IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnljam/v2016y2016i1n4543298.html

Viscosity Solution of Mean‐Variance Portfolio Selection of a Jump Markov Process with No‐Shorting Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Moussa Kounta

Abstract

We consider the so‐called mean‐variance portfolio selection problem in continuous time under the constraint that the short‐selling of stocks is prohibited where all the market coefficients are random processes. In this situation the Hamilton‐Jacobi‐Bellman (HJB) equation of the value function of the auxiliary problem becomes a coupled system of backward stochastic partial differential equation. In fact, the value function V often does not have the smoothness properties needed to interpret it as a solution to the dynamic programming partial differential equation in the usual (classical) sense; however, in such cases V can be interpreted as a viscosity solution. Here we show the unicity of the viscosity solution and we see that the optimal and the value functions are piecewise linear functions based on some Riccati differential equations. In particular we solve the open problem posed by Li and Zhou and Zhou and Yin.

Suggested Citation

  • Moussa Kounta, 2016. "Viscosity Solution of Mean‐Variance Portfolio Selection of a Jump Markov Process with No‐Shorting Constraints," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2016(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2016:y:2016:i:1:n:4543298
    DOI: 10.1155/2016/4543298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4543298
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2016/4543298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merton, Robert C., 1972. "An Analytic Derivation of the Efficient Portfolio Frontier," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(4), pages 1851-1872, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander, Gordon J. & Baptista, Alexandre M., 2006. "Portfolio selection with a drawdown constraint," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 3171-3189, November.
    2. Min Dai & Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou, 2009. "Continuous-Time Markowitz's Model with Transaction Costs," Papers 0906.0678, arXiv.org.
    3. Fu, Chenpeng & Lari-Lavassani, Ali & Li, Xun, 2010. "Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with borrowing constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 312-319, January.
    4. Taras Bodnar & Yarema Okhrin & Valdemar Vitlinskyy & Taras Zabolotskyy, 2018. "Determination and estimation of risk aversion coefficients," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 297-317, June.
    5. Scheuenstuhl, Gerhard & Zagst, Rudi, 2008. "Integrated portfolio management with options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1477-1500, March.
    6. Yue Qi & Xiaolin Li, 2020. "On Imposing ESG Constraints of Portfolio Selection for Sustainable Investment and Comparing the Efficient Frontiers in the Weight Space," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    7. Bodnar Taras & Schmid Wolfgang, 2011. "On the exact distribution of the estimated expected utility portfolio weights: Theory and applications," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 28(4), pages 319-342, December.
    8. Wenzelburger, Jan, 2008. "A Note on the Two-fund Separation Theorem," MPRA Paper 11014, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 31 Sep 2008.
    9. Yen Jui Chang & Wei-Ting Wang & Yun-Yuan Wang & Chen-Yu Liu & Kuan-Cheng Chen & Ching-Ray Chang, 2025. "Quantum Stochastic Walks for Portfolio Optimization: Theory and Implementation on Financial Networks," Papers 2507.03963, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    10. Yin-Yin Huang & Ruey-Chyn Tsaur & Nei-Chin Huang, 2022. "Sustainable Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Concerning Multi-Objective Risk Attitudes in Group Decision," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-15, September.
    11. Alejandro Corvalán, 2005. "Well Diversified Efficient Portfolios," Working Papers Central Bank of Chile 336, Central Bank of Chile.
    12. Istvan Varga-Haszonits & Fabio Caccioli & Imre Kondor, 2016. "Replica approach to mean-variance portfolio optimization," Papers 1606.08679, arXiv.org.
    13. Thomas J. Brennan & Andrew W. Lo, 2010. "Impossible Frontiers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 905-923, June.
    14. Rodolfo Aquino, 2006. "A variance equality test of the ICAPM on Philippine stocks: post-Asian financial crisis period," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 353-362.
    15. David S. Jones & V. Vance Roley, 1981. "Bliss Points in Mean-Variance Portfolio Models," NBER Technical Working Papers 0019, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Levy, Moshe, 2022. "An inter-temporal CAPM based on First order Stochastic Dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 734-739.
    17. Kim, Kyumin & Reimer, Matthew, 2024. "Fisheries Diversification and Local Economic Stability: Evidence from Alaskan Fishing Communities," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343874, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Nolan Alexander & William Scherer, 2024. "Using Machine Learning to Forecast Market Direction with Efficient Frontier Coefficients," Papers 2404.00825, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    19. Steuer, Ralph E. & Utz, Sebastian, 2023. "Non-contour efficient fronts for identifying most preferred portfolios in sustainability investing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 742-753.
    20. Penaranda, Francisco, 2007. "Portfolio choice beyond the traditional approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24481, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2016:y:2016:i:1:n:4543298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/4185 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.