Author
Listed:
- Tirufat Dejene Woldeyes
- Moreno Muffatto
- Francesco Ferrati
Abstract
In the circular economy, companies design their business models to align with circular principles and explore pathways for sustainable value creation. However, research on the circular economy business model (CEBM) is in its infancy, and existing business models remain incomplete and lack comprehensiveness, failing to encompass all emerging business models, and lack explicit criteria and scientific procedures. Additionally, terminological inconsistencies persist, leading to ambiguity in defining circular strategies and their interconnections. In response to this challenge, our study conducted a rigorous review of 106 scholarly articles on circular business models. Our primary objective was to enhance the understanding of CEBMs with an in‐depth review of these models from literature and employ an integrated framework to craft our unique categorization of CEBMs by thoroughly exploring the research purposes, categorization models, and CEBM archetypes outlined in the existing body of literature. Our findings show that research within this field remains to be theoretical. First, the primary aim of studies focuses on developing conceptual frameworks and models, creating supporting tools and methods, and analyzing drivers, enablers, and challenges. Second, among the most referenced frameworks in literature are those developed by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation and Accenture, which serve as foundational tools for practitioners. Third, studies of CEBM concentrate on closing the resource loop of a product life cycle. Future research should prioritize overlooked circular strategies, propose robust classification models, and address gaps in product‐centric and resource‐efficient business practice.
Suggested Citation
Tirufat Dejene Woldeyes & Moreno Muffatto & Francesco Ferrati, 2025.
"Emerging Business Model Archetypes in the Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review,"
Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4428-4456, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:4428-4456
DOI: 10.1002/sd.3348
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:4428-4456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.