IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v45y1998i4p423-433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note: The economic manufacturing lot‐sizing problem with imperfect production processes: Bounds and optimal solutions

Author

Listed:
  • M. Hariga
  • M. Ben‐Daya

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the economic production quantity problem in the presence of imperfect processes. In the literature, the time to shift from the in‐control state to the out‐of‐control state is assumed to be exponentially distributed. In this study, we consider general time to shift distributions and provide distribution‐based and distribution‐free bounds on the optimal cost. For the exponential case, we compare the optimal solutions to approximate solutions proposed in the literature. A numerical example is used to illustrate the analysis presented and to conduct a sensitivity analysis in order to see the effect of the input parameters on the various solutions to the problem. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 45: 423–433, 1998

Suggested Citation

  • M. Hariga & M. Ben‐Daya, 1998. "Note: The economic manufacturing lot‐sizing problem with imperfect production processes: Bounds and optimal solutions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(4), pages 423-433, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:45:y:1998:i:4:p:423-433
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199806)45:43.0.CO;2-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199806)45:43.0.CO;2-7
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199806)45:43.0.CO;2-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hau L. Lee & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 1987. "Simultaneous Determination of Production Cycle and Inspection Schedules in a Production System," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1125-1136, September.
    2. Evan L. Porteus, 1986. "Optimal Lot Sizing, Process Quality Improvement and Setup Cost Reduction," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-144, February.
    3. Peter Kelle & Edward A. Silver & Glen F. Murphy, 1994. "Cost analysis and extension of a simple maintenance‐scheduling heuristic," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(7), pages 945-958, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. B.C. Giri & I. Moon & W.Y. Yun, 2003. "Scheduling economic lot sizes in deteriorating production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(6), pages 650-661, September.
    2. Om Prakash & A.R. Roy & A. Goswami, 2014. "Stochastic manufacturing system with process deterioration and machine breakdown," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 2539-2551, December.
    3. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsu, Jia-Tzer & Hsu, Lie-Fern, 2013. "An EOQ model with imperfect quality items, inspection errors, shortage backordering, and sales returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 162-170.
    2. Sher, Mikhail M. & Kim, Seung-Lae & Banerjee, Avijit & Paz, Michael T., 2018. "A supply chain coordination mechanism for common items subject to failure in the electronics, defense, and medical industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 164-173.
    3. Tien-Yu Lin & Kuo-Lung Hou, 2015. "An imperfect quality economic order quantity with advanced receiving," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 23(2), pages 535-551, July.
    4. B. C. Giri & T Chakraborty, 2007. "Optimal production, maintenance, and warranty strategies for item sold with rebate combination warranty," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 221(4), pages 257-264, December.
    5. Chih‐Hsiung Wang, 2006. "Optimal production and maintenance policy for imperfect production systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 151-156, March.
    6. Yoo, Seung Ho & Kim, DaeSoo & Park, Myung-Sub, 2009. "Economic production quantity model with imperfect-quality items, two-way imperfect inspection and sales return," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 255-265, September.
    7. B C Giri & T Dohi, 2005. "Exact formulation of stochastic EMQ model for an unreliable production system," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(5), pages 563-575, May.
    8. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Nahas, Nabil & Ben-Daya, Mohamed, 2016. "Integrated preventive maintenance and production decisions for imperfect processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 21-31.
    9. Salameh, M. K. & Jaber, M. Y., 2000. "Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(1-3), pages 59-64, March.
    10. Tang, Kwei & Gong, Linguo & Chang, Dong-Shang, 2003. "Optimal process control policies under a time-varying cost structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 197-210, August.
    11. Chakraborty, Tulika & Giri, B.C. & Chaudhuri, K.S., 2008. "Production lot sizing with process deterioration and machine breakdown," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(2), pages 606-618, March.
    12. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    13. Harun Öztürk, 2019. "Modeling an inventory problem with random supply, inspection and machine breakdown," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(2), pages 497-527, June.
    14. Oshmita Dey, 2019. "A fuzzy random integrated inventory model with imperfect production under optimal vendor investment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 101-115, March.
    15. Om Prakash & A.R. Roy & A. Goswami, 2014. "Stochastic manufacturing system with process deterioration and machine breakdown," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 2539-2551, December.
    16. Shoshana Anily & Avraham Beja & Amit Mendel, 2002. "Optimal Lot Sizes with Geometric Production Yield and Rigid Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 424-432, June.
    17. Bouslah, Bassem & Gharbi, Ali & Pellerin, Robert, 2013. "Joint optimal lot sizing and production control policy in an unreliable and imperfect manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 143-156.
    18. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Lee, Zong-Zhe, 2005. "Joint determination of production run length and number of standbys in a deteriorating production process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 359-371, April.
    19. W. C. Tsai & Neng-Hui Shih & Chih-Hsiung Wang, 2018. "The effects of inspection delay and restoration cost on the optimal inspection and production policy," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 55(1), pages 187-195, March.
    20. Khan, Mehmood & Jaber, Mohamad Y. & Bonney, Maurice, 2011. "An economic order quantity (EOQ) for items with imperfect quality and inspection errors," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 113-118, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:45:y:1998:i:4:p:423-433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.