IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/busexc/v16y2022i1p9-30.html

The Role Of External Motivation Factors, Sociodemographic Characteristics And Communication Channels In Frequency Of Donations To Non-Profit Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Doria Bavčević

  • Ljiljana Najev Čačija

    (University of Split, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, Croatia)

  • Mario Pepur

    (University of Split, Faculty of Economics, Business and Tourism, Croatia)

Abstract

Long-term trends indicate a steady increase in the number and importance of non-profit organizations in the community, which means increased competition, a market-oriented approach and a relentless struggle for less available financial resources. In the overall structure of funding sources, donations from individual donors play a significant role. Therefore, this research aims to determine the role of socio-demographic characteristics, external motivation factors, and communication channels in individual donors' donation frequency. Empirical research was conducted on a sample of individual donors in Croatia. The results show a statistically significant difference in the donation frequency in relation to self-assessment of the external motivational factors rewards, non-profit leadership, personal gain and future interests. The highest mean rank for external motivational factors is shown in the group of frequent donors. The differences were not determined for the factors environment, motivation, trust, organizational and user characteristics. For socio-demographic factors, differences among groups by donation frequency are determined by gender, age and employment status. Results showed no significant differences in the level of education. Finally, a significant difference was confirmed for communication channels usage, with a higher mean rank for donors using social networks than traditional channels. These results contribute to the existing body of knowledge of donors' behavior in the context of fundraising success, whose performance is one of the essential prerequisites for the sustainability of the non-profit sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Doria Bavčević & Ljiljana Najev Čačija & Mario Pepur, 2022. "The Role Of External Motivation Factors, Sociodemographic Characteristics And Communication Channels In Frequency Of Donations To Non-Profit Organizations," Poslovna izvrsnost-Business Excellence, University of Zagreb Faculty of Economics & Business, vol. 16(1), pages 9-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:9-30
    DOI: 10.22598/pi-be/2022.16.1.9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/403859
    Download Restriction: None
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22598/pi-be/2022.16.1.9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine R. Cooper, 2017. "Nonprofit participation in collective impact: A comparative case," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 499-514, August.
    2. Gras, David & Mendoza-Abarca, Karla I., 2014. "Risky business? The survival implications of exploiting commercial opportunities by nonprofits," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 392-404.
    3. Apinunmahakul, Amornrat & Devlin, Rose Anne, 2008. "Social networks and private philanthropy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 309-328, February.
    4. Okten, Cagla & Weisbrod, Burton A., 2000. "Determinants of donations in private nonprofit markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 255-272, February.
    5. Matthias Tietz & Simon Parker, 2014. "Charitable donations by the self-employed," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 899-916, December.
    6. Xia Li & Linyan Feng, 2021. "Impact of donors’ financial fairness perception on donation intention in nonprofit organizations after COVID-19 outbreak," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adnan Q. Khan & Steven F. Lehrer, 2013. "The Impact of Social Networks on Labour Market Outcomes: New Evidence from Cape Breton," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 39(s1), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Paskalev, Zdravko & Yildirim, Huseyin, 2017. "A theory of outsourced fundraising: Why dollars turn into “Pennies for Charity”," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1-18.
    3. Jochimsen, Beate, 2019. "Christmas lights in Berlin: New empirical evidence for the private provision of a public good," FiFo Discussion Papers - Finanzwissenschaftliche Diskussionsbeiträge 19-04, University of Cologne, FiFo Institute for Public Economics.
    4. Keval Amin & Erica Harris, 2022. "The Effect of Investor Sentiment on Nonprofit Donations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(2), pages 427-450, January.
    5. Tinkelman, Daniel, 2004. "Using nonprofit organization-level financial data to infer managers' fund-raising strategies," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(9-10), pages 2181-2192, August.
    6. He Tingting, 2021. "Comparing Money and Time Donation: What Do Experiments Tell Us?," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 41(3), pages 65-94, September.
    7. Korenok, Oleg & Millner, Edward L. & Razzolini, Laura, 2013. "Impure altruism in dictators' giving," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Katia Melnik & Jean-Benoît Zimmermann, 2008. "An Economic Approach To Voluntary Association," Working Papers halshs-00347448, HAL.
    9. Makoto Kakinaka & Koji Kotani, 2011. "An interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on voluntary contributions to a public good in a large economy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 147(1), pages 29-41, April.
    10. Reinstein, David, 2006. "Does One Contribution Come at the Expense of Another? Empirical Evidence on Substitution Between Charitable Donations," Economics Discussion Papers 2938, University of Essex, Department of Economics.
    11. Molecke, Greg & Pinkse, Jonatan, 2017. "Accountability for social impact: A bricolage perspective on impact measurement in social enterprises," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 550-568.
    12. Sophie Bacq & Kimberly A. Eddleston, 2018. "A Resource-Based View of Social Entrepreneurship: How Stewardship Culture Benefits Scale of Social Impact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 589-611, October.
    13. Vicky Barham & Rose Anne Devlin & Rebekah Owusu, 2017. "Strategic Philanthropists: Who Are They and Do They Matter?," Working Papers 1717E, University of Ottawa, Department of Economics.
    14. Friedemann Polzin & Helen Toxopeus & Erik Stam, 2018. "The wisdom of the crowd in funding: information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 251-273, February.
    15. Elizabeth A. M. Searing, 2023. "Beyond Donations: Isomorphism and Revenue Mix in Nonprofit Start-Ups," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    16. Friedel Bolle & Yves Breitmoser & Jana Heimel & Claudia Vogel, 2012. "Multiple motives of pro-social behavior: evidence from the solidarity game," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 303-321, March.
    17. Belayet Hossain & Laura Lamb, 2015. "An assessment of the impact of tax incentives relative to socio-economic characteristics on charitable giving in Canada," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 65-80, January.
    18. Zachary Halberstam & James R. Hines Jr., 2023. "Quality-Aware Tax Incentives for Charitable Contributions," CESifo Working Paper Series 10250, CESifo.
    19. Amir Borges Ferreira Neto, 2018. "Charity and public libraries: Does government funding crowd out donations?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(4), pages 525-542, November.
    20. James Andreoni & Abigail Payne, 2007. "Crowding out Both Sides of the Philanthropy Market: Evidence from a Panel of Charities," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000001769, UCLA Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:9-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dario Dunković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.