IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sit/wpaper/10_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dynamic role of actors in freight transport and logistics

Author

Listed:
  • Giulia Arduino

    (Dipartimento di Economia e Metodi Quantitativi, Università degli Studi di Genova)

  • David G. Cardillo Murillo

    (Institute for Economic Policy Research (IWW), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT))

Abstract

Over the last decades, international trade via sea has increased continuously and massively. As a consequence, shipments of commodities have expanded and changed: the volumes of cargo carried by the specialised bulk fleets have been gradually eroded by the growing competition of global container operators. It turns out that container stakeholders have attracted the majority of the cargo flows since they work together in various forms. This strategy is based on synergies, improving returns to scale and scope. The increasing trade of goods and the containerisation have generated new problems to solve for the global system of transportation. Not only maritime actors, but also ports have changed their role as nodes in a global network, allowing the interconnection between the foreland with the hinterland. Currently there are emerging association structures even in the hinterland transportation system. Indeed, demand of global transport is located in hinterlands turning this environment highly competitive. The historical development of strategic forms of collaborations has been observed at the maritime and port side. They emerged due to economic and logistics advantages. These advantages become more important whenever many modes, many actors and many network components provide similar services. Contrarily to the main stream in global trade, the transport and logistics chain of bananas seems to develop contrarily. These flows are still opposing to the main trend caused by the phenomenon of containerisation. However, also the association of actors has always being present in the banana trade. In this case, stakeholders are interested in still receiving the benefits of the banana trade. The main finding is that the market power is owned by the multi-nationals who continue to be integrated and control the whole supply chain. That is why the supply providers have started to collaborate and to associate also in different forms in order to grab a part of the market power located at the demand side. The reason is simple, there is a slight difference in prices and a simple cost calculation can be done for revealing the economic benefits and to show the market power of every actor involved. In order to investigate the role of actors in freight and transportation and its main dynamics, this paper has been divided into four sections. An overview of the collaboration forms in the shipping industry considering the main actors and their strategies been provided in section two. The third section is focused on the income that every actor involved in the banana cold chain receives, and a real case illustrates the costs for transporting a reefer container and a bulk reefer. Results show that a coordination of supply actors enforces competition between both ways for shipping reefer products. Finally, in section four some conclusions are drawn on the complete analysis, mainly concerning economic aspects of association structures among global actors

Suggested Citation

  • Giulia Arduino & David G. Cardillo Murillo, 2010. "Dynamic role of actors in freight transport and logistics," Working Papers 10_5, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2010.
  • Handle: RePEc:sit:wpaper:10_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sietitalia.org/wpsiet/Arduino_Carrillo_SIET_2010.pdf
    File Function: First version,
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masayuki Doi & Hiroshi Ohta & Hidekazu Itoh, 2000. "A Theoretical Analysis of Liner Shipping Conferences and Strategic Alliances," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 228-249, November.
    2. HEAVER, T. & MEERSMAN, Hilde & MOGLIA, F. & VAN DE VOORDE ,Eddy, "undated". "Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?," Working Papers 2000001, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    3. Brian Slack & Claude Comtois & Robert McCalla, 2002. "Strategic alliances in the container shipping industry: a global perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 65-76, January.
    4. T. Heaver & H. Meersman & F. Moglia & E. Van De Voorde, 2000. "Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 363-373.
    5. Heaver, T. & Meersman, H. & Moglia, F. & van de Voorde, E., 2000. "Do Mergers and Alliances Influence European Shipping and Port Competition?," Research Papers 24175, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economic Sciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad Ghorbani & Michele Acciaro & Sandra Transchel & Pierre Cariou, 2022. "Strategic alliances in container shipping: A review of the literature and future research agenda," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(2), pages 439-465, June.
    2. Cullinane, Kevin, 2004. "7. The Container Shipping Industry And The Impact Of China'S Accession To The Wto," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 221-245, January.
    3. Giulia Arduino & David G. Cardillo Murillo, 2010. "Dynamic role of actors in freight transport and logistics," Working Papers 1005, SIET Società Italiana di Economia dei Trasporti e della Logistica, revised 2010.
    4. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    5. Antoine Fremont & F Parola & Martin Soppe, 2007. "Vertical adjustments between liner shipping and container handling industry on the global scale: divide et impera ?," Post-Print hal-02123048, HAL.
    6. Van de Voorde, Eddy E.M., 2005. "What Future the Maritime Sector: Some Considerations on Globalisation, Co-Operation and Market Power," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 253-277, January.
    7. Y. H. Venus Lun & Kee‐Hung Lai & T. C. Edwin Cheng, 2008. "A Descriptive Framework for the Development and Operation of Liner Shipping Networks," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 439-457, August.
    8. Daniele Crotti & Claudio Ferrari & Alessio Tei, 2020. "Merger waves and alliance stability in container shipping," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 446-472, September.
    9. Pérez, Ivone & González, María Manuela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2020. "Do specialisation and port size affect port efficiency? Evidence from cargo handling service in Spanish ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 234-249.
    10. Panayides, Photis M. & Wiedmer, Robert, 2011. "Strategic alliances in container liner shipping," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 25-38.
    11. Dung-Ying Lin & Chien-Chih Huang & ManWo Ng, 2017. "The coopetition game in international liner shipping," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 474-495, May.
    12. Soppé, Martin & Parola, Francesco & Frémont, Antoine, 2009. "Emerging inter-industry partnerships between shipping lines and stevedores: from rivalry to cooperation?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 10-20.
    13. Marion Magnan & Martijn Horst, 2020. "Involvement of port authorities in inland logistics markets: the cases of Rotterdam, Le Havre and Marseille," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 102-123, March.
    14. Liu, Liming & Wang, Kelly Yujie & Yip, Tsz Leung, 2013. "Development of a container port system in Pearl River Delta: path to multi-gateway ports," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 30-38.
    15. Ricardo J. Sanchez & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2011. "Liner Shipping Networks and Market Concentration," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Notteboom, Theo, 2006. "Chapter 19 Concession Agreements as Port Governance Tools," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 437-455, January.
    17. Alexandrou, George & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Thomas, Hardy M., 2014. "Mergers and acquisitions in shipping," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 212-234.
    18. López-Bermúdez, Beatriz & Freire-Seoane, María Jesús & Pateiro-Rodríguez, Carlos, 2020. "Blue governance: Sustainable port governance," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 29(3), pages 1-17.
    19. Álvarez-SanJaime, Óscar & Cantos-Sánchez, Pedro & Moner-Colonques, Rafael & Sempere-Monerris, José J., 2013. "Competition and horizontal integration in maritime freight transport," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 67-81.
    20. Fung, Michael K. & Cheng, Leonard K. & Qiu, Larry D., 2003. "The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges: an empirical study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 703-716, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sit:wpaper:10_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Edoardo Marcucci (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/siettea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.