IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v54y2007i3p331-345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A produce‐to‐stock system with advance demand information and secondary customers

Author

Listed:
  • Seyed M.R. Iravani
  • Tieming Liu
  • K.L. Luangkesorn
  • David Simchi‐Levi

Abstract

We consider a manufacturer (i.e., a capacitated supplier) that produces to stock and has two classes of customers. The primary customer places orders at regular intervals of time for a random quantity, while the secondary customers request a single item at random times. At a predetermined time the manufacturer receives advance demand information regarding the order size of the primary customer. If the manufacturer is not able to fill the primary customer's demand, there is a penalty. On the other hand, serving the secondary customers results in additional profit; however, the manufacturer can refuse to serve the secondary customers in order to reserve inventory for the primary customer. We characterize the manufacturer's optimal production and stock reservation policies that maximize the manufacturer's discounted profit and the average profit per unit time. We show that these policies are threshold‐type policies, and these thresholds are monotone with respect to the primary customer's order size. Using a numerical study we provide insights into how the value of information is affected by the relative demand size of the primary and secondary customers. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2007

Suggested Citation

  • Seyed M.R. Iravani & Tieming Liu & K.L. Luangkesorn & David Simchi‐Levi, 2007. "A produce‐to‐stock system with advance demand information and secondary customers," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 331-345, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:54:y:2007:i:3:p:331-345
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boray Huang & Seyed M. R. Iravani, 2005. "Production Control Policies in Supply Chains with Selective-Information Sharing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 662-674, August.
    2. Guillermo Gallego & Garrett van Ryzin, 1994. "Optimal Dynamic Pricing of Inventories with Stochastic Demand over Finite Horizons," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(8), pages 999-1020, August.
    3. Yingdong Lu & Jing-Sheng Song & David D. Yao, 2003. "Order Fill Rate, Leadtime Variability, and Advance Demand Information in an Assemble-to-Order System," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(2), pages 292-308, April.
    4. Gabriel R. Bitran & Susana V. Mondschein, 1997. "Periodic Pricing of Seasonal Products in Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 64-79, January.
    5. Donald M. Topkis, 1968. "Optimal Ordering and Rationing Policies in a Nonstationary Dynamic Inventory Model with n Demand Classes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 160-176, November.
    6. Vinayak Deshpande & Morris A. Cohen & Karen Donohue, 2003. "A Threshold Inventory Rationing Policy for Service-Differentiated Demand Classes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 683-703, June.
    7. Özalp Özer, 2003. "Replenishment Strategies for Distribution Systems Under Advance Demand Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 255-272, March.
    8. Albert Y. Ha, 1997. "Inventory Rationing in a Make-to-Stock Production System with Several Demand Classes and Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(8), pages 1093-1103, August.
    9. Dellaert, N. P. & Melo, M. T., 2003. "Approximate solutions for a stochastic lot-sizing problem with partial customer-order information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 163-180, October.
    10. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2004. "Modeling the Benefits of Sharing Future Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 136-147, February.
    11. Srinagesh Gavirneni & Roman Kapuscinski & Sridhar Tayur, 1999. "Value of Information in Capacitated Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 16-24, January.
    12. David Simchi‐Levi & Yao Zhao, 2003. "The value of information sharing in a two‐stage supply chain with production capacity constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(8), pages 888-916, December.
    13. Guillermo Gallego & Özalp Özer, 2003. "Optimal Replenishment Policies for Multiechelon Inventory Problems Under Advance Demand Information," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(2), pages 157-175, February.
    14. Constantinos Maglaras & Joern Meissner, 2006. "Dynamic Pricing Strategies for Multiproduct Revenue Management Problems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 136-148, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tong Wang & Beril L. Toktay, 2008. "Inventory Management with Advance Demand Information and Flexible Delivery," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 716-732, April.
    2. Qing Ding & Panos Kouvelis & Joseph M. Milner, 2006. "Dynamic Pricing Through Discounts for Optimizing Multiple-Class Demand Fulfillment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(1), pages 169-183, February.
    3. Tan, Tarkan & Güllü, Refik & Erkip, Nesim, 2009. "Using imperfect advance demand information in ordering and rationing decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 665-677, October.
    4. ElHafsi, Mohsen & Camus, Herve & Craye, Etienne, 2010. "Managing an integrated production inventory system with information on the production and demand status and multiple non-unitary demand classes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 986-1001, December.
    5. Elhafsi, Mohsen & Hamouda, Essia, 2018. "Managing an integrated production and inventory system selling to a dual market: Long-term and walk-in," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 215-230.
    6. Jana Ralfs & Gudrun P. Kiesmüller, 2022. "Inventory management with advance demand information and flexible shipment consolidation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1009-1044, December.
    7. Felix Papier & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2010. "Capacity Rationing in Stochastic Rental Systems with Advance Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 274-288, April.
    8. Jean-Philippe Gayon & Saif Benjaafar & Francis de Véricourt, 2009. "Using Imperfect Advance Demand Information in Production-Inventory Systems with Multiple Customer Classes," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 128-143, July.
    9. Liberopoulos, George, 2008. "On the tradeoff between optimal order-base-stock levels and demand lead-times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(1), pages 136-155, October.
    10. Yiwei Chen & Vivek F. Farias, 2013. "Simple Policies for Dynamic Pricing with Imperfect Forecasts," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 612-624, June.
    11. Saif Benjaafar & Mohsen ElHafsi & Tingliang Huang, 2010. "Optimal control of a production‐inventory system with both backorders and lost sales," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 57(3), pages 252-265, April.
    12. van Jaarsveld, W.L. & Dekker, R., 2009. "Finding optimal policies in the (S - 1, S ) lost sales inventory model with multiple demand classes," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-14, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    13. Bing Lin & Shaoxiang Chen & Yi Feng & Jianjun Xu, 2018. "The Joint Stock and Capacity Rationings of a Make-To-Stock System with Flexible Demand," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(01), pages 1-27, February.
    14. Pavithra Harsha & Shivaram Subramanian & Joline Uichanco, 2019. "Dynamic Pricing of Omnichannel Inventories," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 47-65, January.
    15. Robert A. Shumsky & Fuqiang Zhang, 2009. "Dynamic Capacity Management with Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(3), pages 671-684, June.
    16. Christoph Rippe & Gudrun P. Kiesmüller, 2023. "The added value of advance demand information for the planning of a repair kit," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 311-335, March.
    17. Chen-Ritzo, Ching-Hua & Ervolina, Tom & Harrison, Terry P. & Gupta, Barun, 2011. "Component rationing for available-to-promise scheduling in configure-to-order systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 57-65, May.
    18. ElHafsi, Mohsen & Fang, Jianxin & Hamouda, Essia, 2021. "Optimal production and inventory control of multi-class mixed backorder and lost sales demand class models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 147-161.
    19. Dasu, Sriram & Tong, Chunyang, 2010. "Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: Analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 662-671, August.
    20. Peter Seele & Claus Dierksmeier & Reto Hofstetter & Mario D. Schultz, 2021. "Mapping the Ethicality of Algorithmic Pricing: A Review of Dynamic and Personalized Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 697-719, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:54:y:2007:i:3:p:331-345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.