IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/market/v26y2014i1p93-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Perceptions about Role of Faculty and Administrative Staff in Business Education Service Quality Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić

    (School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo)

  • Selma Kadić-Maglajlić

    (School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo)

  • Muris Čičić

    (School of Economics and Business, University of Sarajevo)

Abstract

This paper focuses on dimensions of the perceived service quality measurement for business schools. We propose an adapted SERVQUAL measure of expected and perceived quality, where employees at business schools are split into two groups: faculty and administrative staff, and assessed separately. This measure represents a tool for comparable service quality assessment at business schools. Empirical data were collected among undergraduate students in a developing economy. A total of 282 respondents were used to assess the overall fit of the proposed model and to test the differences between the expectations and the perceptions of service quality in a business school. The results support usability of the proposed adapted SERVQUAL measure. Therefore, the study contributes to the existing literature reporting the findings on service quality in an educational context.

Suggested Citation

  • Maja Arslanagić-Kalajdžić & Selma Kadić-Maglajlić & Muris Čičić, 2014. "Students’ Perceptions about Role of Faculty and Administrative Staff in Business Education Service Quality Assessment," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 26(1), pages 93-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:26:y:2014:i:1:p:93-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/182264
    Download Restriction: None
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helm, Sabrina, 2011. "Employees' awareness of their impact on corporate reputation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 657-663, July.
    2. Anita Ciunova-Shuleska & Nikolina Palamidovska & Marija Grishin, 2013. "An empirical assessment of service quality in the context of travel agencies in the Republic of Macedonia," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 25(1), pages 21-36.
    3. Ariana Nefat & Nika Paus, 2008. "Determinants of customer satisfaction with service encounter," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 20(2), pages 195-210.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jose Benitez & Laura Ruiz & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-02462583, HAL.
    2. Kaveh Moghaddam & Thomas Weber & Pouya Seifzadeh & Sara Azarpanah, 2021. "Internal Reputation of the Firm: CEO Retention and Firm Market Performance," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 205-221, November.
    3. Qing Huan & Niu ZhanWen, 2018. "Knowledge management in consultancy involved LPS implementation projects via social media," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, March.
    4. Gross, Hellen P. & Ingerfurth, Stefan & Willems, Jurgen, 2021. "Employees as reputation advocates: Dimensions of employee job satisfaction explaining employees’ recommendation intention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 405-413.
    5. Nha Nguyen & Gaston LeBlanc, 2018. "The Combined Effects of Service Offering and Service Employees on the Perceived Corporate Reputation," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(2), pages 129-146, April.
    6. Carlos Ferro-Soto & Luz Amparo Macías-Quintana & Paula Vázquez-Rodríguez, 2018. "Effect of Stakeholders-Oriented Behavior on the Performance of Sustainable Business," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    7. Isabel Olmedo-Cifuentes & Inocencia Martínez-León & Gary Davies, 2014. "Managing internal stakeholders’ views of corporate reputation," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 8(1), pages 83-111, March.
    8. Lorena Bašan & Jelena Kapeš & Ana Kamenečki, 2021. "Tourist Satisfaction as a Driver of Destination Marketing Improvements: The Case of the Opatija Riviera," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 33(1), pages 93-112.
    9. Maria da Graça Marques Casimiro Almeida & Arnaldo Fernandes Matos Coelho, 2019. "The Antecedents of Corporate Reputation and Image and Their Impacts on Employee Commitment and Performance: The Moderating Role of CSR," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 10-25, February.
    10. Cloos, Janis, 2021. "Employer Review Platforms – Do the Rating Environment and Platform Design affect the Informativeness of Reviews? Theory, Evidence, and Suggestions," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 32(3), pages 152-181.
    11. Wæraas, Arild & Dahle, Dag Yngve, 2020. "When reputation management is people management: Implications for employee voice," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 277-287.
    12. Baruk Agnieszka Izabela, 2015. "Style of Management and Chosen Sentiments and Attitudes Among Employees of Scientific Organizations," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Hana URBANCOVA & Petr RICHTER & Lenka KUCIRKOVA & Martina JARKOVSKA, 2017. "Employer branding in the agricultural sector: making a company attractive for the potential employees," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(5), pages 217-227.
    14. Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Stephen Pain & Carola Hillenbrand, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 193-211, November.
    15. Ali, Imran & Ali, Murad & Grigore, Georgiana & Molesworth, Mike & Jin, Zhongqi, 2020. "The moderating role of corporate reputation and employee-company identification on the work-related outcomes of job insecurity resulting from workforce localization policies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 825-838.
    16. Jinguo Zhao & Huanxin Liu & Wei Sun, 2020. "How Proactive Environmental Strategy Facilitates Environmental Reputation: Roles of Green Human Resource Management and Discretionary Slack," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Korzynski, Pawel & Mazurek, Grzegorz & Haenlein, Michael, 2020. "Leveraging employees as spokespeople in your HR strategy: How company-related employee posts on social media can help firms to attract new talent," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 204-212.
    18. Schaarschmidt, Mario & Walsh, Gianfranco, 2020. "Social media-driven antecedents and consequences of employees' awareness of their impact on corporate reputation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 718-726.
    19. Adnan A. S. Alali, 2023. "Stimuli of Organization Citizenship Behavior and Performance: The Moderating Role of Organizational Strategy Awareness," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(1), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Young Kim & Hyojung Park, 2017. "Is there Still a PR Problem Online? Exploring the Effects of Different Sources and Crisis Response Strategies in Online Crisis Communication Via Social Media," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(1), pages 76-104, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:26:y:2014:i:1:p:93-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanja Komarac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.