IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v39y1992i1p79-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of an integrated supplier‐buyer quality‐control system

Author

Listed:
  • Michael H. Peters
  • Timothy S. Vaughan

Abstract

In this article, a quality‐control design framework that employs information for the supplier‐buyer system is modeled. Significant operational savings may be obtained by using the integrated plans developed under this framework. This is especially true when the cost of a defective is high, and the variable sampling and rework costs are low. Analysis of the interaction of defective, rework, and variable sampling costs reveals that the savings are the result of a shift of control effort from the process‐control to the lot‐acceptance stage, which is the consequence of tradeoffs involving both stages. The managerial impact of adopting integrated plans is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael H. Peters & Timothy S. Vaughan, 1992. "Evaluation of an integrated supplier‐buyer quality‐control system," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 79-96, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:39:y:1992:i:1:p:79-96
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(199202)39:13.0.CO;2-V
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(199202)39:13.0.CO;2-V
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(199202)39:13.0.CO;2-V?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James P. Monahan, 1984. "A Quantity Discount Pricing Model to Increase Vendor Profits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 720-726, June.
    2. Herbert Moskowitz & William L. Berry, 1976. "A Bayesian Algorithm for Determining Optimal Single Sample Acceptance Plans for Product Attributes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(11), pages 1238-1250, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy S. Vaughan, 1994. "The applicability of acceptance sampling with respect to process stability and control," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(5), pages 635-651, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yingxiao Li & Jianheng Zhou, 2022. "Sustainable Supplier’s Equilibrium Discount Strategy under Random Demand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Mutlu, Fatih & Çetinkaya, Sıla, 2020. "Supplier–carrier–buyer channels: Contractual pricing for a carrier serving a supplier–buyer partnership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Tsai, Jung-Fa, 2007. "An optimization approach for supply chain management models with quantity discount policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 982-994, March.
    4. Jiafu Tang & Kai-Leung Yung & Iko Kaku & Jianbo Yang, 2008. "The scheduling of deliveries in a production-distribution system with multiple buyers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 161(1), pages 5-23, July.
    5. Cai, Gangshu (George) & Chiang, Wen-Chyuan & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2011. "Game theoretic pricing and ordering decisions with partial lost sales in two-stage supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 175-185, April.
    6. Albert Y. Ha & Lode Li & Shu-Ming Ng, 2003. "Price and Delivery Logistics Competition in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(9), pages 1139-1153, September.
    7. Charles L. Munson & Jianli Hu & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 2003. "Teaching the Costs of Uncoordinated Supply Chains," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 24-39, June.
    8. Lie‐Fern Hsu & Charles S. Tapiero, 1988. "A bayes approach to quality control of an M/G/1 queue," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(3), pages 327-343, June.
    9. Zhou, Yong-Wu & Min, Jie & Goyal, Suresh K., 2008. "Supply-chain coordination under an inventory-level-dependent demand rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 518-527, June.
    10. Kevin Weng, Z., 1995. "Modeling quantity discounts under general price-sensitive demand functions: Optimal policies and relationships," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 300-314, October.
    11. Ito, Tadashi, 2012. "Revisiting the determinants of unit values," IDE Discussion Papers 356, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    12. Duan, Lisha & Ventura, José A., 2019. "A Dynamic Supplier Selection and Inventory Management Model for a Serial Supply Chain with a Novel Supplier Price Break Scheme and Flexible Time Periods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 979-998.
    13. Aharon Ben-Tal & Boaz Golany & Arkadi Nemirovski & Jean-Philippe Vial, 2005. "Retailer-Supplier Flexible Commitments Contracts: A Robust Optimization Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 248-271, February.
    14. Qiu, Xuan & Lee, Chung-Yee, 2019. "Quantity discount pricing for rail transport in a dry port system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 563-580.
    15. Gansterer, Margaretha & Födermayr, Patrick & Hartl, Richard F., 2021. "The capacitated multi-level lot-sizing problem with distributed agents," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    16. Chan, Chi Kin & Lee, Y.C.E. & Campbell, J.F., 2013. "Environmental performance—Impacts of vendor–buyer coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 683-695.
    17. Kim, Seung-Lae & Ha, Daesung, 2003. "A JIT lot-splitting model for supply chain management: Enhancing buyer-supplier linkage," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 1-10, October.
    18. Romeijn, H.E. & van den Heuvel, W.J. & Geunes, J., 2012. "Mitigating the Cost of Anarchy in Supply Chain Systems," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2012-03, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    19. Charles J. Corbett, 2001. "Stochastic Inventory Systems in a Supply Chain with Asymmetric Information: Cycle Stocks, Safety Stocks, and Consignment Stock," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 487-500, August.
    20. Shi Chen & Hau Lee, 2017. "Incentive Alignment and Coordination of Project Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 1011-1025, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:39:y:1992:i:1:p:79-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.