IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/zirebs/v21y2018i1p105-118.html

Crowdfunding in a Context of Financing Firms Through Their Life Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Tin Horvatinović Silvije Orsag

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, Croatia University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

In this paper we first present some developed theories of financing that firms might accord with in their development stages. The framework, assumptions and predictions of the capital structure of firms in each theory is shown. Afterwards, crowdfunding, as a fairly new source of financing that is increasing significance, is described and is differentiated on the basis of the type of return on investment for the outside investors. In recent literature there have been models that introduce crowdfunding in the framework of financing firms through their life cycle stages. We point the difficulty of encompassing crowdfunding in the mentioned models because of characteristics that are unique to it from the perspective of the investor and the firm. While it is not surprising that crowdfunding is used in development stages, these characteristics make it difficult to construct a model of financing firms that has traditional means of financing and crowdfunding. JEL Classification: G32, L26

Suggested Citation

  • Tin Horvatinović Silvije Orsag, 2018. "Crowdfunding in a Context of Financing Firms Through Their Life Cycle," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 21(1), pages 105-118, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:zirebs:v:21:y:2018:i:1:p:105-118
    DOI: 10.2478/zireb-2018-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=295782
    Download Restriction: Abstract only available on-line
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/zireb-2018-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mollick, Ethan, 2014. "The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Harris, Milton & Raviv, Artur, 1991. "The Theory of Capital Structure," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(1), pages 297-355, March.
    3. BELLEFLAMME, Paul & LAMBERT, Thomas & SCHWIENBACHER, Armin, 2011. "Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011032, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Richard Harrison, 2013. "Crowdfunding and the revitalisation of the early stage risk capital market: catalyst or chimera?," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 283-287, October.
    5. Raghuram Rajan & Luigi Zingales, 1998. "Debt, Folklore, And Cross‐Country Differences In Financial Structure," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 10(4), pages 102-107, January.
    6. James S. Ang & James Wuh Lin & Floyd Tyler, 1995. "Evidence on the Lack of Separation between Business and Personal Risks among Small Businesses," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 4(2), pages 197-210, Fall.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friedemann Polzin & Helen Toxopeus & Erik Stam, 2018. "The wisdom of the crowd in funding: information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 251-273, February.
    2. Tuo Gladys & Yi Feng & Sarpong Solomon & Wang Wenxin, 2020. "The Second Round Resource Acquisition of Entrepreneurial Crowdfunded Ventures: The Relevance of Campaign and Project Implementation Performance Outcomes," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Denis Frydrych & Tony Kinder, 2015. "How New Is Crowdfunding? The Venture Capital Evolution without Revolution – Discourse on Risk Capital Themes and their Relevance to Poland (Jak nowe jest zjawisko finansowana spolecznosciowego? Ewolucja kapitalu wysokiego ryzyka bez rewolucji – rozwa," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(56), pages 177-194.
    4. Stéphane Onnee & Sophie Renault, 2015. "Crowdfunding: principles, trends and issues," Post-Print hal-01712731, HAL.
    5. Miglo, Anton, 2022. "Theories of financing for entrepreneurial firms: a review," MPRA Paper 115835, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Yixiao Li & Zhanda Zhang & Ruiqin Wang & Yuangao Chen, 2019. "Consumer Purchase Intention toward Crowdfunding Products/Services: A Cost–Benefit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Kukurba Maria & Waszkiewicz Aneta, 2018. "Crowdfunding as a Form of Funding for Businesses in the Culturally-Changing Global Economy: A Literature Review," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 99-137, June.
    8. Jan Janku & Zuzana Kucerova, 2018. "Successful Crowdfunding Campaigns: The Role of Project Specifics, Competition and Founders’ Experience," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 68(4), pages 351-373, September.
    9. Susan Coleman & Carmen Cotei & Joseph Farhat, 2016. "The debt-equity financing decisions of U.S. startup firms," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 40(1), pages 105-126, January.
    10. Anton Miglo, 2022. "Theories of Crowdfunding and Token Issues: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
    11. Miglo, Anton, 2018. "Crowdfunding in a duopoly under asymmetric information," MPRA Paper 89016, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Kuti, Mónika & Galambosné Tiszberger, Mónika & Czigler, Enikő, 2018. "Magyarországról indított közösségi finanszírozású kampányok. A Kickstarter-platform esete [Kick-starter campaigns launched from Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 206-225.
    13. Lars Hornuf & Armin Schwienbacher, 2015. "Funding Dynamics in Crowdinvesting," Research Papers in Economics 2015-09, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    14. Nguyen, Minh-Hoang & Huyen, Nguyen Thanh Thanh & Pham, Thanh-Hang & Yen, Nguyen Thi Quynh & Vuong, Quan-Hoang, 2020. "On the 50-year research landscape of entrepreneurial finance: A sign of Western ideological homogeneity?," OSF Preprints qf62s, Center for Open Science.
    15. Hossain Mokter & Oparaocha Gospel Onyema, 2017. "Crowdfunding: Motives, Definitions, Typology and Ethical Challenges," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Bagheri, Afsaneh & Chitsazan, Hasti & Ebrahimi, Ashkan, 2019. "Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 218-232.
    17. Walthoff-Borm, Xavier & Schwienbacher, Armin & Vanacker, Tom, 2018. "Equity crowdfunding: First resort or last resort?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 513-533.
    18. Lynda Y. de la Viña & Stephanie Lee Black, 2018. "US Equity Crowdfunding: A Review of Current Legislation and A Conceptual Model of the Implications for Equity Funding," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 27(1), pages 83-110, March.
    19. Baucus, Melissa S. & Mitteness, Cheryl R., 2016. "Crowdfrauding: Avoiding Ponzi entrepreneurs when investing in new ventures," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 37-50.
    20. Grazia Cecere & Fabrice Le Guel & Fabrice Rochelandet, 2017. "Crowdfunding and social influence: an empirical investigation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(57), pages 5802-5813, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:zirebs:v:21:y:2018:i:1:p:105-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jurica Šimurina The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Jurica Šimurina to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.