IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v34y2025i3p431-441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cesarean Section, Childhood Health, and Schooling: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence From Denmark, Norway and Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica á Rogvi
  • Aline Bütikofer
  • Lone Krebs
  • Hanna Mühlrad
  • Miriam Wüst

Abstract

Despite being one of the most common surgical procedures in industrialized countries, there is limited causal evidence on the long‐term consequences of Cesarean section (CS). We study the impacts of CS on health during ages 1–12 years and human capital outcomes at age 16 years, using exogenous variation in the probability of receiving a CS for breech births at term—a group with high CS risk. We use administrative data from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden to show that preventing complicated vaginal births benefits health at birth and reduces the number of all‐cause hospital nights during childhood. Our findings for childhood diagnoses for asthma, allergies, diabetes mellitus type 1, and school outcomes are imprecise and do thus not lend strong support for prominent hypotheses on CS causing long‐term immune dysfunction disorders and, thereby, worse human capital outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica á Rogvi & Aline Bütikofer & Lone Krebs & Hanna Mühlrad & Miriam Wüst, 2025. "Cesarean Section, Childhood Health, and Schooling: Quasi‐Experimental Evidence From Denmark, Norway and Sweden," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(3), pages 431-441, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:431-441
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4914
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4914?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel Facchini, 2022. "Forgetting‐by‐not‐doing: The case of surgeons and cesarean sections," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 481-495, March.
    2. Facchini, Gabriel, 2022. "Low staffing in the maternity ward: Keep calm and call the surgeon," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 370-394.
    3. Halla, Martin & Mayr, Harald & Pruckner, Gerald J. & García-Gómez, Pilar, 2020. "Cutting fertility? Effects of cesarean deliveries on subsequent fertility and maternal labor supply," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Jensen, Vibeke Myrup & Wüst, Miriam, 2015. "Can Caesarean section improve child and maternal health? The case of breech babies," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 289-302.
    5. Victor Hugo de Oliveira & Ines Lee & Climent Quintana‐Domeque, 2022. "The effect of increasing Women's autonomy on primary and repeated caesarean sections in Brazil," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1800-1804, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catalina Herrera-Almanza & Fernanda Marquez-Padilla & Silvia Prina, 2024. "C-Sections, Obesity, and Healthcare Specialization: Evidence from Mexico," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 38(1), pages 139-160.
    2. Bachner, Florian & Halla, Martin & Pruckner, Gerald J., 2024. "Do Empty Beds Cause Cesarean Deliveries?," IZA Discussion Papers 16981, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Tonei, Valentina, 2019. "Mother’s mental health after childbirth: Does the delivery method matter?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 182-196.
    4. Maria Koch Gregersen, 2024. "Earlier routine induction of labor—Consequences on mother and child morbidity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(10), pages 2399-2418, October.
    5. David Card & Alessandra Fenizia & David Silver, 2023. "The Health Impacts of Hospital Delivery Practices," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(2), pages 42-81, May.
    6. Costa-Ramón, Ana María & Rodríguez-González, Ana & Serra-Burriel, Miquel & Campillo-Artero, Carlos, 2018. "It's about time: Cesarean sections and neonatal health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 46-59.
    7. Ana Costa-Ramón & Mika Kortelainen & Ana Rodríguez-González & Lauri Sääksvuori, 2022. "The Long-Run Effects of Cesarean Sections," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 57(6), pages 2048-2085.
    8. Valentina Tonei, 2017. "Mother’s health after childbirth: does delivery method matter?," Discussion Papers 17/11, Department of Economics, University of York.
    9. Hanna Mühlrad, 2022. "Cesarean sections for high‐risk births: health, fertility, and labor market outcomes," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(4), pages 1056-1086, October.
    10. Barili, Emilia & Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica, 2021. "Fee equalization and appropriate health care," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    11. Hope Corman & Dhaval Dave & Nancy E. Reichman, 2018. "Evolution of the Infant Health Production Function," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(1), pages 6-47, July.
    12. Halla, Martin & Mayr, Harald & Pruckner, Gerald J. & García-Gómez, Pilar, 2020. "Cutting fertility? Effects of cesarean deliveries on subsequent fertility and maternal labor supply," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. David Card & Alessandra Fenizia & David Silver, 2018. "The Health Effects of Cesarean Delivery for Low-Risk First Births," NBER Working Papers 24493, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Dehos, Fabian T. & Paul, Marie & Schäfer, Wiebke & Süß, Karolin, 2024. "Time of Change: Health Effects of Motherhood," IZA Discussion Papers 16942, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Sofia Amaral‐Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Veronica Grembi, 2015. "Does Experience Rating Improve Obstetric Practices? Evidence from Italy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(9), pages 1050-1064, September.
    16. Torrisi, Orsola & Svallfors, Signe & Gargiulo, Maria, 2024. "Obstetric violence in the context of community violence: The case of Mexico," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    17. Julieta Vera Rueda, 2024. "Perception, investments, and newborn's outcomes: the perception of a newborn's health and its influence on parental investment and health outcomes: Evidence from ELFE cohort," PSE Working Papers halshs-04840623, HAL.
    18. Marina Di Giacomo & Massimiliano Piacenza & Luca Salmasi & Gilberto Turati, 2024. "Understanding productivity in maternity wards," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza def134, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    19. Maibom, Jonas & Sievertsen, Hans H. & Simonsen, Marianne & Wüst, Miriam, 2021. "Maternity ward crowding, procedure use, and child health," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    20. Sofia Amaral-Garcia & Paola Bertoli & Veronica Grembi, 2015. "Does Experience Rating Improve Obstetric Practices? Evidence From Geographical Discontinuities in Italy," CEIS Research Paper 342, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 08 May 2015.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:34:y:2025:i:3:p:431-441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.