IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v53y2014i4p499-515.html

P3 Alliance and Its Implications on Contestability in Major Gateway Ports in North America

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Yim Yap

Abstract

The P3 Alliance consists of the three biggest container shipping lines in the world. Together, Maersk Line, Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), and CMA CGM will command a combined market share of 36.4 percent of the world's active shipping capacity. Major gateway container ports in North America play a crucial role in serving the largest economy in the world and respective hinterlands that are embedded within. As such, the article aims to examine the impact of the P3 Alliance and its implications on contestability in the major gateway container ports in North America. Our analysis contends that the alliance should not be a cause of concern for the key ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach on the West Coast of the United States as the combined market share in terms of shipping capacity supplied matches up to existing capacity supplied by the largest of the other shipping alliances. However, the significantly higher market share for shipping capacity deployed by the alliance at major gateway container ports on the East Coast of the United States and stakeholding by Maersk Line's sister company APM Terminals and MSC's subsidiary Terminals Investment Limited in some of the ports could raise concerns for potential abuse of market power.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Yim Yap, 2014. "P3 Alliance and Its Implications on Contestability in Major Gateway Ports in North America," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(4), pages 499-515, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:53:y:2014:i:4:p:499-515
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.53.4.0499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.53.4.0499
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.53.4.0499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. HEAVER, T. & MEERSMAN, Hilde & MOGLIA, F. & VAN DE VOORDE ,Eddy, "undated". "Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?," Working Papers 2000001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. Yang, Dong & Liu, Miaojia & Shi, Xiaoning, 2011. "Verifying liner Shipping Alliance’s stability by applying core theory," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 15-24.
    3. Angela S Bergantino & Albert W Veenstra, 2002. "Interconnection and Co-ordination: An Application of Network Theory to Liner Shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 4(3), pages 231-248, September.
    4. Sys, Christa, 2009. "Is the container liner shipping industry an oligopoly?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 259-270, September.
    5. Brian Slack & Claude Comtois & Robert McCalla, 2002. "Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 65-76, January.
    6. Michael Fusillo, 2006. "Some notes on structure and stability in liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(5), pages 463-475.
    7. T. Heaver & H. Meersman & F. Moglia & E. Van De Voorde, 2000. "Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 363-373.
    8. Claudio Ferrari & Francesco Parola & Marco Benacchio, 2008. "Network economies in liner shipping: the role of home markets," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 127-143, April.
    9. Yuh‐Horng Wen, 2012. "Impact of Collaborative Transportation Management on Logistics Capability and Competitive Advantage for the Carrier," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(4), pages 452-473, October.
    10. D. K. Ryoo & H. A. Thanopoulou, 1999. "Liner alliances in the globalization era: a strategic tool for Asian container carriers," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 349-367, October.
    11. Heaver, T. & Meersman, H. & Moglia, F. & van de Voorde, E., 2000. "Do Mergers and Alliances Influence European Shipping and Port Competition?," Research Papers 24175, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economic Sciences.
    12. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Wei Yim Yap, 2011. "Container port competition and complementarity in supply chain systems: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 13(2), pages 102-120, June.
    13. Jasmine S. L. Lam & Wei Yim Yap & Kevin Cullinane, 2007. "Structure, conduct and performance on the major liner shipping routes 1," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 359-381, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Ghorbani & Michele Acciaro & Sandra Transchel & Pierre Cariou, 2022. "Strategic alliances in container shipping: A review of the literature and future research agenda," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 439-465, June.
    2. Panayides, Photis M. & Wiedmer, Robert, 2011. "Strategic alliances in container liner shipping," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-38.
    3. Daniele Crotti & Claudio Ferrari & Alessio Tei, 2020. "Merger waves and alliance stability in container shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 446-472, September.
    4. Dung-Ying Lin & Chien-Chih Huang & ManWo Ng, 2017. "The coopetition game in international liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 474-495, May.
    5. Abraham Zhang & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2014. "Impacts of Schedule Reliability and Sailing Frequency on the Liner Shipping and Port Industry: A Study of Daily Maersk," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 235-253, April.
    6. Antoine Fremont & F Parola & Martin Soppe, 2007. "Vertical adjustments between liner shipping and container handling industry on the global scale: divide et impera ?," Post-Print hal-02123048, HAL.
    7. Y. H. Venus Lun & Kee‐Hung Lai & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2008. "A Descriptive Framework for the Development and Operation of Liner Shipping Networks," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 439-457, August.
    8. Alexander M. Goulielmos, 2017. "“Containership Markets”: A Comparison with Bulk Shipping and a Proposed Oligopoly Model," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 67(2), pages 47-68, April-Jun.
    9. Ricardo J. Sanchez & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2011. "Liner Shipping Networks and Market Concentration," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Evangelos Kounoupas & Angeliki Pardali, 2015. "Adding some context to port marketing: Exploring the content and measurement of market orientation in the port industry," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 65(1-2), pages 3-26, january-m.
    11. Francesco Parola & Marcello Risitano & Ilaria Tutore & Marco Ferretti, 2014. "Analyzing maritime economy in Campania," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 68(2), pages 59-74, April-Jun.
    12. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    13. Wilmsmeier Gordon & Sánchez Ricardo J., 2010. "Evolution of shipping networks: Current challenges in emerging markets," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 54(1), pages 180-193, October.
    14. Yuan, Kebiao & Wang, Xuefeng, 2024. "Research on evolutionary game and stability of port cooperation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 97-109.
    15. Van de Voorde, Eddy E.M., 2005. "What Future the Maritime Sector: Some Considerations on Globalisation, Co-Operation and Market Power," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 253-277, January.
    16. Notteboom, Theo E. & Parola, Francesco & Satta, Giovanni & Pallis, Athanasios A., 2017. "The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 158-173.
    17. Cullinane, Kevin, 2004. "7. The Container Shipping Industry And The Impact Of China'S Accession To The Wto," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 221-245, January.
    18. Pérez, Ivone & González, María Manuela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2020. "Do specialisation and port size affect port efficiency? Evidence from cargo handling service in Spanish ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 234-249.
    19. Giulia Arduino & David G. Cardillo Murillo, 2010. "Dynamic role of actors in freight transport and logistics," Working Papers 10_5, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2010.
    20. Giulia Arduino & David G. Cardillo Murillo, 2010. "Dynamic role of actors in freight transport and logistics," Working Papers 1005, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2010.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:53:y:2014:i:4:p:499-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.