397, September.
    15. Adrien Laurent & Pierre Garaudel & Géraldine Schmidt & Philippe Eynaud, 2019. "Civil Society Meta-organizations and Legitimating Processes: the Case of the Addiction Field in France," Post-Print halshs-02020886, HAL.
    16. Adanella Rossi & Mario Coscarello & Davide Biolghini, 2021. "(Re)Commoning Food and Food Systems. The Contribution of Social Innovation from Solidarity Economy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social economy; social solidarity economy organisation; commons; forestry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • L31 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Nonprofit Institutions; NGOs; Social Entrepreneurship
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crc:chapte:1-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CIRIEC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciulgbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.