IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/eldpol/v4y2025i2p109-122.html

Lack of nuclear family ties and satisfaction with core discussion networks: A cross‐national examination of Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Christine A. Mair
  • Kasey Knopp
  • Amanda Cardone
  • Min Kyoung Park

Abstract

Global shifts in longevity, fertility, and partnership have disrupted nuclear family relationships, resulting in a growing population who are unpartnered, childless, or who do not include their partners and children in their core discussion networks. Lacking nuclear family ties in a core discussion network could lead to lower satisfaction with one's network which, in turn, is associated with poorer health. Yet, it is unclear if being unpartnered and/or childless (family structure) or being partnered with children but not reporting them as members of your discussion network (network structure) are associated with lower network satisfaction and if these associations are contextualized by gender and global development. We examine the extent to which family structure and core discussion network structure are associated with network satisfaction by analyzing data from the 2015 (57,389 individuals in 18 countries) and 2021/2022 (64,934 individuals in 28 countries) waves of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Logistic regression results stratified by sex and level of country development indicate that lacking nuclear family ties in a core discussion network is associated with lower network satisfaction, with gendered patterns: men are more dissatisfied without partners, while women are more dissatisfied without children. These associations are consistent across countries but somewhat attenuated in highly developed contexts. As family structures continue to transform, we recommend an increased emphasis on nonnuclear family ties in research and policy to more effectively reduce risks of unmet social and emotional needs in aging populations. 全球寿命、生育率和伴侣关系的变化扰乱了核心家庭关系, 导致越来越多的人单身、无子女, 或未将伴侣和子女纳入其核心讨论网络。核心讨论网络中缺乏核心家庭关系,可能导致对自身网络满意度降低, 进而与健康状况下降相关。然而, 目前尚不清楚单身和/或无子女 (家庭结构) 或有伴侣且有子女但未将他们纳入讨论网络 (网络结构) 一事是否与较低的网络满意度相关, 以及这些关联是否会受到性别和全球发展的影响。我们通过分析欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)2015年 (18个国家的57,389人) 和2021/2022年 (28个国家的64,934人) 的数据, 探讨了家庭结构和核心讨论网络结构与网络满意度之间的关联程度。按性别和国家发展水平分层的逻辑回归结果表明, 核心讨论网络中缺乏核心家庭关系与较低的网络满意度相关, 且存在性别差异:男性在没有伴侣的情况下满意度较低, 而女性在没有子女的情况下满意度较低。这些关联在不同国家普遍存在, 但在高度发达的背景下有所减弱。随着家庭结构的不断转变, 我们建议在研究和政策制定中更加重视非核心家庭关系, 以更有效地降低老龄人口社会和情感需求未得到满足的风险。 Los cambios globales en la longevidad, la fertilidad y las relaciones de pareja han alterado las relaciones familiares nucleares, lo que ha dado lugar a una creciente población sin pareja, sin hijos o que no incluye a sus parejas e hijos en sus redes de discusión principales. La falta de vínculos familiares nucleares en una red de discusión principal podría conducir a una menor satisfacción con la propia red, lo que, a su vez, se asocia con una peor salud. Sin embargo, no está claro si no tener pareja o sin hijos (estructura familiar) o tener pareja con hijos pero no reportarlos como miembros de la red de discusión (estructura de la red) se asocia con una menor satisfacción en la red y si estas asociaciones se contextualizan en función del género y el desarrollo global. Examinamos en qué medida la estructura familiar y la estructura de la red de discusión principal se asocian con la satisfacción en la red mediante el análisis de datos de las oleadas de 2015 (57.389 personas en 18 países) y 2021/2022 (64.934 personas en 28 países) de la Encuesta de Salud, Envejecimiento y Jubilación en Europa (SHARE). Los resultados de la regresión logística, estratificados por sexo y nivel de desarrollo del país, indican que la falta de vínculos familiares nucleares en una red de discusión central se asocia con una menor satisfacción en la red, con patrones de género: los hombres se sienten más insatisfechos sin pareja, mientras que las mujeres se sienten más insatisfechas sin hijos. Estas asociaciones son consistentes en todos los países, pero se atenúan ligeramente en contextos altamente desarrollados. A medida que las estructuras familiares continúan transformándose, recomendamos un mayor énfasis en los vínculos familiares no nucleares en la investigación y las políticas para reducir de forma más eficaz el riesgo de necesidades sociales y emocionales insatisfechas en las poblaciones que envejecen.

