IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/266365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics and determinants of right-wing populist mobilisation in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Hellmeier, Sebastian
  • Vüllers, Johannes

Abstract

Western Europe has recently experienced increasing protest mobilisation by right-wing populist movements. Although these movements are receiving increasing scholarly attention, systematic data on protest activities is limited. In this research note, original data is used to describe the protest activity of Germany’s Pegida movement across space and time and to explore the city-level determinants of protest mobilisation. The protest dataset records 373 events with more than 337,000 participants in major cities between 2014 and 2017. The data documents the involvement of right extremists during the protests and illustrates the movement’s nativist and anti-elitist orientation. The correlational analysis of the determinants of protest activity shows that protests are less likely in cities with a large foreign-born population and lower income levels. Moreover, protests correlate with vote shares for the right-wing populist party AfD, underlining the party-movement linkage and the local entrenchment of right-wing ideology.

Suggested Citation

  • Hellmeier, Sebastian & Vüllers, Johannes, 2022. "Dynamics and determinants of right-wing populist mobilisation in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest Ar, pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:266365
    DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2022.2135909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/266365/1/Full-text-article-Hellmeier-et-al-Dynamics-and-determinants.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01402382.2022.2135909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Borbáth, Endre & Gessler, Theresa, 2020. "Different worlds of contention? Protest in Northwestern, Southern and Eastern Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 910-935.
    2. Simon N. Wood & Natalya Pya & Benjamin Säfken, 2016. "Smoothing Parameter and Model Selection for General Smooth Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(516), pages 1548-1563, October.
    3. Kai Arzheimer, 2009. "Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 259-275, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthijs Rooduijn & Brian Burgoon & Erika J van Elsas & Herman G van de Werfhorst, 2017. "Radical distinction: Support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(4), pages 536-559, December.
    2. Borbáth, Endre & Hunger, Sophia & Hutter, Swen & Oana, Ioana-Elena, 2021. "Civic and Political Engagement during the Multifaceted COVID-19 Crisis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 311-324.
    3. Martin Halla & Alexander F. Wagner & Josef Zweimüller, 2017. "Immigration and Voting for the Far Right," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 15(6), pages 1341-1385.
    4. Migheli, Matteo, 2022. "Lost in election. How different electoral systems translate the voting gender gap into gender representation bias," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. repec:ces:ifodic:v:15:y:2018:i:4:p:50000000000855 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Alabrese, Eleonora & Becker, Sascha O. & Fetzer, Thiemo & Novy, Dennis, 2019. "Who voted for Brexit? Individual and regional data combined," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 132-150.
    7. Sun, Tianyu & Chand, Satish & Sharpe, Keiran, 2018. "Effect of aging on housing prices: evidence from a panel data," MPRA Paper 94418, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Mar 2019.
    8. Han Werts & Peer Scheepers & Marcel Lubbers, 2013. "Euro-scepticism and radical right-wing voting in Europe, 2002–2008: Social cleavages, socio-political attitudes and contextual characteristics determining voting for the radical right," European Union Politics, , vol. 14(2), pages 183-205, June.
    9. Haiqing Hu & Pandu R. Tadikamalla, 2020. "When to launch a sales promotion for online fashion products? An empirical study," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 737-756, December.
    10. Andrea Junqueira & Ali Kagalwala & Christine S. Lipsmeyer, 2023. "What's your problem? How issue ownership and partisan discourse influence personal concerns," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 104(1), pages 25-37, January.
    11. Stefano Cabras & J. James Reade & J.D. Tena, 2018. "Social Pressure or Rational Reactions to Incentives? A Historical Analysis of Reasons for Referee Bias in the Spanish Football," Working Papers 20189, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    12. Hahn, Anja M. & Kholodilin, Konstantin A. & Waltl, Sofie R., 2020. "Forward to the Past: Short-Term Effects of the Rent Freeze in Berlin," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 308, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. Peter Pütz & Thomas Kneib, 2018. "A penalized spline estimator for fixed effects panel data models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 145-166, April.
    14. Ursula Laa & Dianne Cook, 2020. "Using tours to visually investigate properties of new projection pursuit indexes with application to problems in physics," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1171-1205, September.
    15. Hervé Cardot & Antonio Musolesi, 2019. "Modeling temporal treatment effects with zero inflated semi-parametric regression models: the case of local development policies in France," SEEDS Working Papers 0219, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jan 2019.
    16. Sun-Joo Cho & Sarah Brown-Schmidt & Paul De Boeck & Matthew Naveiras & Si On Yoon & Aaron Benjamin, 2023. "Incorporating Functional Response Time Effects into a Signal Detection Theory Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 1056-1086, September.
    17. Tomberg, Lukas & Smith Stegen, Karen & Vance, Colin, 2021. "“The mother of all political problems”? On asylum seekers and elections," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    18. Gidron, Noam & Mijs, Jonathan Jan Benjamin, 2019. "Do changes in material circumstances drive support for populist radical parties? Panel data evidence from The Netherlands during the Great Recession, 2007–2015," SocArXiv w4e6s, Center for Open Science.
    19. repec:zbw:bofitp:2020_020 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Frank van Berkum & Katrien Antonio & Michel Vellekoop, 2021. "Quantifying longevity gaps using micro‐level lifetime data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(2), pages 548-570, April.
    21. Guido España & Yutong Yao & Kathryn B Anderson & Meagan C Fitzpatrick & David L Smith & Amy C Morrison & Annelies Wilder-Smith & Thomas W Scott & T Alex Perkins, 2019. "Model-based assessment of public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination following screening for prior exposure," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, July.
    22. Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Planning transport for social inclusion: An accessibility-activity participation approach," SocArXiv ap7wh, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:266365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.