IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/bemann/v11y2021i5p168-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gauging The Reactions To Remote Working At Ibm Japan During The Period Of Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • Kurtz LAW

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Toru TAKAHASHI

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Cristian VLAD

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Kyoko KOKUSHO

    (IBM Japan, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Saddam IQBAL

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

The Japanese corporate mindset often tends towards a more conservative stance compared to that of the West. However, Japan has the most companies with a continuous operation history of over 200 years, having survived many turbulent times including pandemics and war. How then, might companies of today learn from Japanese success cases? Sustainability and longevity are commonly based on the successes born from past corporate history, but with the COVID-19 pandemic, severe internal effects, and economic impacts suggests a need for an agility that most Japanese companies are not familiar with. This research utilizes modified unstructured focus groups to investigate IBM Japan’s employees’ perceptions of remote working at the during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurtz LAW & Toru TAKAHASHI & Cristian VLAD & Kyoko KOKUSHO & Saddam IQBAL, 2021. "Gauging The Reactions To Remote Working At Ibm Japan During The Period Of Covid-19," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(5), pages 168-181, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:168-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://beman.ase.ro/special_issue_2/13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julius Sim & Jackie Waterfield, 2019. "Focus group methodology: some ethical challenges," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(6), pages 3003-3022, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kurtz LAW & Jacqueline MUJAYA & Saddam IQBAL & Takatomo ITOI & Keita SUGIYAMA, 2022. "Investigating Occupational-Stress for Workers in Financial Institutions; a Reclassification of Work Stigma through Japanese and Western Values," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(2), pages 302-313, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xi Chen & Jingjing Su & Daniel Thomas Bressington & Yan Li & Sau Fong Leung, 2022. "Perspectives of Nursing Students towards Schizophrenia Stigma: A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Bhana, Deevia & Janak, Raksha & Pillay, Daisy & Ramrathan, Labby, 2021. "Masculinity and violence: Gender, poverty and culture in a rural primary school in South Africa," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Alfonso D. Gajardo Sánchez & Luis R. Murillo-Zamorano & Joséà ngel López-Sánchez & Carmen Bueno-Muñoz, 2023. "Gamification in Health Care Management: Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    4. Anne Mette Nygaard & Hege Selnes Haugdahl & Berit Støre Brinchmann & Ranveig Lind, 2020. "Information concerning ICU patients’ families in the handover—The clinicians’ «game of whispers»: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3822-3834, October.
    5. Anna Nivestam & Maria Haak & Albert Westergren & Pia Petersson, 2021. "Give Older Persons a Voice in the Society—By Using Information Compiled during Preventive Home Visits on a Societal Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Bernard Barasa & Cosmas Walyaula Watsusi & Paul Makoba Gudoyi & Noah Lutaaya & Loy Turyabanawe Gumisiriza & John Paul Magaya, 2023. "Desert Locust Invasion in Uganda: Effects on Household Food Consumption and Effective Control Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Giuseppe Di Vita & Daniela Spina & Rachele De Cianni & Roberto Carbone & Mario D’Amico & Raffaele Zanchini, 2023. "Enhancing the extended value chain of the aromatic plant sector in Italy: a multiple correspondence analysis based on stakeholders’ opinions," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:bemann:v:11:y:2021:i:5:p:168-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zamfir Andreea (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.