Suggested Citation

  • Christine A. Mair & Kasey Knopp & Amanda Cardone & Min Kyoung Park, 2025. "Lack of nuclear family ties and satisfaction with core discussion networks: A cross‐national examination of Europe," Journal of Elder Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 109-122, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:109-122
    DOI: 10.1002/jey2.70006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jey2.70006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jey2.70006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Ting & Zhang, Yanlong, 2015. "Social network types and the health of older adults: Exploring reciprocal associations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 59-68.
    2. George Pavlidis & Thomas Hansen & Andreas Motel-Klingebiel & Marja Aartsen, 2022. "Network and solitude satisfaction as modifiers of disadvantages in the quality of life of older persons who are challenged by exclusion from social relations: a gender stratified analysis," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2859-2875, October.
    3. Howard Litwin & Michal Levinsky & Ella Schwartz, 2020. "Network type, transition patterns and well-being among older Europeans," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 241-250, June.
    4. Nekehia T Quashie & Bruno Arpino & Radoslaw Antczak & Christine A Mair & Deborah Carr, 2021. "Childlessness and Health Among Older Adults: Variation Across Five Outcomes and 20 Countries," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(2), pages 348-359.
    5. Matthijs Kalmijn, 2013. "The Educational Gradient in Marriage: A Comparison of 25 European Countries," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 50(4), pages 1499-1520, August.
    6. Ella Schwartz & Howard Litwin, 2018. "Social network changes among older Europeans: the role of gender," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 359-367, December.
    7. Susan L Brown & Kagan A Mellencamp & I-Fen Lin, 2022. "Sole Family Survivors: Older Adults Lacking Family of Origin Kin," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(5), pages 930-935.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Grand H.-L. & Sung, Pildoo & Chan, Angelique & Ma, Stefan & Malhotra, Rahul, 2022. "Transitions between social network profiles and their relation with all-cause mortality among older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Frauke Meyer-Wyk & Susanne Wurm, 2024. "The role of social network diversity in self-perceptions of aging in later life," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Michal Levinsky & Melanie Wagner & Alina Schmitz & Ella Cohn-Schwartz & Martina Brandt, 2025. "Introducing the Social Integration Index for Older Europeans: The Role of Gender and Care Regimes," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 759-779, September.
    4. George Pavlidis & Thomas Hansen & Andreas Motel-Klingebiel & Marja Aartsen, 2022. "Network and solitude satisfaction as modifiers of disadvantages in the quality of life of older persons who are challenged by exclusion from social relations: a gender stratified analysis," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(5), pages 2859-2875, October.
    5. Torres, Zaira & Oliver, Amparo & Tomás, José M. & Kondo, Naoki, 2024. "Exploring social network typologies and their impact on health and mental well-being in older adults: Evidence from JAGES," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    6. Marta Pittavino & Bruno Arpino & Elena Pirani, 2025. "Kinlessness at Older Ages: Prevalence and Heterogeneity in 27 Countries," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(1), pages 371-392.
    7. Liat Raz-Yurovich & Barbara S. Okun, 2024. "Are highly educated partners really more gender egalitarian? A couple-level analysis of social class differentials in attitudes and behaviors," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 50(34), pages 1005-1038.
    8. Marcel Raab & Emanuela Struffolino, 2020. "The Heterogeneity of Partnership Trajectories to Childlessness in Germany," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(1), pages 53-70, March.
    9. Liping Ye & Xinping Zhang, 2021. "The association mechanism between social network types and health‐related behaviours among the elderly in rural Hubei Province, China," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 826-846, May.
    10. Julia Mikolai & Ann Berrington & Brienna Perelli-Harris, 2018. "The role of education in the intersection of partnership transitions and motherhood in Europe and the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(27), pages 753-794.
    11. Vonneilich, Nico & Lüdecke, Daniel & von dem Knesebeck, Olaf, 2020. "Educational inequalities in self-rated health and social relationships – analyses based on the European Social Survey 2002-2016," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    12. Young Bum Kim & Seung Hee Lee, 2022. "Gender Differences in Correlates of Loneliness among Community-Dwelling Older Koreans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-11, June.
    13. Zheng Zhang & Huijie Xu & Runjia Zhang & Yangxinyu Yan & Xi Ling & Yun Meng & Xilin Zhang & Yuanyuan Wang, 2025. "Frailty and depressive symptoms in relation to cardiovascular disease risk in middle-aged and older adults," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Premchand Dommaraju & Shawn Wong, 2023. "Transition to first marriage in Thailand: cohort and educational changes," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Ho, Christine & Kim, Dahye & Ray, Rohan & Teerawichitchainan, Bussarawan, 2026. "Childlessness and health in middle age and older adulthood: Evidence from Singapore," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Øystein Kravdal & Martin Flatø & Fartein A. Torvik, 2025. "Fertility among Norwegian Women and Men with Mental Disorders," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 41(1), pages 1-30, December.
    17. Nolan, Brian & Azzollini, Leo & Breen, Richard, 2022. "From Gender Equality to Household Earnings Equality: the role of Women's Labour Market Outcomes across OECD Countries," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-13, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    18. Albert Esteve & David S. Reher, 2021. "Rising Global Levels of Intergenerational Coresidence Among Young Adults," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 47(3), pages 691-717, September.
    19. Ann W. Nguyen, 2017. "Variations in Social Network Type Membership Among Older African Americans, Caribbean Blacks, and Non-Hispanic Whites," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(4), pages 716-726.
    20. Friedman, Elliot & Franks, Melissa & Teas, Elizabeth & Thomas, Patricia A., 2024. "Social connectedness, functional capacity, and longevity: A focus on positive relations with others," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:eldpol:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:109-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.