IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v25y2016i5-6p715-724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aspects of nursing student placements associated with perceived likelihood of working in residential aged care

Author

Listed:
  • Emma Lea
  • Ron Mason
  • Claire Eccleston
  • Andrew Robinson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To investigate which aspects of student nurses' experiences of residential aged care facility clinical placements affect perceived likelihood of choosing a career in residential aged care post graduation. Background Poor clinical placement experiences as a student contribute to nurses' reluctance to work in aged care. Various factors have been found to improve the placement experience and influence students' attitudes and employment intentions. Missing from the literature is a quantitative – rather than qualitative – exploration of which attributes of an aged care placement link to perceived likelihood of working in residential aged care post graduation. Design Supported residential aged care placement programmes were developed for nursing students using an evidence‐based best‐practice model within an action research framework. Staff formed a mentor group in two facilities. During placement, weekly feedback meetings were held for students and mentors. Methods Second‐year nursing students (n = 71) participating in a three‐ or four‐week placement programme at two Tasmanian residential aged care facilities (September 2011–May 2013) completed questionnaires on placement experiences. Measures of association (correlation coefficients) were used to assess the effect of a range of variables on the likelihood of working in an aged care facility post graduation. Results Associations were identified between the likelihood of working in residential aged care post graduation and nurse mentor–student feedback exchange, Teaching and Learning Score and supportiveness of care workers. Conclusions This study adds to the literature by providing quantitative evidence that certain aspects of aged care placements influence attitudes to working in these sites post graduation. Relevance to clinical practice To increase interest in working in residential aged care, the teaching and learning environment needs improvement, opportunities should be proffered for mentor–student feedback exchange during placements and care workers need support to mentor effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma Lea & Ron Mason & Claire Eccleston & Andrew Robinson, 2016. "Aspects of nursing student placements associated with perceived likelihood of working in residential aged care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(5-6), pages 715-724, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:715-724
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurie Grealish & Kasia Bail & Kristen Ranse, 2010. "‘Investing in the future’: residential aged care staff experiences of working with nursing students in a ‘community of practice’," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(15‐16), pages 2291-2299, August.
    2. Amanda Henderson & Debra K Creedy & Marie Cooke & Rachel Walker, 2010. "Modification of a student feedback tool that provides feedback to staff in clinical contexts," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(19‐20), pages 2936-2938, October.
    3. Commission, Productivity, 2011. "Caring for older Australians," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emma J Lea & Sharon Andrews & Megan Stronach & Annette Marlow & Andrew L Robinson, 2017. "Using action research to build mentor capacity to improve orientation and quality of nursing students’ aged care placements: what to do when the phone rings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1893-1905, July.
    2. Emma Lea & Annette Marlow & Erika Altmann & Helen Courtney‐Pratt, 2018. "Nursing students’ preferences for clinical placements in the residential aged care setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 143-152, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Necmi Avkiran & Alan McCrystal, 2014. "Intertemporal analysis of organizational productivity in residential aged care networks: scenario analyses for setting policy targets," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 113-125, June.
    2. Nguyen, Ha Trong & Connelly, Luke Brian, 2014. "The effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: Results from a multinomial endogenous treatment model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 115-122.
    3. Burgess, Teresa & Braunack-Mayer, Annette & Crawford, Gregory B. & Beilby, Justin, 2014. "Australian health policy and end of life care for people with chronic disease: An analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 60-67.
    4. Lindy King & Ann Harrington & Ecushla Linedale & Elizabeth Tanner, 2018. "A mixed methods thematic review: Health‐related decision‐making by the older person," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(7-8), pages 1327-1343, April.
    5. Travers, Max & Liu, Edgar & Cook, Peta & Osborne, Caroline & Jacobs, Keith & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Dwyer, Zack, 2022. "Business models, consumer experiences and regulation of retirement villages," SocArXiv mb2vp, Center for Open Science.
    6. Kate M. Gunn & Julie Luker & Rama Ramanathan & Xiomara Skrabal Ross & Amanda Hutchinson & Elisabeth Huynh & Ian Olver, 2021. "Choosing and Managing Aged Care Services from Afar: What Matters to Australian Long-Distance Care Givers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Alice Tran & Kim-Huong Nguyen & Len Gray & Tracy Comans, 2019. "A Systematic Literature Review of Efficiency Measurement in Nursing Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Margaret Adams & Glenn Gardner & Patsy Yates, 2017. "Investigating nurse practitioners in the private sector: a theoretically informed research protocol," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(11-12), pages 1608-1620, June.
    9. Genevieve Knight & Zhang Wei, 2015. "Isolating the Determinants of Temporary Agency Worker Use by Firms: An Analysis of Temporary Agency Workers in Australian Aged Care," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 18(2), pages 205-237.
    10. Prosser, Brenton & Davey, Rachel & Gibson, Diane, 2015. "Progress in centralised ethics review processes: Implications for multi-site health evaluations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 117-123.
    11. Laurie Grealish & Amanda Henderson & Fritz Quero & Roslyn Phillips & May Surawski, 2015. "The significance of ‘facilitator as a change agent’ – organisational learning culture in aged care home settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(7-8), pages 961-969, April.
    12. Michael Woods & Grant Corderoy, 2021. "Improving Consumer‐Centred Aged Care: Addressing Issues of Sustainability, Service Integration and Market Incentives," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 54(2), pages 266-274, June.
    13. Temitope Olasunkanmi‐Alimi & Kristin Natalier & Monique Mulholland, 2022. "Everyday racism and the denial of migrant African women’s good caring in aged care work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1082-1094, July.
    14. Huw Brokensha & Andrew Taylor & Tony Barnes, 2017. "Changing Australia’s Age Pension Qualification Age: Modelling Differential Effects by Race," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(2), pages 203-229, April.
    15. Therese Jefferson & Siobhan Austen & Rhonda Sharp & Rachel Ong & Gill Lewin & Valerie Adams, 2014. "Mixed-methods research: What’s in it for economists?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 290-305, June.
    16. Moore, Corey B., 2021. "Consumer directed care aged care reforms in Australia since 2009: A retrospective policy analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 577-581.
    17. Shang Wu & Hazel Bateman & Ralph Stevens & Susan Thorp, 2022. "Flexible insurance for long‐term care: A study of stated preferences," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(3), pages 823-858, September.
    18. Valerija Rogelj & David Bogataj & Marija Bogataj & Francisco Campuzano-Bolarín & Eneja Drobež, 2023. "The Role of Housing in Sustainable European Long-Term Care Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    19. Belinda Jessup & Tony Barnett & Kehinde Obamiro & Merylin Cross & Edwin Mseke, 2021. "Review of the Health, Welfare and Care Workforce in Tasmania, Australia: 2011–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Simon Eckermann & Lyn Phillipson & Richard Fleming, 2019. "Re-design of Aged Care Environments is Key to Improved Care Quality and Cost Effective Reform of Aged and Health System Care," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 127-130, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:25:y:2016:i:5-6:p:715-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.