IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i19-20p3822-3834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information concerning ICU patients’ families in the handover—The clinicians’ «game of whispers»: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Mette Nygaard
  • Hege Selnes Haugdahl
  • Berit Støre Brinchmann
  • Ranveig Lind

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore how information concerning ICU patients´ families is included in the ICU clinicians’ daily handover. Background Handover refers to the transfer of information and care responsibility between clinicians. An effective and precise handover are of great importance to ensure quality of care. Although improvements in handovers have received increasing attention in recent decades, little is known about how information about ICU patients’ family members is included in handovers. Design A qualitative study using Charmaz’ constructivist grounded theory approach. Methods Data were gathered through participant observation, focus groups, dyadic and individual interviews of physicians and nurses from four ICUs in different Norwegian hospitals. The data consist of 270 observation hours, seven focus groups, three dyadic interviews and two individual interviews. Field notes and transcribed interview data were analysed using constructivist grounded theory approach. COREQ checklist was applied as reporting guideline for this study. Findings “A game of whispers” emerged as the core category, representing missing information about the patient's family during the handover. Together with three subcategories: “documentation dilemmas,” “being updated” and “talking together,” the core category explains how transfer of family‐related information between clinicians is continually processed and resolved. Conclusions This study indicates challenges related to appropriate and high‐quality handover concerning ICU patients´ families. Oral handovers are essential in terms of clinicians’ need to elaborate on written information and update each other. However, oral transmission involves a high risk of information loss during the handover. Written documentation about the family seems to be inadequate and poorly structured. Relevance to clinical practice The study findings suggest a need for increased awareness in practice and research of the importance of transferring appropriate and reliable information about patients’ families between ICU clinicians. User‐friendly handover tools and patient records that include information on patients’ family members should be developed.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Mette Nygaard & Hege Selnes Haugdahl & Berit Støre Brinchmann & Ranveig Lind, 2020. "Information concerning ICU patients’ families in the handover—The clinicians’ «game of whispers»: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3822-3834, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3822-3834
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15414
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15414?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronny Enger & Birgitta Andershed, 2018. "Nurses’ experience of the transfer of ICU patients to general wards: A great responsibility and a huge challenge," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 186-194, January.
    2. Julius Sim & Jackie Waterfield, 2019. "Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 3003-3022, November.
    3. Hege S Haugdahl & Regina Eide & Ingeborg Alexandersen & Tove Engan Paulsby & Berit Stjern & Stine Borgen Lund & Gørill Haugan, 2018. "From breaking point to breakthrough during the ICU stay: A qualitative study of family members’ experiences of long‐term intensive care patients’ pathways towards survival," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3630-3640, October.
    4. Gro Frivold & Åshild Slettebø & Bjørg Dale, 2016. "Family members’ lived experiences of everyday life after intensive care treatment of a loved one: a phenomenological hermeneutical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 392-402, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonas Karlsson & Thomas Eriksson & Berit Lindahl & Isabell Fridh, 2020. "Family members' lived experiences when a loved one undergoes an interhospital intensive care unit‐to‐unit transfer: A phenomenological hermeneutical study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3721-3730, October.
    2. Xi Chen & Jingjing Su & Daniel Thomas Bressington & Yan Li & Sau Fong Leung, 2022. "Perspectives of Nursing Students towards Schizophrenia Stigma: A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Ingeborg Alexandersen & Berit Stjern & Regina Eide & Hege Selnes Haugdahl & Tove Engan Paulsby & Stine Borgen Lund & Gørill Haugan, 2019. "“Never in my mind to give up!” A qualitative study of long‐term intensive care patients’ inner strength and willpower—Promoting and challenging aspects," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3991-4003, November.
    4. Bhana, Deevia & Janak, Raksha & Pillay, Daisy & Ramrathan, Labby, 2021. "Masculinity and violence: Gender, poverty and culture in a rural primary school in South Africa," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Ingeborg Alexandersen & Hege S. Haugdahl & Tove Engan Paulsby & Stine Borgen Lund & Berit Stjern & Regina Eide & Gørill Haugan, 2021. "A qualitative study of long‐term ICU patients' inner strength and willpower: Family and health professionals as a health‐promoting resource," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 161-173, January.
    6. Xiuzhu Gu & Kenji Itoh, 2021. "Organizational climate for safe and effective inter‐unit handoffs in Japanese hospitals," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1153-1165, July.
    7. Alfonso D. Gajardo Sánchez & Luis R. Murillo-Zamorano & Joséà ngel López-Sánchez & Carmen Bueno-Muñoz, 2023. "Gamification in Health Care Management: Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    8. Kurtz LAW & Toru TAKAHASHI & Cristian VLAD & Kyoko KOKUSHO & Saddam IQBAL, 2021. "Gauging The Reactions To Remote Working At Ibm Japan During The Period Of Covid-19," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(5), pages 168-181, October.
    9. Gunilla Hollman Frisman & Ingrid Wåhlin & Lotti Orvelius & Susanna Ågren, 2018. "Health‐promoting conversations—A novel approach to families experiencing critical illness in the ICU environment," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 631-639, February.
    10. Anna Nivestam & Maria Haak & Albert Westergren & Pia Petersson, 2021. "Give Older Persons a Voice in the Society—By Using Information Compiled during Preventive Home Visits on a Societal Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Bernard Barasa & Cosmas Walyaula Watsusi & Paul Makoba Gudoyi & Noah Lutaaya & Loy Turyabanawe Gumisiriza & John Paul Magaya, 2023. "Desert Locust Invasion in Uganda: Effects on Household Food Consumption and Effective Control Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    12. Giuseppe Di Vita & Daniela Spina & Rachele De Cianni & Roberto Carbone & Mario D’Amico & Raffaele Zanchini, 2023. "Enhancing the extended value chain of the aromatic plant sector in Italy: a multiple correspondence analysis based on stakeholders’ opinions," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:19-20:p:3822-3834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.