IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i14p8012-d596475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Commons as Traditional Means of Sustainably Managing Forests and Pastures in Olt Land (Romania)

Author

Listed:
  • Gheorghe Roșculeț

    (Department of Social and Communication Sciences, Transilvania University of Brașov, 29, Eroilor Bd, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

  • Daniela Sorea

    (Department of Social and Communication Sciences, Transilvania University of Brașov, 29, Eroilor Bd, 500036 Brașov, Romania)

Abstract

The compossessorates in Transylvania (Romania) are traditional varieties of commons. During the inter-war period two types of compossessorates were most common in the Olt Land, between the Olt River and the Southern Carpathians: those of the former boyars and the ones owned by the former serfs. An analysis of the 1904 Austro-Hungarian Regulation on the organization and management of the commons, of the 1910 Romanian Forest Code that was implemented in Transylvania after 1918, and of the by-laws of compossessorates, derived from the aforementioned documents, unveils the concern of both legislators and members of compossessorates for the preservation, balanced exploitation and regeneration of the forest fund and their focus on sustainable management of forests. The compossessorates were disbanded upon the instauration of the communist regime in Romania and re-established after 1989. Nowadays, compossessorates in the Olt Land continue the local tradition of sustainably managing the forests and the pastures. Their activity in this regard can be improved. Collaboration of the communal schools and the university with the compossessorates, the use of the Internet to promote their image and the involvement of NGOs in their support would be effective in this respect.

