IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/320729.html

Trustworthy and human-centric? The new governance of workplace AI technologies under the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act

Author

Listed:
  • Özkiziltan, Didem
  • Landini, Fabio

Abstract

The increasing use of AI technologies in the workplace raises significant concerns about their implications for workers’ rights and the future of work. The EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act aims to ensure that innovation is not at the expense of fundamental rights. While the Act seeks to promote human-centric and trustworthy AI applications, this article highlights several regulatory gaps that are likely to foster two key trends shaping the future of work in Europe: the increasing autonomy of AI tech companies over the design of workplace AI and the reinforcement of power imbalances in the workplace. These trends leave EU workplaces vulnerable to biased and intrusive AI, thereby hindering the fair integration of AI into the work of the future. This article critiques the Act’s shortcomings in regulating AI at work and advocates a dedicated EU directive to mitigate adverse impacts of AI in the workplace and reinforce human-centric AI principles for societal benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Özkiziltan, Didem & Landini, Fabio, 2025. "Trustworthy and human-centric? The new governance of workplace AI technologies under the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 503-517.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:320729
    DOI: 10.1177/10242589251336193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/320729.2/3/Full-text-article-Oezkiziltan-Landini-Trustworthy.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10242589251336193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moore, Phoebe V., 2019. "The mirror for (artificial) intelligence: Working in whose reflection?," Discussion Papers, Research Group Globalization, Work, and Production SP III 2019-302, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Erik Brynjolfsson & Tom Mitchell & Daniel Rock, 2018. "What Can Machines Learn, and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy?," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 43-47, May.
    3. Ljubica Nedelkoska & Glenda Quintini, 2018. "Automation, skills use and training," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 202, OECD Publishing.
    4. Sha Yuan & Zhou Shao & Xingxing Wei & Jie Tang & Wendy Hall & Yongli Wang & Ying Wang & Ye Wang, 2020. "Science behind AI: the evolution of trend, mobility, and collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 993-1013, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Didem Özkiziltan & Fabio Landini, 2025. "Trustworthy and human-centric? The new governance of workplace AI technologies under the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 31(4), pages 503-517, November.
    2. Hensvik, Lena & Skans, Oskar Nordström, 2023. "The skill-specific impact of past and projected occupational decline," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    4. Pelin Ozgul & Marie-Christine Fregin & Michael Stops & Simon Janssen & Mark Levels, 2024. "High-skilled Human Workers in Non-Routine Jobs are Susceptible to AI Automation but Wage Benefits Differ between Occupations," Papers 2404.06472, arXiv.org.
    5. Corrales‑Herrero, Helena & Rodriguez-Prado, Beatriz, 2022. "Mapping the Occupations of Recent Graduates. The Role of Academic Background in the Digital Era," MPRA Paper 123226, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Aug 2024.
    6. Antonio Dalla Zuanna & Davide Dottori & Elena Gentili & Salvatore Lattanzio, 2024. "An assessment of occupational exposure to artificial intelligence in Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 878, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Anna V. Tikhonova, 2023. "Development of Tax Incentives for Investments in Human Capital," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 1, pages 116-133, February.
    8. Casas Pablo & Fernandez Macias Enrique & Martinez Plumed Fernando & Gomez Emilia & Gonzalez Vazquez Ignacio & Salotti Simone, 2026. "Revisiting the occupational impact of AI in the generative AI era," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2026-02, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Fossen, Frank M. & Sorgner, Alina, 2022. "New digital technologies and heterogeneous wage and employment dynamics in the United States: Evidence from individual-level data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Laura Abrardi & Carlo Cambini & Laura Rondi, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, firms and consumer behavior: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 969-991, September.
    11. Michèle Belot & Bart K. de Koning & Didier Fouarge & Philipp Kircher & Paul Muller & Sandra Phlippen, 2025. "Advising Job Seekers in Occupations with Poor Prospects: A Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 33819, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Innocenti, Stefania & Golin, Marta, 2022. "Human capital investment and perceived automation risks: Evidence from 16 countries," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 27-41.
    13. Fabio Montobbio & Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito & Marco Vivarelli, 2021. "Labour-saving automation and occupational exposure: a text-similarity measure," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0021, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    14. Nikolova, Milena & Cnossen, Femke & Nikolaev, Boris, 2024. "Robots, meaning, and self-determination," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
    15. Helena Corrales-Herrero & Beatriz Rodríguez-Prado, 2024. "Mapping the Occupations of Recent Graduates. The Role of Academic Background in the Digital Era," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 65(8), pages 1853-1882, December.
    16. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    17. Gao, Jie & Li, Zhizhuo & Nguyen, Thithuha & Zhang, Wentao, 2025. "Digital transformation and enterprise employment," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    18. Christos Makridis & Christos A. Makridis, 2025. "The Labor Market Effect of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Artists," CESifo Working Paper Series 12368, CESifo.
    19. Singh, Anuraag & Triulzi, Giorgio & Magee, Christopher L., 2021. "Technological improvement rate predictions for all technologies: Use of patent data and an extended domain description," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
    20. Wu, Jiang & Ou, Guiyan & Liu, Xiaohui & Dong, Ke, 2022. "How does academic education background affect top researchers’ performance? Evidence from the field of artificial intelligence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:320729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.