IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v34y2026i2p1872-1900.html

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Research: A Systematic Review of Recent Trends (2020–2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Jiyeon Kim
  • Wooyoung Yang

Abstract

The 2020–2024 period marks a pivotal era in sustainable development, characterized by significant regulatory developments, including the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the International Sustainability Standards Board standards, and the introduction of mandatory ESG reporting requirements worldwide. This review examines how recent policy changes have reshaped the linkages between ESG and sustainability. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we conducted a systematic review examining empirical studies of ESG–sustainability performance relationships published between 2020 and 2024. Studies examined the quantitative relationships between ESG sustainability performance and publicly traded corporations. Quality assessment employed the adapted Newcastle–Ottawa Scale with sustainability‐specific criteria. From 2847 screened records, 89 quantitative studies covering 126,000 firms in 67 countries met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 56% reported positive ESG–performance links, 38% mixed/neutral, and 6% negative. Asia‐Pacific showed the strongest positive share (67%), followed by multiregional (61%), Europe (56%), and North America (40%). Manufacturing (74%) and financial services (70%) outperformed technology (33%). This systematic review demonstrates strengthened positive associations and reveals Asia‐Pacific's emergence as a regional leader, providing timely evidence for environmental managers and policymakers navigating post‐2020 regulatory frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiyeon Kim & Wooyoung Yang, 2026. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Research: A Systematic Review of Recent Trends (2020–2024)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 1872-1900, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:1872-1900
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.70370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70370
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.70370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    2. Mi Sook Lee, 2024. "The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Korean companies: Moderated mediation effect of ESG score by industry," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2797-2810, June.
    3. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    4. Bisht, Nidhi S. & Mohebshahedin, Mahmood & Tripathy, Arun Kumar & Mahajan, Ashish & Gupta, Amit Kumar, 2025. "On the relevance of mandatory executive pay ratio disclosure: Evidence from India," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    5. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    6. Ali Alshehhi & Haitham Nobanee & Nilesh Khare, 2018. "The Impact of Sustainability Practices on Corporate Financial Performance: Literature Trends and Future Research Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-25, February.
    7. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alves, Rómulo & Krüger, Philipp & van Dijk, Mathijs, 2025. "Drawing up the bill: Are ESG ratings related to stock returns around the world?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Cini, Federico & Ferrari, Annalisa, 2025. "Towards the estimation of ESG ratings: A machine learning approach using balance sheet ratios," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PB).
    3. Drobetz, Wolfgang & El Ghoul, Sadok & Guedhami, Omrane & Hackmann, Jan P. & Momtaz, Paul P., 2024. "Entrepreneurial finance and sustainability: Do institutional investors impact the ESG performance of SMEs?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    4. Rabab Abouarab & Tapas Mishra & Simon Wolfe, 2025. "Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 811-839, April.
    5. Yiren Wang & Tianhao Zhi, 2025. "Sustainability Risks under Lotka-Volterra Dynamics," Papers 2509.04780, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    6. Staněk Gyönyör, Lucie & Horváth, Matúš & Stašek, Daniel & Stachoň, Martin, 2025. "The role of ESG factor in stock clustering based on risk-return-liquidity dimensions," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    7. Norocel Ioan-Iulian & Obreja Braşoveanu Laura, 2025. "Impact of ESG Ratings on Brown Sector Firms’ Financial Performance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 2936-2950.
    8. Wen, Limin & Li, Junxue & Sheng, Jiliang & Zhang, Yi, 2025. "Active portfolio management in the face of ESG uncertainty: An agile framework for adaptive investment strategies," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(PA).
    9. Zhuang, Pengtao & He, Qing & Ju, Wangjing & Xia, Qin, 2025. "How do firms react to ESG news-based sentiment? A corporate risk-taking perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Hye Lim Lee & Jin Ho Hwang & Do Yeol Ryu & Jong Woo Kim, 2025. "Open‐Source Data‐Driven Prediction of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Ratings Using Deep Learning Techniques," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), March.
    11. Gregor Dorfleitner & Rongxin Zhang, 2024. "ESG News Sentiment and Stock Price Reactions: A Comprehensive Investigation via BERT," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 197-244, June.
    12. Iulia Lupu & Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Gabriela tigu & Georgiana Cosoveanu & Radu Ion Filip, 2025. "ESG Reporting and Systemic Risk: Evidence from European Markets," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 869-869, August.
    13. Matthias Horn, 2023. "The Influence of ESG Ratings On Idiosyncratic Stock Risk: The Unrated, the Good, the Bad, and the Sinners," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 415-442, September.
    14. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    15. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    16. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    17. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    19. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2025. "Tech firms and the renewable energy sector: Exploring the moderating effects of institutional ownership on financial connectedness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju & Snehith Jacob Kodiyatt & P. P. Nithi Krishna & Geetha Sreelekshmi, 2023. "ESG sentiments and divergent ESG scores: suggesting a framework for ESG rating," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(12), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:34:y:2026:i:2:p:1872-1900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.