IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v65y2018i8p619-637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the convergence of optimal actions for Markov decision processes and the optimality of (s, S) inventory policies

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene A. Feinberg
  • Mark E. Lewis

Abstract

This article studies convergence properties of optimal values and actions for discounted and average‐cost Markov decision processes (MDPs) with weakly continuous transition probabilities and applies these properties to the stochastic periodic‐review inventory control problem with backorders, positive setup costs, and convex holding/backordering costs. The following results are established for MDPs with possibly non‐compact action sets and unbounded cost functions: (i) convergence of value iterations to optimal values for discounted problems with possibly non‐zero terminal costs, (ii) convergence of optimal finite‐horizon actions to optimal infinite‐horizon actions for total discounted costs, as the time horizon tends to infinity, and (iii) convergence of optimal discount‐cost actions to optimal average‐cost actions for infinite‐horizon problems, as the discount factor tends to 1. Being applied to the setup‐cost inventory control problem, the general results on MDPs imply the optimality of (s, S) policies and convergence properties of optimal thresholds. In particular this article analyzes the setup‐cost inventory control problem without two assumptions often used in the literature: (a) the demand is either discrete or continuous or (b) the backordering cost is higher than the cost of backordered inventory if the amount of backordered inventory is large.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 65: 619–637, 2018

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene A. Feinberg & Mark E. Lewis, 2018. "On the convergence of optimal actions for Markov decision processes and the optimality of (s, S) inventory policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(8), pages 619-637, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:65:y:2018:i:8:p:619-637
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.21750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21750
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.21750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woonghee Tim Huh & Ganesh Janakiraman & Mahesh Nagarajan, 2011. "Average Cost Single-Stage Inventory Models: An Analysis Using a Vanishing Discount Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 143-155, February.
    2. Edward Zabel, 1962. "A Note on the Optimality of (S, s) Policies in Inventory Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 123-125, October.
    3. Eugene A. Feinberg & Pavlo O. Kasyanov & Nina V. Zadoianchuk, 2012. "Average Cost Markov Decision Processes with Weakly Continuous Transition Probabilities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(4), pages 591-607, November.
    4. D. Beyer & S. P. Sethi, 1999. "The Classical Average-Cost Inventory Models of Iglehart and Veinott–Wagner Revisited," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(3), pages 523-555, June.
    5. Eugene A. Feinberg & Mark E. Lewis, 2007. "Optimality Inequalities for Average Cost Markov Decision Processes and the Stochastic Cash Balance Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 769-783, November.
    6. Xin Chen & David Simchi-Levi, 2004. "Coordinating Inventory Control and Pricing Strategies with Random Demand and Fixed Ordering Cost: The Infinite Horizon Case," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-723, August.
    7. Arthur F. Veinott, Jr., 1966. "The Status of Mathematical Inventory Theory," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(11), pages 745-777, July.
    8. Dirk Beyer & Feng Cheng & Suresh P. Sethi & Michael Taksar, 2010. "Markovian Demand Inventory Models," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-0-387-71604-6, September.
    9. Xin Chen & David Simchi-Levi, 2004. "Coordinating Inventory Control and Pricing Strategies with Random Demand and Fixed Ordering Cost: The Finite Horizon Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 887-896, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shih-Hsien Tseng & Jia-Chen Yu, 2019. "Data-Driven Iron and Steel Inventory Control Policies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Tong Wang & Xiaoyue Yan & Chaolin Yang, 2021. "Managing a Hybrid RDC‐DC Inventory System," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3679-3697, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eugene A. Feinberg & Yan Liang, 2022. "Structure of optimal policies to periodic-review inventory models with convex costs and backorders for all values of discount factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 317(1), pages 29-45, October.
    2. Eugene A. Feinberg & Yan Liang, 2022. "On the optimality equation for average cost Markov decision processes and its validity for inventory control," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 317(2), pages 569-586, October.
    3. Sandun C. Perera & Suresh P. Sethi, 2023. "A survey of stochastic inventory models with fixed costs: Optimality of (s, S) and (s, S)‐type policies—Discrete‐time case," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(1), pages 131-153, January.
    4. Awi Federgruen & Zhe Liu & Lijian Lu, 2020. "Synthesis and Generalization of Structural Results in Inventory Management: A Generalized Convexity Property," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 547-575, May.
    5. Liu Shuren & Tang Pei, 2014. "The Stochastic Cash Balance Problem with Fixed Costs: The Risk-averse Case," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 2(6), pages 520-531, December.
    6. Gan, Xianghua & Sethi, Suresh P. & Xu, Liang, 2019. "Simultaneous Optimization of Contingent and Advance Purchase Orders with Fixed Ordering Costs," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 227-241.
    7. Woonghee Tim Huh & Ganesh Janakiraman & Mahesh Nagarajan, 2011. "Average Cost Single-Stage Inventory Models: An Analysis Using a Vanishing Discount Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 143-155, February.
    8. Wen Chen & Adam J. Fleischhacker & Michael N. Katehakis, 2015. "Dynamic pricing in a dual‐market environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(7), pages 531-549, October.
    9. Yonit Barron, 2022. "A probabilistic approach to the stochastic fluid cash management balance problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 607-645, May.
    10. Harun Avci & Kagan Gokbayrak & Emre Nadar, 2020. "Structural Results for Average‐Cost Inventory Models with Markov‐Modulated Demand and Partial Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 156-173, January.
    11. Hong-Qiao Chen & Xiao-Song Ding & Ji-Hong Zhang & Hua-Yi Li, 2020. "Optimal Production-Inventory Policy for a Periodic-Review Energy Buy-Back System over an Infinite Planning Horizon," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 37(02), pages 1-32, March.
    12. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2009. "Coordination of pricing and inventory control across products," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 175-190, March.
    13. Nan Yang & Renyu Zhang, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management in the presence of online reviews," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(8), pages 3180-3197, August.
    14. Gurkan, M. Edib & Tunc, Huseyin & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2022. "The joint stochastic lot sizing and pricing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Yu, Yimin & Shou, Biying & Ni, Yaodong & Chen, Li, 2017. "Optimal production, pricing, and substitution policies in continuous review production-inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 631-649.
    16. Oben Ceryan & Ozge Sahin & Izak Duenyas, 2013. "Dynamic Pricing of Substitutable Products in the Presence of Capacity Flexibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 86-101, April.
    17. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao & Cong Shi, 2021. "Nonparametric Learning Algorithms for Joint Pricing and Inventory Control with Lost Sales and Censored Demand," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 726-756, May.
    18. Li‐Ming Chen & Amar Sapra, 2013. "Joint inventory and pricing decisions for perishable products with two‐period lifetime," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(5), pages 343-366, August.
    19. Qing Li & Xiaoli Wu & Ki Ling Cheung, 2009. "Optimal Policies for Inventory Systems with Separate Delivery-Request and Order-Quantity Decisions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 626-636, June.
    20. Reza Maihami & Behrooz Karimi & Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Fatemi Ghomi, 2017. "Effect of two-echelon trade credit on pricing-inventory policy of non-instantaneous deteriorating products with probabilistic demand and deterioration functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 237-273, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:65:y:2018:i:8:p:619-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.