IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnljam/v2014y2014i1n129205.html

Risk Comparison of Improved Estimators in a Linear Regression Model with Multivariate t Errors under Balanced Loss Function

Author

Listed:
  • Guikai Hu
  • Qingguo Li
  • Shenghua Yu

Abstract

Under a balanced loss function, we derive the explicit formulae of the risk of the Stein‐rule (SR) estimator, the positive‐part Stein‐rule (PSR) estimator, the feasible minimum mean squared error (FMMSE) estimator, and the adjusted feasible minimum mean squared error (AFMMSE) estimator in a linear regression model with multivariate t errors. The results show that the PSR estimator dominates the SR estimator under the balanced loss and multivariate t errors. Also, our numerical results show that these estimators dominate the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator when the weight of precision of estimation is larger than about half, and vice versa. Furthermore, the AFMMSE estimator dominates the PSR estimator in certain occasions.

Suggested Citation

  • Guikai Hu & Qingguo Li & Shenghua Yu, 2014. "Risk Comparison of Improved Estimators in a Linear Regression Model with Multivariate t Errors under Balanced Loss Function," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2014(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:n:129205
    DOI: 10.1155/2014/129205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/129205
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2014/129205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akio Namba & Kazuhiro Ohtani, 2007. "Risk comparison of the Stein-rule estimator in a linear regression model with omitted relevant regressors and multivariatet errors under the Pitman nearness criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 151-162, January.
    2. Namba, Akio, 2002. "Pmse Performance Of The Biased Estimators In A Linear Regression Model When Relevant Regressors Are Omitted," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(5), pages 1086-1098, October.
    3. Giles, Judith A., 1991. "Pre-testing for linear restrictions in a regression model with spherically symmetric disturbances," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 377-398, December.
    4. Kazuhiro Ohtani & David Giles & Judith Giles, 1997. "The exact risk performance of a pre-test estimator in a heteroskedastic linear regression model under the balanced loss function," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 119-130.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akio Namba & Kazuhiro Ohtani, 2007. "Risk comparison of the Stein-rule estimator in a linear regression model with omitted relevant regressors and multivariatet errors under the Pitman nearness criterion," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 151-162, January.
    2. A. Saleh & B. Golam Kibria, 2011. "On some ridge regression estimators: a nonparametric approach," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 819-851.
    3. Akio Namba, 2001. "MSE performance of the 2SHI estimator in a regression model with multivariate t error terms," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 81-96, January.
    4. Hu, Guikai & Peng, Ping, 2012. "Matrix linear minimax estimators in a general multivariate linear model under a balanced loss function," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 286-295.
    5. David E. A. Giles, 2000. "Preliminary-Test and Bayes Estimation of a Location Parameter Under 'Reflected Normal' Loss," Econometrics Working Papers 0004, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    6. Mohammad Arashi & Mahdi Roozbeh, 2015. "Shrinkage estimation in system regression model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 359-376, June.
    7. Hu, Guikai & Peng, Ping, 2011. "All admissible linear estimators of a regression coefficient under a balanced loss function," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(8), pages 1217-1224, September.
    8. Ohtani, Kazuhiro, 1996. "Further improving the Stein-rule estimator using the Stein variance estimator in a misspecified linear regression model," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 191-199, September.
    9. Buatikan Mirezi & Selahattin Kaçıranlar, 2023. "Admissible linear estimators in the general Gauss–Markov model under generalized extended balanced loss function," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 73-92, February.
    10. Wan, Alan T. K. & Zou, Guohua, 2003. "Optimal critical values of pre-tests when estimating the regression error variance: analytical findings under a general loss structure," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 165-196, May.
    11. Namba, Akio, 2003. "PMSE dominance of the positive-part shrinkage estimator in a regression model when relevant regressors are omitted," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 375-385, July.
    12. Zou, Guohua & Wan, Alan T.K. & Wu, Xiaoyong & Chen, Ti, 2007. "Estimation of regression coefficients of interest when other regression coefficients are of no interest: The case of non-normal errors," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(8), pages 803-810, April.
    13. Wang, Song-Gui & Ip, Wai-Cheung, 2003. "Inconsistency of estimate of the degree of freedom of multivariate student-t disturbances in linear regression models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 383-389, September.
    14. Arashi, M. & Tabatabaey, S.M.M., 2009. "Improved variance estimation under sub-space restriction," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(8), pages 1752-1760, September.
    15. Chaturvedi, Anoop & Shalabh, 2004. "Risk and Pitman closeness properties of feasible generalized double k-class estimators in linear regression models with non-spherical disturbances under balanced loss function," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 229-256, August.
    16. Namba, Akio & Ohtani, Kazuhiro, 2006. "PMSE performance of the Stein-rule and positive-part Stein-rule estimators in a regression model with or without proxy variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(9), pages 898-906, May.
    17. Zhang, Xinyu & Chen, Ti & Wan, Alan T.K. & Zou, Guohua, 2009. "Robustness of Stein-type estimators under a non-scalar error covariance structure," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(10), pages 2376-2388, November.
    18. Hu, Guikai & Yu, Shenghua & Luo, Han, 2015. "Comparisons of variance estimators in a misspecified linear model with elliptically contoured errors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 266-276.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2014:y:2014:i:1:n:129205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/4185 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.