IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v16y2022i2p588-602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regime complexity and managing financial data streams: The orchestration of trade reporting for derivatives

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Quaglia
  • Aneta Spendzharova

Abstract

International regime complexity has become a prominent feature of the global economy and world politics. The international governance of derivatives markets is a notable case of this phenomenon in finance because a variety of post‐crisis rules have been issued by a multitude of international standard‐setting bodies. By combining the regime complexity and orchestration frameworks, we explain the precision and scope of international standards for derivatives trade reporting. We show how a collective orchestrator (the Group of Twenty) and a hub intermediary (the Financial Stability Board) managed regime complexity through the orchestration of the available intermediaries. We also seek to refine the orchestration framework by explaining how the mechanism of issue de‐linkage can be used to manage the partly diverging goals among states within the collective orchestrator. Our findings are relevant for the global regulation and governance of other policy areas characterized by a multiplicity of actors and interlinked issues, such as trade, energy, and environmental policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Quaglia & Aneta Spendzharova, 2022. "Regime complexity and managing financial data streams: The orchestration of trade reporting for derivatives," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 588-602, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:588-602
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12377
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Knaack, 2015. "Innovation and deadlock in global financial governance: transatlantic coordination failure in OTC derivatives regulation," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 1217-1248, December.
    2. Davis, Christina L., 2004. "International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(1), pages 153-169, February.
    3. Benjamin Cashore & Michael W. Stone, 2014. "Does California need Delaware? Explaining Indonesian, Chinese, and United States support for legality compliance of internationally traded products," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(1), pages 49-73, March.
    4. Pratt, Tyler, 2018. "Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 561-590, July.
    5. Thomas Gehring & Benjamin Faude, 2014. "A theory of emerging order within institutional complexes: How competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labor," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 471-498, December.
    6. Oscar Widerberg & Philipp Pattberg, 2017. "Accountability Challenges in the Transnational Regime Complex for Climate Change," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 34(1), pages 68-87, January.
    7. Quaglia, Lucia, 2014. "The European Union and Global Financial Regulation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199688241.
    8. Dirk De Bièvre & Arlo Poletti & Lars Thomann, 2014. "To enforce or not to enforce? Judicialization, venue shopping, and global regulatory harmonization," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(3), pages 269-286, September.
    9. James Buckley & David Howarth & Lucia Quaglia, 2012. "Internal Market: The Ongoing Struggle to ‘Protect’ Europe from Its Money Men," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50, pages 99-115, September.
    10. Urpelainen, Johannes & Van de Graaf, Thijs, 2015. "Your Place or Mine? Institutional Capture and the Creation of Overlapping International Institutions," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 799-827, October.
    11. Pratt, Tyler, 2018. "Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes—ERRATUM," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 761-762, July.
    12. Eugénia C. Heldt & Henning Schmidtke, 2019. "Explaining coherence in international regime complexes: How the World Bank shapes the field of multilateral development finance," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1160-1186, November.
    13. Abbott, Kenneth W. & Keohane, Robert O. & Moravcsik, Andrew & Slaughter, Anne-Marie & Snidal, Duncan, 2000. "The Concept of Legalization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 401-419, July.
    14. Brummer,Chris, 2015. "Soft Law and the Global Financial System," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107569447, October.
    15. Brummer,Chris, 2015. "Soft Law and the Global Financial System," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107128637, October.
    16. Johnson, Tana & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2012. "A Strategic Theory of Regime Integration and Separation," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 66(4), pages 645-677, October.
    17. Kenneth W. Abbott & Philipp Genschel & Duncan Snidal & Bernhard Zangl, 2020. "Competence versus control: The governor's dilemma," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 619-636, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matias E. Margulis, 2021. "Intervention by international organizations in regime complexes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 871-902, October.
    2. Susanne Lütz, 2021. "Global–Regional Realignments in Trade, Finance and Development: Introduction to the Special Issue," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 5-13, May.
    3. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    4. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni & Oliver Westerwinter, 2022. "The global governance complexity cube: Varieties of institutional complexity in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 233-262, April.
    5. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    6. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, 2022. "Ordering global governance complexes: The evolution of the governance complex for international civil aviation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 293-322, April.
    7. Faude, Benjamin, 2020. "International institutions in hard times: how institutional complexity increases resilience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108663, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Daniel Verdier, 2022. "Bargaining strategies for governance complex games," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 349-371, April.
    9. Karen J. Alter, 2022. "The promise and perils of theorizing international regime complexity in an evolving world," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 375-396, April.
    10. Justus Dreyling, 2021. "Institutional Complexity and Opportunity Structures: Weaker Actor Influence in International Intellectual Property Regulation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 37-46, May.
    11. Jho, Whasun & Kim, Youngwan, 2022. "Regime complexity and state competition over Global Internet Governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).
    12. Tan Celine, 2019. "Beyond the ‘Moments’ of Law and Development: Critical Reflections on Law and Development Scholarship in a Globalized Economy," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 285-321, June.
    13. Sunn Bush, Sarah & Cottiero, Christina & Prather, Lauren, 2024. "Zombies Ahead: Explaining the Rise of Low-Quality Election Monitoring," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt2fc2d3pr, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    14. Jorge Alberto Padilla Sánchez, 2019. "Crowdfunding. Análisis del marco regulatorio de la financiación colaborativa en Colombia," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1112, October.
    15. Kenneth W. Abbott & Benjamin Faude, 2022. "Hybrid institutional complexes in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 263-291, April.
    16. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Bernhard Reinsberg, 2017. "Trust Funds as a Lever of Influence at International Development Organizations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 85-95, August.
    17. Coban, Mehmet Kerem, 2019. "Compliance forces, domestic policy process, and international regulatory standards: Compliance with Basel III," OSF Preprints x32nw, Center for Open Science.
    18. Thierry Kirat & Frédéric Marty, 2015. "The regulatory practice of the French financial regulator, 2006-2011. From substantive to procedural financial regulation?," Post-Print hal-01276504, HAL.
    19. Eugenia Baroncelli, 2021. "Cooperating Through Competition: EU Challenge and Support to the World Bank Focality in Multilateral Development Finance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 80-89, May.
    20. Benjamin Faude, 2020. "Breaking Gridlock: How Path Dependent Layering Enhances Resilience in Global Trade Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(4), pages 448-457, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:588-602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.