IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/pup/pbooks/10248.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences

Author

Listed:
  • Herbert Gintis

    (Santa Fe Institute
    Central European University)

Abstract

Game theory is central to understanding human behavior and relevant to all of the behavioral sciences—from biology and economics, to anthropology and political science. However, as The Bounds of Reason demonstrates, game theory alone cannot fully explain human behavior and should instead complement other key concepts championed by the behavioral disciplines. Herbert Gintis shows that just as game theory without broader social theory is merely technical bravado, so social theory without game theory is a handicapped enterprise. This edition has been thoroughly revised and updated. Reinvigorating game theory, The Bounds of Reason offers innovative thinking for the behavioral sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Herbert Gintis, 2014. "The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10248.
    • Handle: RePEc:pup:pbooks:10248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanappi, Hardy, 2019. "A Global Revolutionary Class will ride the Tiger of Alienation," MPRA Paper 96956, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Pilli, Luis & Swait, Joffre & Mazzon, José Afonso, 2022. "Jeopardizing brand profitability by misattributing process heterogeneity to preference heterogeneity," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    3. Obrimah, Oghenovo A., 2023. "Outside of a sole globally risk averse agent, all other agents in markets are risk seeking agents," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    4. Henri Kuokkanen & Frederic Bouchon, 2021. "When team play matters: Building revenue management in tourism destinations," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(2), pages 379-397, March.
    5. Jarke-Neuert, Johannes & Perino, Grischa & Schwickert, Henrike, 2021. "Free-Riding for Future: Field Experimental Evidence of Strategic Substitutability in Climate Protest," SocArXiv sh6dm, Center for Open Science.
    6. Kjell Hausken, 2018. "Formalizing the Precautionary Principle Accounting for Strategic Interaction, Natural Factors, and Technological Factors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2055-2072, October.
    7. Russell Weaver, 2015. "A Cross-Level Exploratory Analysis of “Neighborhood Effects” on Urban Behavior: An Evolutionary Perspective," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Mahmoodi, K. & Grigolini, P. & West, B.J., 2018. "On social sensitivity to either zealot or independent minorities," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 185-190.
    9. Korosh Mahmoodi & Bruce J. West & Paolo Grigolini, 2018. "Self-Organized Temporal Criticality: Bottom-Up Resilience versus Top-Down Vulnerability," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-10, March.
    10. Johnson, Noel, 2015. "Taxes, National Identity, and Nation Building: Evidence from France," MPRA Paper 63598, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Jennifer A. Loughmiller-Cardinal & James Scott Cardinal, 2023. "The Behavior of Information: A Reconsideration of Social Norms," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, April.
    12. Minnameier, Gerhard & Bonowski, Tim Jonas, 2021. "Morality and Trust in Impersonal Relationships," VfS Annual Conference 2021 (Virtual Conference): Climate Economics 242438, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pup:pbooks:10248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://press.princeton.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.