IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/wuersc/6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Die Prüfungshonorare branchenspezialisierter Wirtschaftsprüfer in der deutschen Versicherungsbranche

Author

Listed:
  • Völker, Ulf Gunnar

Abstract

Trotz der immensen ökonomischen Bedeutung von Versicherungen für marktwirtschaftlich orientierte Volkswirtschaften haben sich bis dato nur wenige nationale und internationale Forschungsarbeiten dem Abschlussprüfermarkt für Versicherungsunternehmen gewidmet. Die vorliegende Arbeit hat sich dieser Thematik angenommen und liefert empirische Resultate bezüglich des Abschlussprüfermarktes für Versicherungsunternehmen in Deutschland. Neben einer detaillierten Strukturanalyse steht hierbei die Frage im Fokus, ob testierende Prüfungspartner, welche in Bezug auf die deutsche Versicherungsbranche einen hohen Spezialisierungsgrad aufweisen, die Höhe des erhobenen Prüfungshonorars beeinflussen. Dabei wird auch der Tatsache Rechnung getragen, dass in Deutschland gewöhnlich zwei Wirtschaftsprüfer (Links- und Rechtsunterzeichner) mit unterschiedlichen Aufgaben- und Verantwortungsbereichen den Jahres- bzw. den Konzernabschluss testieren. Die Resultate liefern Evidenz dafür, dass insbesondere Rechtsunterzeichner, denen entweder aufgrund ihres verhältnismäßig hohen Marktanteils bei Abschlussprüfungen in der Versicherungsbranche oder aufgrund ihrer Mitgliedschaft im IDW-Versicherungsfachausschuss ein hoher Spezialisierungsgrad zugesprochen wird, ökonomisch relevante Honoraraufschläge erzielen können.

Suggested Citation

  • Völker, Ulf Gunnar, 2021. "Die Prüfungshonorare branchenspezialisierter Wirtschaftsprüfer in der deutschen Versicherungsbranche," Studies in financial, managerial and tax accounting, University of Würzburg, Institute of Business Management, volume 6, number 6.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wuersc:6
    DOI: 10.25972/WUP-978-3-95826-157-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/248413/1/1780921136.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.25972/WUP-978-3-95826-157-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikko Zerni, 2012. "Audit Partner Specialization and Audit Fees: Some Evidence from Sweden," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 312-340, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jie & Cheng, Hanxiu & Qiao, Ke, 2025. "Does experience matter? An examination of individual Auditor's experience on executive implicit corruption," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    3. Cheng-Wen Lee & Min-Ying Cheng, 2024. "Audit Quality and Auditors' Party Membership: An Insightful Viewpoint into Financial Restatements," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(6), pages 1-9.
    4. Kuo, Nan-Ting & Li, Shu & Du, Ya-Guang & Lee, Cheng-Few, 2022. "Does individual auditor quality contribute to firm value? Evidence from the market valuation on corporate cash holdings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 135-153.
    5. Bedford, Anna & Bugeja, Martin & Czernkowski, Robert & Bond, David, 2023. "Is the effect of shared auditors driven by shared audit partners? The case of M&As," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    6. Wu, Bin & Wu, Yaqian & Zhang, Min & Li, Jiyuan, 2024. "Opening the black box of human resource allocations in audit firms: The assignment of audit partners to audit engagements," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    7. Marcus M. Doxey & James G. Lawson & Thomas J. Lopez & Quinn T. Swanquist, 2021. "Do Investors Care Who Did the Audit? Evidence from Form AP," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1741-1782, December.
    8. Timothy B. Bell & David B. Bryan, 2021. "Effectiveness, efficiency, and fee premiums in audits led by industry specialist partners," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4513-4572, September.
    9. Remzi Gözübüyük & Carl Joachim Kock & Murat Ünal, 2020. "Who appropriates centrality rents? The role of institutions in regulating social networks in the global Islamic finance industry," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(5), pages 764-787, July.
    10. Owusu, Andrews & O'Sullivan, Noel & Kwabi, Frank & Holmes, Mark, 2024. "Why Do Female Lead Auditors Charge a Fee Premium? Evidence from the UK Audit Market," CAFE Working Papers 26, Centre for Accountancy, Finance and Economics (CAFE), Birmingham City Business School, Birmingham City University.
    11. Suyon Kim, 2021. "Does Engagement Partners’ Effort Affect Audit Quality? With a Focus on the Effects of Internal Control System," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Kyungha Kari Lee & Carolyn B. Levine, 2020. "Audit partner identification and audit quality," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 778-809, June.
    13. Kris Hardies & Sarowar Hossain & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2021. "Archival research on audit partners: assessing the research field and recommendations for future research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4209-4256, September.
    14. Sarowar Hossain & Larelle Chapple & Gary S. Monroe, 2018. "Does auditor gender affect issuing going‐concern decisions for financially distressed clients?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(4), pages 1027-1061, December.
    15. Christopher Bleibtreu & Ulrike Stefani, 2024. "The interdependence between market structure and the quality of audited reports: the case of non-audit services," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1524-1574, June.
    16. Mohd Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni & Basioudis, Ilias G. & Hay, David, 2019. "Partner industry specialization and audit pricing in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 57-70.
    17. Zhang, Min & Xu, Haoran & Li, Xu, 2017. "The Effect of Previous Working Relationship between Rotating Partners on Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 101-121.
    18. Dekeyser, Simon & He, Xianjie & Xiao, Tusheng & Zuo, Luo, 2024. "Auditor industry range and audit quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2).
    19. Owusu, Andrews & O’Sullivan, Noel & Kwabi, Frank & Holmes, Mark David, 2024. "Why do female lead auditors charge a fee premium? evidence from the UK audit market," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Christoph Mauritz & Martin Nienhaus & Christopher Oehler, 2023. "The role of individual audit partners for narrative disclosures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 1-44, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wuersc:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/biwuede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.