IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/fomigs/315650.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The EU community pharmacy market: The density and its influencing factors

Editor

Listed:
  • FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifgs Institut für Gesundheit & Soziales

Author

Listed:
  • Schwaabe, Selina

Abstract

Community pharmacies deliver high-quality health care and are responsible for medication safety. The goal of the government is to ensure nationwide, accessible, and affordable medical health-care services provided by pharmacies. Therefore, the per capita density of community pharmacies matters. Overall, the density of community pharmacies fluctuates, with slightly decreasing tendencies in some countries. So far, studies have shown that changes in the system affect prices and density. However, an overview of the development of the density of European community pharmacies and its causes is still missing. This research is important to counteract decreasing density resulting in a lack of professional health care delivered through pharmacies. I focus on liberal versus regulated market structures and the regulation of mail-order of prescription drugs. The density of community pharmacies is increasingly becoming the focus of health-care policies. The supply of nationwide health-care services, especially with regard to recent pandemics, is important. Community pharmacies are not just a counter for prescription drugs. They deliver high-quality health advice and, in some cases, can replace a doctor's visit. Hence, a decline in the density of community pharmacies can affect people's health (care). During my research, I collected data on the number of community pharmacies per 100,000 inhabitants from 27 EU countries from 2000 to 2021. The motivation for this research comes from both a health-care policy and a personal perspective. I grew up in a pharmacist's household and worked at the family's pharmacy. During this time, I learned about the differences in pharmacy market regulations throughout the EU, which led me to question what influences pharmacy density.

Suggested Citation

  • Schwaabe, Selina, 2025. "The EU community pharmacy market: The density and its influencing factors," ifgs Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifgs Institut für Gesundheit & Soziales, volume 32, number 315650 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifgs Institut für Gesundheit & Soziales.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomigs:315650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/315650/1/1918635323.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vogler, Sabine & Habimana, Katharina & Arts, Danielle, 2014. "Does deregulation in community pharmacy impact accessibility of medicines, quality of pharmacy services and costs? Evidence from nine European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 311-327.
    2. Coenen, Michael & Haucap, Justus & Herr, Annika & Kuchinke, Björn A., 2011. "Wettbewerbspotenziale im deutschen Apothekenmarkt [The Potential for Competition between Pharmacies in Germany]," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 17, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    3. Marcin Wiśniewski & Urszula Religioni & Piotr Merks, 2020. "Community Pharmacies in Poland—The Journey from a Deregulated to a Strictly Regulated Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coenen, Michael & Haucap, Justus, 2013. "Kommunal- statt Missbrauchsaufsicht: Zur Aufsicht über Trinkwasserentgelte nach der 8. GWB-Novelle," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 53, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    2. Marcin Wiśniewski & Urszula Religioni & Piotr Merks, 2020. "Community Pharmacies in Poland—The Journey from a Deregulated to a Strictly Regulated Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, November.
    3. Vogler, Sabine & Zimmermann, Nina & de Joncheere, Kees, 2016. "Policy interventions related to medicines: Survey of measures taken in European countries during 2010–2015," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(12), pages 1363-1377.
    4. Piotr Merks & Urszula Religioni & Magdalena Waszyk-Nowaczyk & Justyna Kaźmierczak & Artur Białoszewski & Eliza Blicharska & Anna Kowalczuk & Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, 2022. "Assessment of Pharmacists’ Willingness to Conduct Medication Use Reviews in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-8, February.
    5. Barbarisi, Ilaria & Bruno, Giuseppe & Diglio, Antonio & Elizalde, Javier & Piccolo, Carmela, 2019. "A spatial analysis to evaluate the impact of deregulation policies in the pharmacy sector: Evidence from the case of Navarre," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(11), pages 1108-1115.
    6. Anna Kowalczuk & Alexandre Wong & Kevin Chung & Urszula Religioni & Dariusz Świetlik & Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman & Jameason D. Cameron & Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska & Katarina Fehir Šola & Justyna Kazm, 2022. "Patient Perceptions on Receiving Vaccination Services through Community Pharmacies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-8, February.
    7. Maximilian M. Gail & Georg Götz & Daniel Herold & Jan Schäfer, 2025. "Evaluation of a Partial Ban of Rx-Rebates in Germany Using Difference-in-Differences," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202505, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    8. Tomasz Zaprutko & Julia Cynar & Maria Sygit & Aleksandra Stolecka & Patrycja Skorupska & Paulina Jaszcz & Dorota Kopciuch & Anna Paczkowska & Piotr Ratajczak & Krzysztof Kus, 2024. "Medicines prices in International (Geary–Khamis) Dollar. The comparison between regulated and deregulated markets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-10, June.
    9. Jo, Wooyong & Nam, Hyoryung & Choi, Jeonghye, 2022. "Opening the OTC drug market: The effect of deregulation on retail pharmacy’s performance," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 847-866.
    10. Ana Moura & Pedro Pita Barros, 2020. "Entry and price competition in the over‐the‐counter drug market after deregulation: Evidence from Portugal," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(8), pages 865-877, August.
    11. Gallone, Emma Luisa & Ravetto Enri, Lorenzo & Pignata, Irene & Baratta, Francesca & Brusa, Paola, 2020. "The 2017 deregulation of pharmacies in Italy: Introducing non-pharmacist ownership," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(12), pages 1281-1286.
    12. Jaroslav Písek, 2020. "Future perspectives of independent pharmacies in the Czech Republic - Comparative analysis of selected financial indicators of independent pharmacies," Economics Working Papers 2020-01, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, revised 21 Feb 2020.
    13. Maja Andrzejewska & Urszula Religioni & Paweł Piątkiewicz & Agnieszka Barańska & Jolanta Herda & Aleksandra Czerw & Jerzy Krysiński & Piotr Merks, 2022. "Public Perception of Pharmacists in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, February.
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0205087 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Kališ, Richard, 2024. "From symbiosis to independence: Investigating changes in the relationship between general practitioners’ presence and pharmacies’ market size in Slovakia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. Coenen Michael & Haucap Justus & Herr Annika & Kuchinke Björn A., 2011. "Wettbewerbspotenziale im deutschen Apothekenmarkt / The Potential for Competition between Pharmacies in Germany," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 62(1), pages 205-230, January.
    17. Moura, Ana, 2021. "Essays in health economics," Other publications TiSEM c93abd22-fa4a-42a5-b172-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Bruno, Giuseppe & Cavola, Manuel & Diglio, Antonio & Elizalde, Javier & Piccolo, Carmela, 2022. "A locational analysis of deregulation policies in the Spanish retail pharmaceutical sector," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PA).
    19. Martins, Lurdes & Queirós, Sónia, 2015. "Competition among pharmacies and the typology of services delivered: The Portuguese case," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(5), pages 640-647.
    20. Håkonsen, Helle & Sundell, Karolina Andersson & Martinsson, Johan & Hedenrud, Tove, 2016. "Consumer preferences for over-the-counter drug retailers in the reregulated Swedish pharmacy market," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(3), pages 327-333.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomigs:315650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.