Suggested Citation

  • Gheorghe Roșculeț & Daniela Sorea, 2021. "Commons as Traditional Means of Sustainably Managing Forests and Pastures in Olt Land (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8012-:d:596475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8012/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/8012/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irina‐Sînziana Opincaru, 2021. "Elements of the institutionalization process of the forest and pasture commons in Romania as particular forms of social economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 101-118, March.
    2. Monica Vasile, 2019. "The Enlivenment of institutions: emotional work and the emergence of contemporary land commons in the Carpathian Mountains," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(1), pages 124-150, January.
    3. Philippe Bance & Malika Ahmed Zaïd-Chertouk & Juan Fernando Álvarez & Cristina Barna & Pierre Bauby & Manuel Belo Moreira & Jean-Claude Boual & Monique Combes-Joret & Pascal Glemain & Miguel Gordo & A, 2018. "Providing Public Goods and Commons. Towards Coproduction and New Forms of Governance for a Revival of Public Action [Offrir des biens publics et des communs. Vers la coproduction et de nouvelles fo," Post-Print halshs-01964961, HAL.
    4. Philippe BANCE (ed.), 2018. "Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action," CIRIEC Studies Series, CIRIEC - Université de Liège, volume 1, number css1.
    5. Alexandrine LAPOUTTE, 2018. "Multi-stakeholder governance of the commons, a pragmatic approach," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 12, pages 251-264, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    6. Jean-Louis Louis Laville & Dennis Young & Philippe Eynaud, 2015. "Civil Society, the Third Sector and Social Enterprise : Governance and Democracy," Post-Print halshs-02064779, HAL.
    7. Ancu?a VAME?U & Cristina BARNA & Irina OPINCARU, 2018. "From public ownership back to commons. Lessons learnt from the Romanian experience in the forest sector," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 3, pages 55-74, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    8. Marthe Nyssens & Francesca Petrella, 2015. "Solidarity and Social Economy and Ostrom’s approach of common pool resources: through a better understanding of institutional diversity ? [ESS et ressources communes : vers la reconnaissance d’une ," Post-Print halshs-01447073, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniela Sorea & Monica Defta & Ionuț Mihai Popescu, 2023. "Journeys to Significant Places in Orthodoxy as a Source of Sustainable Local Development in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Daniela Sorea & Gheorghe Roșculeț & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Compossessorates in the Olt Land (Romania) as Sustainable Commons," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Daniela Sorea & Codrina Csesznek & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Culture-Centered Development Potential of Communities in Făgăraș Land (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Sorea & Gheorghe Roșculeț & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Compossessorates in the Olt Land (Romania) as Sustainable Commons," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Irina‐Sînziana Opincaru, 2021. "Elements of the institutionalization process of the forest and pasture commons in Romania as particular forms of social economy," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 101-118, March.
    3. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    4. MAREK HUDON & BENJAMIN HUYBRECHTS & Anaïs PÉRILLEUX & Marthe NYSSENS, 2017. "Understanding Cooperative Finance As A New Common," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 155-177, June.
    5. Alexandrine Lapoutte, 2021. "Résilience d'une méta‐organisation : Le cas d'un commun de l'alimentation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 79-100, March.
    6. Andrea Salustri, 2021. "Social and solidarity economy and social and solidarity commons: Towards the (re)discovery of an ethic of the common good?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 13-32, March.
    7. Ancu?a VAME?U & Cristina BARNA & Irina OPINCARU, 2018. "From public ownership back to commons. Lessons learnt from the Romanian experience in the forest sector," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & CIRIEC (ed.), Providing public goods and commons. Towards coproduction and new forms of governance for a revival of public action, volume 1, chapter 3, pages 55-74, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    8. Pierre BAUBY, 2022. "After the Keynesian paradigm and the paradigm of economic liberalism, a new paradigm based on "values"?," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 8, pages 167-180, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    9. Benjamin FRAGNY & Cathy ZADRA-VEIL, 2022. "Collective innovation and living labs of real estate: an institutionalization of citizen participation?," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 2, pages 43-58, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    10. Andrea Salustri, 2020. "Ricerca spaziale e sviluppo regionale: quali relazioni?," Public Finance Research Papers 42, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    11. Andrea Salustri, 2019. "The UN 2030 Agenda and Social and Solidarity Economy: toward a structural change?," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 104-117, December.
    12. Alexandrine LAPOUTTE & Georges ALAKPA, 2022. "The resilience of public–social economy partnerships for food justice: a case study," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 3, pages 59-80, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    13. Dorothea GREILING & Melanie SCHINNERL, 2022. "Combating Child Poverty at the Local Government Level in Austria and Belgium," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 1, pages 19-41, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    14. Philippe Bance & Jérôme Schoenmaeckers, 2021. "The increasing role and the diversity forms of Commons for production and preservation of essential goods and services," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 5-12, March.
    15. Benjamin FRIEDLÄNDER & Christina SCHAEFER, 2022. "Co-production of Public Goods in Shrinking Rural Regions in Germany: Why Does Public Action Still Matter?," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 6, pages 125-142, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    16. Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING, 2022. "Conclusions and Directions for further Research," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 0, pages 259-274, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    17. Laurent FRAISSE, 2022. "Social and solidarity economy and the co-construction of a new field of local public policies in France," CIRIEC Studies Series, in: Philippe BANCE & Marie-J. BOUCHARD & Dorothea GREILING & CIRIEC (ed.), New perspectives in the co-production of public policies, public services and common goods, volume 3, chapter 10, pages 207-226, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    18. Daniela Sorea & Codrina Csesznek & Gabriela Georgeta Rățulea, 2022. "The Culture-Centered Development Potential of Communities in Făgăraș Land (Romania)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    19. Katrin Martens & Sebastian Rogga & Jana Zscheischler & Bernd Pölling & Andreas Obersteg & Annette Piorr, 2022. "Classifying New Hybrid Cooperation Models for Short Food-Supply Chains—Providing a Concept for Assessing Sustainability Transformation in the Urban-Rural Nexus," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-24, April.
    20. Andra-Cosmina Albulescu & Michael Manton & Daniela Larion & Per Angelstam, 2022. "The Winding Road towards Sustainable Forest Management in Romania, 1989–2022: A Case Study of Post-Communist Social–Ecological Transition," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-29, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:14:p:8012-:d:596475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.