IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v52y2005i5p469-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximating nondominated sets in continuous multiobjective optimization problems

Author

Listed:
  • Jacinto Martín
  • Concha Bielza
  • David Ríos Insua

Abstract

Many important problems in Operations Research and Statistics require the computation of nondominated (or Pareto or efficient) sets. This task may be currently undertaken efficiently for discrete sets of alternatives or for continuous sets under special and fairly tight structural conditions. Under more general continuous settings, parametric characterisations of the nondominated set, for example through convex combinations of the objective functions or ε‐constrained problems, or discretizations‐based approaches, pose several problems. In this paper, the lack of a general approach to approximate the nondominated set in continuous multiobjective problems is addressed. Our simulation‐based procedure only requires to sample from the set of alternatives and check whether an alternative dominates another. Stopping rules, efficient sampling schemes, and procedures to check for dominance are proposed. A continuous approximation to the nondominated set is obtained by fitting a surface through the points of a discrete approximation, using a local (robust) regression method. Other actions like clustering and projecting points onto the frontier are required in nonconvex feasible regions and nonconnected Pareto sets. In a sense, our method may be seen as an evolutionary algorithm with a variable population size. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacinto Martín & Concha Bielza & David Ríos Insua, 2005. "Approximating nondominated sets in continuous multiobjective optimization problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(5), pages 469-480, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:52:y:2005:i:5:p:469-480
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20090
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20090?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dauer, Jerald P. & Liu, Yi-Hsin, 1990. "Solving multiple objective linear programs in objective space," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 350-357, June.
    2. White, D. J., 1988. "Weighting factor extensions for finite multiple objective vector minimization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 256-265, August.
    3. Sarker, Ruhul & Liang, Ko-Hsin & Newton, Charles, 2002. "A new multiobjective evolutionary algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 12-23, July.
    4. Dauer, J. P. & Saleh, O. A., 1990. "Constructing the set of efficient objective values in multiple objective linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 358-365, June.
    5. Insua, David Rios & French, Simon, 1991. "A framework for sensitivity analysis in discrete multi-objective decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 176-190, September.
    6. Harold P. Benson & Serpil Sayin, 1997. "Towards finding global representations of the efficient set in multiple objective mathematical programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 47-67, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen, Trung H. & Granger, Julien & Pandya, Deval & Paustian, Keith, 2019. "High-resolution multi-objective optimization of feedstock landscape design for hybrid first and second generation biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1484-1496.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Fülöp & L. D. Muu, 2000. "Branch-and-Bound Variant of an Outcome-Based Algorithm for Optimizing over the Efficient Set of a Bicriteria Linear Programming Problem," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 37-54, April.
    2. Harold P. Benson & Serpil Sayin, 1997. "Towards finding global representations of the efficient set in multiple objective mathematical programming," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 47-67, February.
    3. H. P. Benson, 1998. "Hybrid Approach for Solving Multiple-Objective Linear Programs in Outcome Space," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 17-35, July.
    4. Benson, Harold P. & Sun, Erjiang, 2002. "A weight set decomposition algorithm for finding all efficient extreme points in the outcome set of a multiple objective linear program," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 26-41, May.
    5. Dauer, Jerald P. & Gallagher, Richard J., 1996. "A combined constraint-space, objective-space approach for determining high-dimensional maximal efficient faces of multiple objective linear programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 368-381, January.
    6. Podinovski, Vladislav V., 2013. "Non-dominance and potential optimality for partial preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 482-486.
    7. Mustajoki, Jyri & Hamalainen, Raimo P. & Lindstedt, Mats R.K., 2006. "Using intervals for global sensitivity and worst-case analyses in multiattribute value trees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 278-292, October.
    8. McKenna, R. & Bertsch, V. & Mainzer, K. & Fichtner, W., 2018. "Combining local preferences with multi-criteria decision analysis and linear optimization to develop feasible energy concepts in small communities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(3), pages 1092-1110.
    9. Podinovski, Vladislav V., 2020. "Maximum likelihood solutions for multicriterial choice problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(1), pages 299-308.
    10. Chen, Ye & Marc Kilgour, D. & Hipel, Keith W., 2008. "A case-based distance method for screening in multiple-criteria decision aid," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 373-383, June.
    11. Stephen P. Chambal & Jeffery D. Weir & Yucel R. Kahraman & Alex J. Gutman, 2011. "A Practical Procedure for Customizable One-Way Sensitivity Analysis in Additive Value Models," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 303-321, December.
    12. H. P. Benson & E. Sun, 2000. "Outcome Space Partition of the Weight Set in Multiobjective Linear Programming," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(1), pages 17-36, April.
    13. Valentin Bertsch & Wolf Fichtner, 2016. "A participatory multi-criteria approach for power generation and transmission planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 177-207, October.
    14. Salo, Ahti A., 1995. "Interactive decision aiding for group decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 134-149, July.
    15. Quan, Gang & Greenwood, Garrison W. & Liu, Donglin & Hu, Sharon, 2007. "Searching for multiobjective preventive maintenance schedules: Combining preferences with evolutionary algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1969-1984, March.
    16. Wulf, David & Bertsch, Valentin, 2016. "A natural language generation approach to support understanding and traceability of multi-dimensional preferential sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making," MPRA Paper 75025, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Brian Dandurand & Margaret M. Wiecek, 2016. "Quadratic scalarization for decomposed multiobjective optimization," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(4), pages 1071-1096, October.
    18. Luis Dias & João Clímaco, 2000. "ELECTRE TRI for Groups with Imprecise Information on Parameter Values," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 355-377, September.
    19. Galinina Anna & Burceva Olga & Parshutin Sergei, 2012. "The Optimization of COCOMO Model Coefficients Using Genetic Algorithms," Information Technology and Management Science, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 45-51, December.
    20. Liesio, Juuso & Mild, Pekka & Salo, Ahti, 2007. "Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1488-1505, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:52:y:2005:i:5:p:469-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.