IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/empleg/v22y2025i4p422-437.html

Centered Advantage: A Geographic Measure of Partisan Fairness in Redistricting

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey T. Barton
  • Jon X. Eguia

Abstract

We introduce a measure of partisan advantage in redistricting that takes into account a state's political geography. We define a party's geographic baseline seat‐share as the proportion of the state's inhabitants for which the party would win a district centered around the inhabitant's location of residence. If the geographically ideal district for each voter is the most compact district with this voter at its center, a party's geographic baseline is the share of residents for whom the party wins their ideal district. A party's “Centered Advantage” is then the difference between the seats the party wins, and its geographic baseline number of seats. We compute the Centered Advantage for each legislative and congressional 2024 district map for all 50 states using precinct‐level statewide elections results from 2016 to 2020. We observe that Democrats' geographic baseline increases with district size, and that Democrats are underrepresented in nationwide seat aggregates: the GOP has a Centered Advantage of about twenty‐eight U.S. congressional seats, and over a hundred and fifty state legislative seats.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey T. Barton & Jon X. Eguia, 2025. "Centered Advantage: A Geographic Measure of Partisan Fairness in Redistricting," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 422-437, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:422-437
    DOI: 10.1111/jels.70001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70001
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jels.70001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:empleg:v:22:y:2025:i:4:p:422-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1740-1461 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.