IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i6p8280-8294.html

The Relationship Between ESG and Financial Performance in Global Firms: A Multidimensional Study Across Sectors and Regions for the Period 2015–2025

Author

Listed:
  • Hasan Tutar
  • Dalia Štreimikienė
  • Hakan Tahiri Mutlu

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance and the financial performance of global firms by integrating stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and the resource‐based view (RBV). While stakeholder and legitimacy theories emphasize external alignment, RBV frames ESG as an internal capability, highlighting the complementarity and tension among these perspectives. The analysis focuses on a panel of 287 publicly listed firms from multiple sectors and regions, covering the 2015–2025 period. The 2025 data consist of projections from Bloomberg and MSCI ESG Scores. The 2025 data used in this study are projections based on quarterly ESG and financial reports from Bloomberg Terminal and MSCI ESG Ratings. These were used solely for descriptive and forecasting purposes and were not included in causal or inferential analyses. ESG data were obtained from Refinitiv Eikon, and financial performance was assessed using three indicators: Return on Assets (ROA), Return on Equity (ROE), and Tobin's Q. Cluster analysis was employed to classify firms based on ESG performance patterns, while Granger causality tests were used to examine temporal relationships between ESG indicators and financial performance. The results reveal sectoral and temporal heterogeneity. In particular, environmental performance shows more stable positive associations with financial indicators than social and governance dimensions. Granger results indicate that ESG affects financial performance with varying time lags depending on the sector and ESG dimension. These findings underscore the strategic relevance of ESG and suggest that a uniform approach to ESG integration may be ineffective. This research contributes to the growing ESG literature by combining multiple theoretical lenses and methodological approaches. Managerial implications and policy relevance are discussed, and the study outlines future research directions, including the need to examine the role of macroeconomic shocks and regulatory contexts. Limitations such as sample size and generalizability are acknowledged.

Suggested Citation

  • Hasan Tutar & Dalia Štreimikienė & Hakan Tahiri Mutlu, 2025. "The Relationship Between ESG and Financial Performance in Global Firms: A Multidimensional Study Across Sectors and Regions for the Period 2015–2025," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8280-8294, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:8280-8294
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70136
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatemi, Ali & Glaum, Martin & Kaiser, Stefanie, 2018. "ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 45-64.
    2. Amina Mohamed Buallay & Meera Al Marri & Nohade Nasrallah & Allam Hamdan & Elisabetta Barone & Qasim Zureigat, 2023. "Sustainability reporting in banking and financial services sector: a regional analysis," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 776-801, January.
    3. Christophe Revelli & Jean-Laurent Viviani, 2015. "Financial performance of socially responsible investing (SRI): what have we learned? A meta-analysis," Post-Print halshs-01141295, HAL.
    4. Amir Amel-Zadeh & George Serafeim, 2018. "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 87-103, July.
    5. Rui Albuquerque & Yrjö Koskinen & Chendi Zhang, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4451-4469, October.
    6. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    7. Antonio D'Amato & Camilla Falivena, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and firm value: Do firm size and age matter? Empirical evidence from European listed companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 909-924, March.
    8. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    9. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    10. Sakis Kotsantonis & George Serafeim, 2019. "Four Things No One Will Tell You About ESG Data," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 31(2), pages 50-58, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyun-Jung Nam & Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Doojin Ryu, 2024. "Firm value, ownership structure, and strategic approaches to ESG activities," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 187-226, March.
    2. Carlos Estevez‐Mendoza & Juan Infante, 2025. "Evolution and relevance of research on Environmental, Social, and Governance factors," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1545-1566, March.
    3. Iulia Lupu & Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Gabriela tigu & Georgiana Cosoveanu & Radu Ion Filip, 2025. "ESG Reporting and Systemic Risk: Evidence from European Markets," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 869-869, August.
    4. Pruthiranjan Dwibedi & Debasis Pahi & Antarjyami Sahu, 2024. "Mapping the landscape of environmental, social and governance research: A bibliometric analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 3745-3767, September.
    5. Angelidis, Timotheos & Michairinas, Athanasios & Sakkas, Athanasios, 2024. "World ESG performance and economic activity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Leili Soltanisehat & Soheil Sibdari, 2026. "Exploring the Heterogeneous Financial Value of ESG Adoption: A Global Study Across Industries and Regions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2654-2674, February.
    7. Mirela Sichigea & Laura Vasilescu & Lauren?iu Mihai & Catalina Sitnikov, 2025. "Modeling ESG Relationships with the Employability-Operational Growth-Profitability Trilogy in the European Food System," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(69), pages 329-329, April.
    8. Duong, An Thi Thuy, 2025. "Resilience or returns: Assessing green equity index performance across market regimes," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Muhammad Alamgir & Magdalena Osińska & Ming‐Chang Cheng, 2026. "Green Bonds Impact on Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Financial Risk and Financial Quality," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S2), pages 1135-1154, March.
    10. Emanuele Teti & Alberto Dell'Acqua & Paolo Bonsi, 2022. "Detangling the role of environmental, social, and governance factors on M&A performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1768-1781, September.
    11. Murat Doğan & Muhammed Aslam Chelery Komath & Özlem Sayilir, 2025. "Credit rating prediction with ESG data using data mining methods," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Aymen Ajina & Ajej Bhiri Najah & Fathi Jouini, 2025. "CO2 Emissions and Firm Performance: Assessing the Effectiveness of the Paris Agreement and the Moderating Role of ESG Performance and ISO 14001 Certification," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 8026-8051, November.
    13. Abdelghafar M. Elhady & Samaa Shohieb, 2025. "AI-driven sustainable finance: computational tools, ESG metrics, and global implementation," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, December.
    14. Alkan, Doga & Ayari, Rayan & Paraschiv, Florentina, 2026. "Green fees: Sustainability impacts on portfolio management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    15. Valeria Schifilliti & Alessandra Patti & Giovanna Centorrino, 2025. "Grease the Wheel! An Empirical Study on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and SMEs' Performance in the ICT Industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 7871-7887, November.
    16. Amir Gholami & Peter A. Murray & John Sands, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance & Financial Performance Disclosure for Large Firms: Is This Different for SME Firms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    17. Adrian MOROȘAN & Diana Elena VASIU, 2025. "The Sustainability Reports (Esg) And Their Impact On The Stock Prices Of The Listed Companies: A Synthetic Analysis Of Academic Literature," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 20(2), pages 155-178, August.
    18. Stela Jorgji & Jonida Teta & Saeed Mousa & Vadim Ponkratov & Izabella Elyakova & Larisa Vatutina & Andrey Pozdnyaev & Tatiana Chernysheva & Elena Romanenko & Mikhail Kosov, 2024. "Sustainable Human Capital Management, ESG, and Firm Performance: Moderating Role of ESG Disclosure," Post-Print hal-05271946, HAL.
    19. Mohamed Rashwan & Nardin Farouk & Rania Pasha, 2025. "Can ESG Strategies Drive Firm Value Growth in the MENA Region?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-30, September.
    20. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:8280-8294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.